Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/delist/Veined leaf

Veined leaf

Reason

Low resolution, poor composition (cut off on three sides), reproducible

Nominator

Pstuart84 Talk

• Delist —
  Pstuart84 Talk 21:21, 15 May 2008 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delist I had been meaning to nominate this one myself.
  talk) 22:21, 16 May 2008 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Keep. Renominate this when a better alternative has been uploaded. Currently, this image does its encyclopaedic job very well. Papa Lima Whiskey (talk) 08:28, 17 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• weak keep per PLW; delist this when we get a better one. Matt Deres (talk) 14:24, 17 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep I think this does a very good job of showing the veins in a leaf. With that as it's purpose,a wider crop would just add distracting background. Clegs (talk) 17:44, 17 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Nominate again when a better is available. crassic!^[talk] 17:51, 17 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - Per Clegs and Crassic. ^8thstar 02:29, 18 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. This picture is quite informative. I would wait to delist until a better picture is taken. NauticaShades 15:06, 18 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delist I agree a wider crop might not help but that just looks off kilter... it will still be used in the articles even if not featured. gren グレン 19:56, 18 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delist Even worse cut-off than the one below. There are thousands of badly cut but very encyclopedic pics on Wiki - what makes this special. Motmit (talk) 19:52, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delist Because of the crop. It's a relatively easy photo to reproduce. The freddinator (talk) 20:37, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delist As aforementioned, the way it is cropped makes it much less appealing. Otherwise if the entire leaf was shown it would be deserving of FP.-- mcshadypl ^TC 08:16, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Kept MER-C 12:22, 23 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]