Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2009 December 12

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete - While there may be some merit in the below keep arguments, this image has been noted as lacking a rationale for over 6 days. - Peripitus (Talk) 09:43, 20 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:German-national-team-v-england-white-hart-lane-1935-3-nil.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Silent Billy (notify | contribs).

• Fails nfcc, no FU rationale, and I can see no way a valid one can be created Fasach Nua (talk) 18:51, 13 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep So far as I can see the image meets all 10 points in the fair use policy. It's an historic image used to illustrate a section of article on the history of the team. Silent Billy (talk) 22:44, 14 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - An interesting image and from the information that is emerging on the image discussion page it appears that a suitable FU can be worked up. Wiggy! (talk) 22:45, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:04, 20 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mats Halldin May 2008.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Raven in Orbit (notify | contribs).

• This is a photo of an indefinitely blocked editor. It was only used on his userpage and has no value to the project. Burpelson AFB (talk) 02:22, 12 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. Beeblebrox (talk) 18:50, 12 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 09:06, 20 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:ApusApus.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Sarum blue (notify | contribs).

• The bird is actually a
  ZooFari 05:23, 12 December 2009 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Speedy Delete per

File:Australia Sri Lanka Locator.PNG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Blackknight12 (notify | contribs).

• Does not work needs to be re uploaded Blackknight12 (talk) 08:09, 12 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:04, 20 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Chinmay26r (notify | contribs

).

• This file is an orphan. Also another version of this logo has been uploaded but with a different file name:File:PCBLogo.jpg.
  Nirvanareborn 11:24, 12 December 2009 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 11:07, 20 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Al-Araba1-1.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Ammar shaker (notify | contribs).

• According to the article on the Al Araba 1, production vehicles are/were being made. Not many were built, but this image plus File:Al-Araba1-2.jpg and File:Al-Araba1-3.jpg are thus replaceable and should be deleted. Angus McLellan (Talk) 17:07, 12 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 11:07, 20 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:A8 Coupe.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Jagvar (notify | contribs).

• This image has twice been tagged as replaceable non-free content and has twice been rejected. The Audi A8 article claims that this vehicle still exists and is held in Munich. It seems to me that the image is indeed replaceable as any interested editor in the Munich area may make arrangements to photograph the vehicle. Angus McLellan (Talk) 17:15, 12 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep It's a unique vehicle and even if it's held/stored in Munich, the only option to get an image would be if the car is somehow accessible. Bot not even a websearch shows images of this car. --00:16, 13 December 2009 (UTC)

Delete being difficult to photograph is not a criteria, it exists so an image is possible.MilborneOne (talk) 17:49, 13 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:04, 20 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Amos brothers.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by J (notify | contribs).

• The supplied rationale for this image is weak, if no worse than many, in terms of explaining why it is not readily replaceable, but it does not address at all
  WP:NFCC#8. There is no reason to suppose that the non-free picture of the founders of the corporation "would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding". Angus McLellan (Talk) 19:07, 12 December 2009 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete as failing

File:747 flight attendants.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by E30mpower (notify | contribs).

• It's not evident to me that this non-free image adds to the readers' understanding, nor that its absence would detract from it. We have no end of free images of the 747 available to use here. Angus McLellan (Talk) 19:40, 12 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete doesnt really add to the readers' understanding, the flight attendants are not mentioned in the text are not really notable to the aircraft. MilborneOne (talk) 19:52, 12 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep It is a rare, historic picture. The arguments from the
  2007 attempt to delete still apply. -Fnlayson (talk) 01:13, 13 December 2009 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• NO Delete It's historic, and representative of mass-comunication marketing

I agree, keep this picture. It shows our past attitudes well.92.0.247.52 (talk) 23:24, 17 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 09:06, 20 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dungeons & Dragons Miniatures.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Alan De Smet (notify | contribs).

• Orphaned file, succeeded by File:Dungeons & Dragons Miniatures 2.jpg, which the author notes as being superior to this image. — ξ^xplicit 23:30, 12 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 09:06, 20 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kit scp0910training.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Lulzone (notify | contribs).

• Orphaned file, image too small to accurately portray whatever it is that's trying to be shown here. — ξ^xplicit 23:36, 12 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 09:06, 20 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Large TeX Font.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Mbeychok (notify | contribs).

• Orphaned file, easily replaceable with text. — ξ^xplicit 23:36, 12 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment from the description, it was generated through Wikipedia markup, and is a screenshot... 76.66.192.35 (talk) 05:56, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Transwiki to commons. 76.66.192.35 (talk) 05:56, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 09:06, 20 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Map-WA-522.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Wiki890 (notify | contribs).

• Orphaned file, succeeded by File:Washington State Route 522.svg. — ξ^xplicit 23:40, 12 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.