Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/delist/TakakkawFalls2 edit.jpg

Reason

800x533 resolution is unacceptable for an easily replaceable image. I'm surprised it hasn't been delisted already.

Articles this image appears in

British Columbia Takakkaw Falls Rainbow

Previous nomination/s

Original Nomination, [Nomination] From two years ago, a fiasco that somehow got the image kept though is never addressed the issue of resolution and only fixed cloning errors. Let's not repeat that mistake by saying it's a pretty picture.

Nominator

Cowtowner (talk)

• Delist — Cowtowner (talk) 21:42, 23 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delist Nothing really redeemable about this image, very low resolution, blown out highlights, etc... — raeky ^{(talk | edits)} 01:28, 24 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delist How did this one escape delisting for so long, this is small even by my standards and I'm usually happy to support keeping older images with smaller sizes. My personal thanks to anyone who eventually shoots a better version of this and uploads it since it's a great shot if it can be done well and at the right size. Cat-five - talk 03:16, 24 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delist per nom and raeky. --Avenue (talk) 10:39, 24 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delist with grief. Nice and rare photo, but sadly too small... --George Chernilevsky ^talk 14:17, 24 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delist per nom.--
  WP:FOUR) 22:41, 25 May 2010 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delist, as above. J Milburn (talk) 10:27, 28 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delist, per above, the major factor being low resolution. --
  talk) 12:02, 30 May 2010 (UTC)[reply
  ]

Delisted --Jujutacular ^T · C 06:26, 31 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]