Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2007 January 7

Uploaded by Mcgilld (notify | contribs). OR, user's only contribution and insufficient context to determine encyclopedic use BigDT 00:42, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:AlvinHoodlums.jpg (talk | delete)

Uploaded by

talk 00:43, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply

]

Image:New Technologies in Telecommunications Class.jpg (talk | delete)

Uploaded by OUdFlo (notify | contribs). OR, UE BigDT 00:48, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:463Class.JPG (talk | delete)

Uploaded by OUdFlo (notify | contribs). OR, UE BigDT 00:48, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:DavidBlackford.JPG (talk | delete)

Uploaded by Sosul469 (notify | contribs). OR, UE BigDT 00:51, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Mathieu en chemise.png (talk | delete)

Uploaded by Rafaelj3 (notify | contribs). OR, UE BigDT 00:52, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Mug.JPG (talk | delete)

Uploaded by Xrionx (notify | contribs). OR, UE BigDT 00:53, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Also, Image:Moog1.jpg and Image:Moog2.JPG, which are basically the same drawing of a coffee cup, just slightly different. --BigDT 00:55, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Kotsuku Game.gif (talk | delete)

Uploaded by Robonthespot (notify | contribs). OR, probably non-free BigDT 00:56, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Prod shot card kts2.gif (talk | delete)

Uploaded by Robonthespot (notify | contribs). OR, unencyclopedic, likely non-free BigDT 00:57, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:100 0089.jpg (talk | delete)

Uploaded by Itsswanny (notify | contribs). OR, Insufficient context to determine encyclopedic use BigDT 01:06, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:At The Fair.jpg (talk | delete)

Uploaded by DBoTheGreat (notify | contribs). OR, Insufficient context to determine encyclopedic use BigDT 01:07, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:D-BoFreshAndClean.jpg (talk | delete)

Uploaded by DBoTheGreat (notify | contribs). OR, presumably a photo of the uploader for an A7 deleted article BigDT 01:08, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Ani312to323jfk.gif (talk | delete)

Uploaded by

talk 01:10, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply

]

Image:Ani312to318jfk.gif (talk | delete)

Uploaded by

talk 01:10, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply

]

Image:Ari2.jpg (talk | delete)

Uploaded by

talk 01:27, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply

]

Image:Audioslave-Stage.jpg (talk | delete)

Uploaded by

talk 01:48, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply

]

Image:20050725 172151 Oasis250705.jpg (talk | delete)

Uploaded by Oasisrocks (notify | contribs). orpahned image, sole contribution of user, copyrighted on image, likely not PD Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr.) 01:51, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:CSatanMode.jpg (talk | delete)

Uploaded by

WP:BLP Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr.) 01:54, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply

]

Image:AverellHarriman.jpeg (talk | delete)

Uploaded by

talk 01:55, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply

]

Image:B21465047.jpg (talk | delete)

Uploaded by

talk 02:06, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply

]

Image:BATTitle.jpg (talk | delete)

Uploaded by

talk 02:07, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply

]

Image:BBC Concordia 01.jpg (talk | delete)

Uploaded by

talk 02:08, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply

]

Image:Flashfgds.jpg (talk | delete)

Uploaded by Wikipedia Patrol (notify | contribs). OR, only used to vandalize — Kesac 02:24, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Bald-overhead-man.jpg (talk | delete)

Uploaded by

talk 02:32, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply

]

Image:Baramidze Giorgi.jpg (talk | delete)

Uploaded by

talk 02:43, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply

]

No links, so just delete it. -Romihaitza 09:56, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Barney frank.jpg (talk | delete)

Uploaded by

talk 02:51, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply

]

Image:BarrettNCP.pdf (talk | delete)

Uploaded by

talk 02:54, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply

]

Image:Beardwearing.jpg (talk | delete)

Uploaded by

talk 02:56, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply

]

Image:Dynamic_logic_nand_gate.PNG (talk | delete)

