Wikipedia:Featured portal candidates/Portal:Physics

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Portal:Physics

This is a fairly old portal; it was started on

24 March 2005. For a long time, it's been fairly inactive; it's become increasingly active over the last few months, and I've just given it a facelift and instituted a few new systems. We now have weekly rotation of "Selected articles" and "Selected pictures"; we also have News (links to physics-related stories on Wikinews) and Anniversary sections. There's also the usual intro to the subject, and lists of categories/useful starting pages. I believe that the portal is now up to Featured status, hence this nomination. Mike Peel 21:25, 25 December 2006 (UTC)[reply
]

Objections:

Thanks for your comments. I hope I have now addressed all of your objections (see Portal:Physics). I haven't created a "Selected biography" section, as I'm concerned that there won't be sufficient good-quality articles to be featured in both Selected Articles (52 per year) and a new section. Although, I guess that one possibility would be to only update a Selected Biography section once per month.
Have you any other objections/suggestions for improvement? Mike Peel 20:45, 28 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Very nice work. Almost all the issues have been dealt carefully. In DYK section, you could use "..." as suffix in the heading. Please consider using "...More interesting facts" rather than "...More Did you know" which does not suit.
T/C) 23:21, 28 December 2006 (UTC)[reply
]
Thanks - I was aware that "More Did you know" didn't sound too good, but I wasn't able to think up a better line at the time. Your suggested changes have now been made. Mike Peel 08:35, 29 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I have fixed "..." on the portal page. Hopefully, you wanted to fix in that manner as I did. I support the portal to be featured.
T/C) 08:44, 29 December 2006 (UTC)[reply
]
True, but that just lists the pages in a different format, sans the portal tasks and wikiproject links. It's less of a "Things you can do" list, and more a "Pages needing attention" list, anyhow. I still hold that the best method (i.e. keeping the page simple and up-to-date) is to link to the pages as I have currently done. Mike Peel 14:50, 29 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support. Overall very nicely done, just a few minor problems:
    • In "Did you know...": "'Lasers" should be "lasers" (linking only the singular word), add an image of the Large Hadron Collider accelerator chain, and create a suggestions page for it.
    • In "December anniversaries": "December 221968" should be "December 22, 1986" and the hyphen should come after it.
    • In "Physics news": I don't like the change of dates format between the sections, so change either it or "December anniversaries". There also seem to be no updates for over a month, while over 2 or 3 months without updates are often a criteria for FP delisting. Michaelas10 (Talk) 16:55, 29 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Your first two points should now be addressed, along with most of the latter. I'm currently working on the news section; that should be up to date shortly. We've only been using Wikinews as a source up to now, which hasn't been updated since Nov 19th. Mike Peel 19:01, 29 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment Please avoid thumb mark-up in image formatting. It conflicts with background colours.--
    talk 11:35, 4 January 2007 (UTC)[reply
    ]
  • Please avoid using red links in
    T/C) 13:48, 6 January 2007 (UTC)[reply
    ]
Sorry; I've been a bit distracted with templates this last week. I added this week's image this morning, and will add the next month's worth or so later this evening. Mike Peel 10:07, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Please consider reducing the image size for the present selected picture. It is a very long image. So, I suppose, 250px would be sufficient to have for this one.
T/C) 18:38, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply
]
Fixed. I went with 200px wide; it still seems to be large enough to see all the details at that size. Mike Peel 18:42, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The issues have been dealt accordingly. I do not think of any points to delay in promotion of the portal.
T/C) 20:43, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply
]
  • Support looks great. Arjun 17:47, 13 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Joe I 05:42, 14 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment - Shouldn't we soon make a decision?? It seems that the portal has support for featured status, unless anyone else has objections? Snailwalker | talk 18:22, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]