Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2010 April 7

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:02, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ghkristinacorinthosdavis-kali.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Jester66 (notify | contribs | uploads).

• Also File:KalirodriguezGHkristina davis.jpg, uploaded by the same contributor
• I believe this image (the second picture is a cropped version of it) is a problem under
  WP:NFC #3 and #8. This article on a fictional character already includes an image of an actress in the role. It is not necessary to include two images of this fictional character to understand the article. WP:NFC advises that "Multiple items of non-free content are not used if one item can convey equivalent significant information", and while this image displays the character at a different age, "Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding." Since only one picture is necessary of the character in this article, I believe the one depicting the character as it is now is more appropriate. Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 15:03, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Wrong forum. The file is on Commons, please nominate it for deletion there if you still feel it should be deleted. AnomieBOT⚡ 16:07, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:800pxmature tadpole2.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Mokele (notify | contribs | uploads).

• File created specifically to vandalize Tadpole, by a persistent vandal. Mokele (talk) 15:41, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hotthermometer.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Dave 1968 (notify | contribs | uploads).

• orphaned, target article/encyc. use unclear Skier Dude (talk) 06:41, 31 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 16:18, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply

]

• Admin comment: Due to what seems to be a bug in
  Twinkle, this listing had been removed from its proper place. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 16:18, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 20 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Infrasound3.jpg).jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Daniel Christensen (notify | contribs | uploads).

• Orphaned, Low Quality, Unencyclopedic, Use not stated. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 05:52, 5 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 18:33, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply

]

• Admin comment: Due to what seems to be a bug in
  Twinkle, this listing had been removed from its proper place. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 18:33, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Iraqi Army personnel watch a fire burn after a bombing in Mosul.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Top Gun (notify | contribs | uploads).

• Incomplete source information renders the PD status unverifiable. User had problems with sources before. Damiens.rf 18:51, 28 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 18:43, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply

]

• Admin comment: Due to what seems to be a bug in
  Twinkle, this listing had been removed from its proper place. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 18:43, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:IsoSkin2.gif (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Isofilm (notify | contribs | uploads).

• orphaned, superseded by .png version Skier Dude (talk) 06:25, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 18:47, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply

]

• Admin comment: Due to what seems to be a bug in
  Twinkle, this listing had been removed from its proper place. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 18:47, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Funk Junkie (notify | contribs | uploads

).

• Alternate album cover that is not discussed anywhere in the article. Article already has a copyrighted album cover and this extra image, without sourced commentary on it, fails:
  NFCC#8 in not significantly increasing reader's understanding. Just because an alternate cover exists is not a compelling reason for it to have a copyrighted image here, the image is simply performing a decorative function - Peripitus (Talk) 08:27, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply
  ]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 19:16, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply

]

• Admin comment: Due to what seems to be a bug in
  Twinkle, this listing had been removed from its proper place. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 19:16, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:01-StudentVoice.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Alexanderryland (notify | contribs | uploads).

• Unused, unencyclopedic; unclear copyright status. Blurpeace 23:48, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:MS Azura - Stern.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Crazy-dancing (notify | contribs | uploads).

• MS Azura already has a non-free image of the ship. Doesn't need two. Eeekster (talk) 23:52, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, I agree. feydey (talk) 08:35, 8 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - The article may not 'need' two images, but both images are relevant and useful, and as the images have been widely released by P&O to promote the ship, it is unlikely that any restrictions would affect their use on Wikipedia Crazy-dancing (talk) 11:34, 8 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.