Uploaded by CyborgTosser (notify | contribs). Dynamic_logic_nand_gate.PNG - obsoleted by Dlnand.svg ::mikm t 03:00, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Obsolete. CyborgTosser (Only half the battle) 22:13, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Beilein john051230.jpg (talk | delete)

Uploaded by

talk 03:05, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply

]

Image:Belaunde.jpg (talk | delete)

Uploaded by

talk 03:06, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply

]

Image:Fascism.jpg (talk | delete)

Uploaded by

talk 03:10, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply

]

Image:JamesLaraman.JPG (talk | delete)

Uploaded by

talk 03:11, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply

]

Image:BenKinnersley.jpg (talk | delete)

Uploaded by

talk 03:11, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply

]

Image:Benmanski.gif (talk | delete)

Uploaded by

talk 03:14, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply

]

Image:Big Booty on Bed.jpg (talk | delete)

Uploaded by

talk 03:32, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply

]

Image:Big.jpg (talk | delete)

Uploaded by

talk 03:33, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply

]

Image:Bigpapa.jpg (talk | delete)

Uploaded by

talk 03:36, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply

]

Image:Biker slut from the back.jpg (talk | delete)

Uploaded by

talk 03:37, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply

]

Image:PETA dumpster incident dead animal retrieval.jpg (talk | delete)

Previous IfD of keep overturned at Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2007 January 1. Speedy tag was removed due to not saying unambiguous delete, which I don't understand, but whatever. — Amarkov ^blah_edits 03:40, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I was a bit confused when I read Image talk:PETA dumpster incident dead animal retrieval.jpg which seemed to contradict the log...there were some keep votes there; not sure how to interpret the result of all the information combined. --HappyCamper 03:57, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That was the result of the IfD; why it was there, I have no idea. The DRV I linked to was unanimous. -Amarkov ^blah_edits 03:58, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Is there any good reason to delete this image? It seems to fit the topic. gdewar

The image was deleted because it is a news media photo. Wikipedia's policies do not permit the use of news media photos (see

WP:FAIR#Counterexamples #5). Even though we, as a non-profit with an educational purpose, could probably get away with it, there are commercial downstream uses of Wikipedia content. If we give them a media photo, we are depriving the news media of their right to sell the photo for a royalty. --BigDT 21:54, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply

]

Image:Marque du Gouvernement de la République Française.gif (talk | delete)

Uploaded by Kbolino (notify | contribs). Orphaned, a better version exists and is at Image:Logo de la République française.svg Tuncay Tekle 03:44, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Obsolete a better version exists. --Bob 20:16, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Not deleted - uploader not notified. I have tagged this image as orphaned fair use and notified the uploader. --BigDT 01:54, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Binaryproductdiagram.png (talk | delete)

Uploaded by

talk 03:45, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply

]

Image:BirdCalCondor.jpg (talk | delete)

Uploaded by

talk 03:52, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply

]

I don't think it's an incorrect tag. The site given says that all images are in the public domain. . . but it allows anyone to upload images to it (instructing users to only upload pd images), and may not be reliable. Either way, if the image is not needed to illustrate this species of condor, it should be deleted. – Quadell ^{(talk) (random)} 15:56, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yep. Looks like I was wrong about the incorrect tagging. Sorry about that. -

talk 01:40, 8 January 2007 (UTC)[reply

]

Not deleted - per discussion here --BigDT 01:56, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Birefringence.svg (talk | delete)

Uploaded by

talk 03:53, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply

]

It's not orphaned, it's the source of Image:Birefringence.png. There's not much point uploading diagrams in raster format only; it makes it very difficult for people to cleanly edit them. I know wikimedia is meant to have SVG support directly [1] but it doesn't seem to work in this case, all I see is some icon of a drawing palette on the image page and when linked in an article I just get a text link to the file. If you think this can be fixed perhaps let me know how on my talk page otherwise I'd say keep both files until full SVG support is there.--Russell E 21:33, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Not deleted - that's just weird. I saved the svg and opened it up in firefox and it looks like the PNG you pointed out. I am going to copy this discussion to the talk page so that it will be there in case this comes up again. --BigDT 02:05, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Bishop rob.jpg (talk | delete)

