Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/delist/File:PowerStation3.svg

Coal-fired thermal power station

Reason: Editorial decision by article editors to replace one version with another, only difference is inclusion of text - the text is now in the articles - see Thermal_power_station#Diagram_of_a_typical_coal-fired_thermal_power_station for how it's used.
Articles this image appears in: Fossil fuel power station, Thermal power station
Previous nomination/s: Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/PowerStation
Nominator: Papa Lima Whiskey (talk)

Delist and replace as default. — Papa Lima Whiskey (talk) 02:55, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delist, clearly, no opinion on replace at this time. J Milburn (talk) 12:24, 30 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delist and replace: Clearly, because it's the proposed replacement that's being used, and text outside of the graphic is typical. I would suggest that voting delist and not replace at this stage is counter-productive, because it just means no conclusion is reached, instead of succeeding in the primary goal, to swap the star to the new one. Opinion on delisting alone can be made at any other time.
talk 21:22, 10 September 2010 (UTC)[reply
]
- It's not my primary goal to "swap the star to the new one"- we shouldn't give images an easier time just because we're delisting another, similar image. I'm not convinced I would support if the replacement was being nominated anew, so I'm not going to support at this time here. J Milburn (talk) 21:34, 10 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  - I kind of see your point, but I think it's illogical (at least in this scenario) to maintain an opinion which will give an unsatisfactory result, than to change it and achieve something, with a view to further movement if need be. I suspect that this image will not be delisted at this time. Neither will it be replaced. So we've already achieved nothing. You may wish for it to be delisted, and can state it as a preference, but if "the power station graphic" is going to remain an FP, might it not as well be the one actually being used? I don't see how a "replace for administration sake, but prefer a straightforward delist" would be a problem. If it does end up being replaced and not delisted, a new delist nom can always be forthcoming, anyway. Well, just a suggestion, :)
    talk 21:45, 10 September 2010 (UTC)[reply
    ]
    - So far, we have three people who want it delisted, two who want it replaced. The picture will likely not be in use at the end of the discussion. It will almost certainly be delisted (and, frankly, if it's not in use at the end of the discussion, even if a load of people have shouted keep, it should be delisted...). I consider it highly unlikely (and probably outside the remit of this venue) that the image will be "replaced and not delisted". My vote doesn't make this any less likely to be delisted, just less likely to be replaced. J Milburn (talk) 10:35, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
D&R. chat} 18:02, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply
]

Delist and replace per Maedin. Spencer^T♦C 23:55, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Question Isn't it possible to put changeable language text into an SVG file? --I'ḏ ♥One 02:32, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

D&R Cowtowner (talk) 19:21, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Replaced with File:PowerStation2.svg --I'ḏ ♥One 19:48, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Featured_picture_candidates/delist/File:PowerStation3.svg&oldid=1138148540"