Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2009 September 28

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by

File:Heartlessscreenshot.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Dfnj123 (notify | contribs).

• Image fails
  WP:NFCC#8 as the image does not add significantly to readers' understanding of the article and its omission would not be detrimental to that understanding. This image can (and is) easily described in words. — ξ^xplicit 04:39, 28 September 2009 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete Can't disagree with nominator's comments. --Artene50 (talk) 07:33, 4 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: speedily deleted by

File:Dashanzi.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Asakawano (notify | contribs).

• OB user image for myself, new image = File:User-Asakawano-798.jpg — Asakawano (talk) 04:55, 28 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - per
  WP:CSD#F1.--Rockfang (talk) 01:15, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by

File:16.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by PruittBlood (notify | contribs).

• orphaned, low quality, subject not identified Skier Dude (talk) 05:26, 28 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by

File:15597113051911l.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by UNTOWxun (notify | contribs).

• orphaned, low-res, subjects not identified, no encyc use Skier Dude (talk) 05:27, 28 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by

File:111th US Senate composition.svg.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Qbanito21 (notify | contribs).

• orphaned, low-quality Skier Dude (talk) 05:29, 28 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep (but rename). kmccoy (talk) 12:45, 22 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:12072008015.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Mobman (notify | contribs).

• orphaned, building not identified Skier Dude (talk) 05:30, 28 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• The building is
  snigbrook (talk) 10:54, 4 October 2009 (UTC)[reply
  ]
  • It also exists on http://i345.photobucket.com/albums/p396/mobmans/12072008015.jpg although the Wikipedia version is a higher resolution.
    snigbrook (talk) 11:05, 4 October 2009 (UTC)[reply
    ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by

File:1985barricade.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Cuteness1234 (notify | contribs).

• orphaned, persons/event not identified, no encyc use Skier Dude (talk) 05:32, 28 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by

File:1985barricade1.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Cuteness1234 (notify | contribs).

• orphaned, persons/event not identified, no encyc use Skier Dude (talk) 05:33, 28 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by

File:2007 team picture.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Th'WhiteLion (notify | contribs).

• orphaned, really low quality, subjects/event not identified Skier Dude (talk) 05:34, 28 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 11:44, 1 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sugababes LineUp4.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Bulldoggie101 (notify | contribs).

• This image is replaceable. Sancho 05:35, 28 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • The lineup of their band is new and there aren't many images of them together, never mind free ones... especially since they argue with each other so much. Find me a free replacement and I will personally delete this image myself. --Deskana (talk) 16:01, 28 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    • The criteria is "Non-free content is used only where no free equivalent is available, or could be created, ...". The free equivalent does not have to exist, but only needs to be possible to create, which is assumed (except in rare cases) for any living person or extant group. Either way, I realized the correct way to resolve this is to use the {{rfu2}} template. Sancho 16:31, 28 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I wanted to see new line up of Sugarbabes - good to see wiki right there at top search on google - don't remove

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by

File:2008Ampsaward.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by DMorpheus (notify | contribs).

• orphaned, low quality, subjects/event not identified Skier Dude (talk) 05:39, 28 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by

Emperor Genius (notify | contribs

).

• orphaned, name that food??? Skier Dude (talk) 05:41, 28 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Macher Jhol.JPG. --Martin H. (talk) 16:17, 28 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by

File:2201146220 8052521f79 b.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Douglas.flowe (notify | contribs).

• orphaned, low quality, building not identified Skier Dude (talk) 05:42, 28 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please note, that it comes from http://www.flickr.com/photos/22811035@N02/2201146220/, maybe a copyright violation too. --Martin H. (talk) 16:15, 28 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by

File:2393redtie.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Umnpsykid07 (notify | contribs).

• orphaned, low quality, subject not identified Skier Dude (talk) 05:42, 28 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete and speedy if possible. Unidentified subject. --Artene50 (talk) 07:34, 4 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Feydey (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 11:44, 1 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:2941890.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Senciadk (notify | contribs).

• orphaned,building/city not identified Skier Dude (talk) 05:44, 28 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Also a copyright violation from http://www.panoramio.com/photo/2941890. --Martin H. (talk) 16:18, 28 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 11:44, 1 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:6268008.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Gmgmarshall (notify | contribs).

• orphaned, city not identified Skier Dude (talk) 05:47, 28 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The city is Asheville. However, a copyright violation from http://www.panoramio.com/photo/6268008. --Martin H. (talk) 16:20, 28 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by

File:ADO.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Miramar93 (notify | contribs).

• orphaned, very low quality image Skier Dude (talk) 05:52, 28 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Very bad quality and replacable image too. --Artene50 (talk) 07:35, 4 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by

File:Alicep.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Fredhollywood (notify | contribs).

• orphaned, no source, subject not identified Skier Dude (talk) 05:58, 28 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by

File:Alls Hell Ends Well.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by JonathanZW (notify | contribs).

• orphaned, no target article or other encyc use Skier Dude (talk) 06:01, 28 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by

File:AIIA National President's Forum 2007 1.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by OliverHaardt (notify | contribs).

• orphaned, resolution/cropping messed up Skier Dude (talk) 06:02, 28 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by

File:1970-87.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Mtaylor848 (notify | contribs).