Uploaded by

talk 03:58, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply

]

Image:BlakeChase.JPG (talk | delete)

Uploaded by

talk 04:00, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply

]

Image:Blot.jpg (talk | delete)

Uploaded by

talk 04:03, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply

]

Image:Blue Coat Art Pupil 0001.JPG (talk | delete)

Uploaded by

talk 04:05, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply

]

Image:Blue Coat Chess Team 0001.JPG (talk | delete)

Uploaded by

talk 04:07, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply

]

Image:Blue ghost.png (talk | delete)

Uploaded by

talk 04:08, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply

]

Comment. This was originally used in {{para-stub}} and was never intented to appear in any article as "regular" image. So I'd say the decision is whether or not para-stub or any related stub is better with this image or in its present form without this? jni 12:25, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - it may be a non-free image. The source website says, "feel free to download anything you like". That's not the same as releasing it into the public domain and it isn't necessarilly even a claim of authorship. Unless a clipart site explicitly says that they created the content, it could just be stuff that they found on the internet. I looked and didn't see any terms of use, so unless we can get any more information, it should probably be deleted as a potentially non-free image. --BigDT 22:05, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Bmw 5 series.jpg (talk | delete)

Uploaded by

talk 04:14, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply

]

If it is a series 3 then the image can be renamed. This image when appropriately named might be a useful addition somewhere on the wiki, perhaps in the commons. Snowman 13:37, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Bobbryorrgoal.gif (talk | delete)

Uploaded by

talk 04:22, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply

]

Image:Bobcat-small.jpg (talk | delete)

Uploaded by

talk 04:34, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply

]

Image:Boden's mate.png (talk | delete)

Uploaded by

talk 04:39, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply

]

Image:Bond Girl.jpg (talk | delete)

Uploaded by

talk 04:43, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply

]

Image:Incredible Pizza companies logo.JPG (talk | delete)

Uploaded by Missilealert (notify | contribs). This image is used on a page that has also been nominated for deletion. Unless someone improves the page to be more than a "yellowpage" ad-like article (see Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not), then this picture should be deleted as it does not serve any other purpose. The page that it is located on as well as the company it represents, America's Incredible Pizza, is non-notable as well. — lov e laughterlife♥^talk? 04:44, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nevermind. Somebody extensively reconstructed the article. This image is useful as a complementary image now. --lov e laughterlife♥^talk? 17:29, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Not deleted --BigDT 02:12, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Bonner.jpeg (talk | delete)

Uploaded by

talk 04:44, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply

]

Image:Bowman.jpg (talk | delete)

Uploaded by

talk 04:52, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply

]

Image:Brandon Flowers.JPG (talk | delete)

Uploaded by

talk 05:06, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply

]

Image:British Hizb ut-Tahrir Delegation .jpg (talk | delete)

Uploaded by

talk 05:21, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply

]

Image:Pride complete guide.jpg (talk | delete)

Uploaded by

WP:FAIR#Counterexamples. — coelacan talk — 05:30, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply

]

Delete as the article does not discuss this book.--Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr.) 16:12, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The article was edited from the time of my comment; it is now discussed beyond a brief mention.--Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr.) 22:34, 9 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

- I believe that the book is discussed under Mary Pride#Homeschooling works --BigDT 21:59, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  - The Wikilink inthe article is now Mary Pride#On homeschooling and parental rights. CyberAnth 09:11, 9 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - - Admin nominator has been suspected by multiple users of engaging in
WP:HARASS of me, which someone brought up as an incident here; and the nom is itself is obviously erroneous as the article discusses the book as noted by BigDT. CyberAnth 22:26, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply
]
- The issue here are the merits of the nomination, not the merits of the nominator. --Ssbohio 05:07, 17 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. The rationale given for this nomination is easily dismissed by reviewing
Template:Book cover, which reads: "It is believed that the use of low-resolution images of book covers... to illustrate an article discussing the book in question... qualifies as fair use under United States copyright law." Gay Cdn was in error, as the article does discuss the book. Nick Graves 17:20, 9 January 2007 (UTC)[reply
]

