Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2009 May 9

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete Graeme Bartlett (talk) 06:38, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:BandslamOST.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Johnny0929 (notify | contribs).

• Poorly made photoshop job. It appears to be http://i43.tinypic.com/2a91fo3.jpg with a title slapped on it. No report of soundtrack release at the label, no sign of soundtrack release at Amazon. —Kww(talk) 02:26, 9 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Obviously fanmade. It is not attached with any source or something. Obviously fake. Kikkokalabud (talk) 03:49, 11 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete No sign of existence of such an album/single. — BQZip01 — ^talk 02:44, 17 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Graeme Bartlett (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:04, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pb bill kim.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Ladida (notify | contribs).

• Replaceable non-free use image, actor is living, free use therefore is obtainable. Can't use non-free use simply because it is difficult to obtain a free use. Ejfetters (talk) 05:17, 9 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Unused copyvio. — BQZip01 — ^talk 02:45, 17 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Deleted under F5 and F6 un used and no non free use rationale for any articles. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 03:59, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete Graeme Bartlett (talk) 06:42, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lechu z robolami.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by User:Space Cadet (notify | contribs).

• Two reasons:

1. The licence tag claims PD because the photograph was first published in Poland before 1994. However, there is no information about who took the picture, and where and when it was first published.
2. This may not be obvious to those who don't speak Polish, but the filename is offensive. So if the copyright status is resolved, the image should be deleted and re-uploaded with a neutral filename. — Kpalion^(talk) 10:55, 9 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete We need more information to keep this image as stated in #1. #2. Nothing is prohibiting anyone from re-uploading it under a new name (you can do that now). — BQZip01 — ^talk 02:49, 17 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment: I already tried that once, but the re-uploaded image was deleted from Commons because it lacked source information. So it's better to sort out the source and license first. It would make no sense to rename a file that should be deleted anyway. The fact that we have an image with an offensive filename only makes the matter more urgent. — Kpalion^(talk) 11:45, 17 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.