• The fair use rationale states that The image is used to identify the organization Asda, a subject of public interest. The significance of the logo is to help the reader identify the organization, assure the readers that they have reached the right article containing critical commentary about the organization, and illustrate the organization's intended branding message in a way that words alone could not convey. However, another
  WP:NFCC#1 and NFCC#3a Papa November (talk) 07:59, 28 September 2009 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Note: The file was moved from File:1970-87.jpg to File:Asda logo 1970-1987.jpg by TheDJ (talk · contribs) at 17:57, 28 September 2009. Anomie⚔ 11:44, 1 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Maybe it would meet the criteria if the logo was the subject of a specific part of the text in the article, but as it's only being used to identify the organisation (there is no mention of the logo in the text, either when the image was added to the article or in the current version) it probably fails
  snigbrook (talk) 11:28, 4 October 2009 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Image does not exist. If the file name in the header contains a typo, feel free to correct the typo and un-close this discussion. AnomieBOT⚡ 10:06, 28 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:DILIP HIRO.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Krivuk (notify | contribs).

• Photograph taken on private property. Subject has registered strong objection.Krivuk (talk) 09:58, 28 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by

File:L d736c8dd45725ce5fa17262535bf93d8.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Alexjblock (notify | contribs).

• Not ever used in any articles. Never used on a userspace. Possible someone wanted to use Wikipedia as their webhost but that's not what Wikipedia is for, correct? I see no further encyclopedic value of this picture and it's completely impossible to identify the persons on the picture either by file name or description. SoWhy 10:57, 28 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Kmccoy (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 14:12, 22 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Map of Torun fortress.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Piotrus (notify | contribs).

• Image could be replaced with a free alternative. Previously tagged as such, however I've declined the speedy, and brought it here for discussion. PhilKnight (talk) 12:36, 28 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - Maybe I'm just being pessimistic, but I doubt a free image could be made with as much detail as this one has.--Rockfang (talk) 01:20, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment: that is entirely irrelevant. Free maps can technically be made with as much detail as anybody wishes to put into them. Besides, it's uncontroversial that the underlying printed map is most likely PD anyway. The question is just if there is copyright on the handwritten and colored additions - and the content of those could easily be reproduced in a new map. In short, the question here is: PD or not PD; there is most certainly no question of Fair Use or not Fair Use. Non-free maps are virtually never legitimate for fair use (unless they are themselves the object rather than a vehicle of discussion), as they are always replaceable. Fut.Perf. ☼ 12:43, 30 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    • Reply - I don't think it is irrelevant. This image is currently tagged as being non-free. If a free version is made, I think it should have the same detail this one has. That way the same information is conveyed. Also, regarding whether or not the image is PD or not, why did you tag the file for "fair use disputed" if the file is possibly PD?--Rockfang (talk) 17:49, 30 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
      • I tagged it as "fair use disputed" because I myself don't believe it is PD – and in fact nobody had previously claimed it was; I am just discussing this here as a theoretical possibility. As for the fair use claim, whether or not somebody actually will sit down and make a free replacement map, and how much detail they will use, is indeed immaterial: the criterion only refers to whether this would be possible in principle, not whether it has actually been done. Of course, anybody is free to take an old PD printed map of the town – the original print model of this one or any similar one – and create something new on that basis. Fut.Perf. ☼ 20:57, 30 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by

File:Formosa.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by QuantockWarrior (notify | contribs).

• Orphan - not linked to by any WP articles, and as the photo of a UK PPC in the next election, highly unlikely that any such article will exist for at least a year Saalstin (talk) 14:13, 28 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: image is dependent on a 3-times deletion article. ww2censor (talk) 15:17, 1 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by

File:Mark Formosa mugshot.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by QuantockWarrior (notify | contribs).

• Orphan - not linked to by any WP articles, and as the photo of a UK PPC in the next election, highly unlikely that any such article will exist for at least a year Saalstin (talk) 14:13, 28 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: image is dependent on a 3-times deletion article. ww2censor (talk) 15:17, 1 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Wrong forum. The file is on Commons, please nominate it for deletion there if you still feel it should be deleted. AnomieBOT⚡ 15:07, 28 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tina Charles cropped.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by SPhilbrick (notify | contribs).

• Mistakenly added without correcting title. Identical image exists with better title SPhilbrickT 14:38, 28 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by

File:PetainAndHitler-2.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Collard (notify | contribs).

• Copied from the Wikimedia Commons in anticipation of deletion by Collard. The file is non-free in the country of origin as it was created by Heinrich Hoffmann who died 1957, it will enter the public domain in 2028. However, the same file is available from the Cooperation with the Bundesarchiv under cc-by-sa-3.0, File:Bundesarchiv Bild 183-H25217, Henry Philippe Petain und Adolf Hitler.jpg, so no reason to keep this file under the US-only assumption of public domain as seized enemy property. --Martin H. (talk) 16:09, 28 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support deletion, as the original uploader. Commons now has a higher-resolution version, it's pointless keeping this around. Lewis Collard! (lol, internet) 04:29, 30 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: speedily deleted by

File:Fsirfax Map with SR 608.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by timsabin (notify | contribs).

• Obsolete. Misspelling. Replaced by Fairfax Map with SR 608.png --Tim Sabin (talk) 16:42, 28 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.