Keep Apparently now meets fair use standards. --Ssbohio 05:07, 17 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Mary pride thewayhome.jpg (talk | delete)

Uploaded by

WP:FAIR#Counterexamples. — coelacan talk — 05:33, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply

]

Keep - this article specifically discusses the book and the motivations around writing it. The book itself is not notable enough to have its own article, it really can only be discussed in the context of the author's page. It is counter to the counterexample above.--Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr.) 16:14, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep both unless the article is deleted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mary Pride. Displaying a cover of a book when discussing the author of the book is obviously acceptable as fair use. --BigDT 21:59, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Admin nominator has been suspected by multiple users of engaging in
WP:HARASS of me, which someone brought up as an incident here; and the nom is obviously erroneous per the above two arguments. CyberAnth 22:27, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply
]
- Also, this image is at Quiverfull where the book is very specifically discussed at some length. CyberAnth 07:57, 9 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  - Having the image of the book cover adds nothing to the article. Removed image from article -
    talk 02:15, 21 January 2007 (UTC)[reply
    ]

Keep. The rationale given for this nomination is easily dismissed by reviewing
Template:Book cover, which reads: "It is believed that the use of low-resolution images of book covers... to illustrate an article discussing the book in question... qualifies as fair use under United States copyright law." Nick Graves 17:24, 9 January 2007 (UTC)[reply
]

Keep per
fair use. The Mary Pride article has survived its AfD as no consensus, so, in my view the image should stay. --Ssbohio 04:03, 11 January 2007 (UTC)[reply
]

Image:Brown gilbert.jpg (talk | delete)

Uploaded by

talk 05:34, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply

]

Image:Brucesalamon.JPG (talk | delete)

Uploaded by

talk 05:38, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply

]

Image:Murtle1.jpg (talk | delete)

Uploaded by Acbranch (notify | contribs). used on Murtle in vandalism cohesion 05:39, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Bryannance.jpg (talk | delete)

Uploaded by

talk 05:40, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply

]

Image:Murtle1.JPG (talk | delete)

Uploaded by Acbranch (notify | contribs). used on Murtle in vandalism cohesion 05:41, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Murtle.JPG (talk | delete)

Uploaded by Acbranch (notify | contribs). used on Murtle in vandalism cohesion 05:47, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Byrondorgan.jpg (talk | delete)

Uploaded by

talk 05:50, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply

]

My recommendation is to move this public domain image to Commons. It's not hurting anything having it on the wiki. --AlexWCovington (talk) 06:32, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Done - the image has been moved to Commons and the Wikipedia version deleted. --BigDT 02:23, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Vox_Clamantis_whitebg.jpg (talk | delete)

Uploaded by MaXiMiUS (notify | contribs). Orphan — MaXiMiUS 06:57, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Aichi Expo Hamasaki Ayumi.jpg (talk | delete)

Uploaded by Clouded (notify | contribs). CV, quite provably taken from copyright-violationg website which now being unaccessible. --Calvero JP 07:03, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Btree.svg (talk | delete)

Uploaded by Peter bertok (notify | contribs). LQ, OB by Btree.svg on Wikimedia Commons ::mikm t 08:59, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted - Commons image is now showing through. --BigDT 02:26, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Alanhansenmotd.JPG (talk | delete)

Uploaded by Bababoum (notify | contribs). Alanhansenmotd.JPG obsoleted by Allan hansen in 2005.JPG, which has a better copywright for the wiki — Snowman 13:28, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Both images are fine as far as I can see so why can't both be included? Bababoum 14:35, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If the copyright is ok, then the image can be kept, but the colours have not turned out that well, I feel. I tried taking a photograph of the TV today but it does not work on my system. If the copyright permits screen shots for illustration, can you get another one with better colours, and perhaps another including the other commentators to give a better impression of the TV show? Snowman 16:54, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - It appears that TV screen shots have to be used in exactly the correct context. Snowman 11:51, 8 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - This image is a TV screenshot, which should only be used for commentary about the TV program itself. In other words, if you take a screenshot of

Star Trek VI for an article about Star Trek, that's probably fine. But for an article about coffee, it's not. --BigDT 22:10, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply

]

Image:Moises arias2.jpg (talk | delete)

Uploaded by

t

15:11z

Image:Image4.JPG (talk | delete)

Uploaded by Calumrouge (notify | contribs). orpahned image, absent uploader, question the GFDL claim given the collection of images and lack of source Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr.) 17:10, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:American dragon s02e07(2).jpg (talk | delete)

Uploaded by TSLcrazier (notify | contribs). Poor quality screen shot if the image is truly needed then a better quality one can be found easily --Malevious Userpage •Talk Page• Contributions 18:20, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Not deleted - uploader was not notified and image was not marked with {{
ifdc}}. --BigDT 02:29, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply
]

Image:Bellinaaaaa.JPG (talk | delete)

Uploaded by Sarysarysary (notify | contribs). orpahned image, sole contribution of user, low quality, unencylopedic use Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr.) 21:29, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Africa.JPG (talk | delete)

Uploaded by Kingafr (notify | contribs). orpahned image, absent uploader, only used in page blanking vandalism, unencylopedic use Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr.) 21:32, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:KYT.jpg (talk | delete)

Uploaded by Kingbob3rd (notify | contribs). orphaned image, recently absent uploader, low quality image, question if photograph of logo is PD-able. Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr.) 22:04, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Allegedflash2.JPG (talk | delete)

Uploaded by DanCrowter (notify | contribs). orpahned image, very low quality, no license provided Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr.) 22:16, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:England kit.jpg (talk | delete)

Uploaded by Bigmolejack (notify | contribs). orpahned image, sole contribution of user, unencylopedic personal photo Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr.) 22:20, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Internet Peadophilia.pdf (talk | delete)

Uploaded by Sponend (notify | contribs). orphaned document, sole contributionof user, originial research Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr.) 22:28, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Alison Doubleen.JPG (talk | delete)

Uploaded by Aileenlaj (notify | contribs). orpahned image, sole contribution of user, low quality, unencylopedic personal photo Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr.) 22:31, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:GarrettOppenheim.jpg (talk | delete)

Uploaded by Determinedopportunist (notify | contribs). OR, user's only contribution, presumably for an A7-deleted article BigDT 22:45, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Z_syndicate.jpg (talk | delete)

Uploaded by Bostonjoe (notify | contribs). Advertising an MMORPG clan, unencyclopedic, and orphaned — Agentscott00^(talk) 23:41, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Eagle-small.jpg (talk | delete)

This is taken out of context the full words are: "Both the CD jacket and on CD face are printed with the words "royalty free photographs from Preferred Stock Photo Agency / copyright 1994 Walnut Creek, CA CDROM" = That means the copyright owner is Preferred Stock Photo Agency and they are allowing this image royalty free (totally free). Goldenrowley 23:59, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Bison-small.jpg (talk | delete)

This is taken out of context the full words are: "Both the CD jacket and on CD face are printed with the words "royalty free photographs from Preferred Stock Photo Agency / copyright 1994 Walnut Creek, CA CDROM" = That means the copyright owner is Preferred Stock Photo Agency and they are allowing this image royalty free (totally free). Goldenrowley 00:00, 8 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"Royalty free" does not mean free in the Wikipedia sense of the word. For example, I may give you permission to replicate an item internally within your organization without paying royalties for each use. I may give you permission to distribute to third parties. But that permission alone does not automatically mean that you have the right to sub-license that permission. Unless you have something that explicitly says they have released all rights or some similar text, they probably should not be used here. Thanks. --BigDT 04:54, 8 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ok , thank you for taking the time to explain the difference between "royalty free" and "releasing all rights" now I understand what your concern was and accept that. Goldenrowley 02:43, 12 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]