Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2010 September 11

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:03, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dropdead6.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Amandabilliot (notify | contribs | uploads).

• Orphaned image uploaded by a now-blocked sockpuppetteer and hoax page creator. Image is unlikely be useful | Uncle Milty | talk | 00:54, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:03, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Edith jacobson.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Ingesimons (notify | contribs | uploads).

• book cover used on author's page infobox w/no critical commentary Skier Dude (talk 02:36, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:03, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:EdgarCayceOnProphecypaperback.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by MakeRocketGoNow (notify | contribs | uploads).

• book used on author's page without critical commentary Skier Dude (talk 02:39, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:03, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Eddie-kendricks-lovekeys.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by FuriousFreddy (notify | contribs | uploads).

• album cover used on artist's article infobox without any critical commentary Skier Dude (talk 02:51, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:03, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Da li postoje stvari koje ne postoje.gif (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Aleksandar Šušnjar (notify | contribs | uploads).

• book used on author's page with no critical commentary Skier Dude (talk 02:52, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:03, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:DavidGibbinsAtlantis.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Eurosong (notify | contribs | uploads).

• book cover used on author's article with no critical commentary Skier Dude (talk 03:08, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:03, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:DavidSeidner.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Christophermedellin (notify | contribs | uploads).

• book cover used on author's article with no critical commentary Skier Dude (talk 03:09, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:03, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:HelenaBonhamCarter.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Christophermedellin (notify | contribs | uploads).

• photo from book used on artist's article with no critical commentary (no FuR) Skier Dude (talk 03:10, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• I think it does have critical commentary, far more so than most non-free content. It seems to me to show what the text says, S's homage to John Singer Sargent. Better this than a random work to represent his style. The book cover can go but the pic of HBC should stay. I'll add the templatecruft. Angus McLellan (Talk) 09:49, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:03, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:David samoylov.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Alex Bakharev (notify | contribs | uploads).

• book cover used on subject's article with no critical commentary Skier Dude (talk 03:15, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:03, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:EdMcgivernFastAndFancyRevolverShootingFrontCover.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Gualtiem (notify | contribs | uploads).

• book cover used on author's page with no critical commentary Skier Dude (talk 03:36, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:03, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:EdMcgivernFastAndFancyRevolverShootingBackCover.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Gualtiem (notify | contribs | uploads).

• book cover (obverse) used on author's page with no critical commentary Skier Dude (talk 03:37, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: unless someone wants to write a paragraph explaining what the target is all about. There's a nice image of the chap hisself on Commons File:EdMcGivern.jpg so no need for the non-free picture of him--Elen of the Roads (talk) 12:54, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:03, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:EdClarkBackCover.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Infrogmation (notify | contribs | uploads).

• book cover (reverse) used on subject's article infobox with no critical commentary Skier Dude (talk 03:38, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep until/unless a free licensed alternative image of this notable person is located for use in Wikimedia. Low res scan, shows person discussed in article at the time of his greatest fame. Image relevance was described when the image was added to the article years ago but had been lost in more recent edits; I have restored the caption. Infrogmation (talk) 13:34, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - Typically, non-free images are not supposed to be used to identify living people.--Rockfang (talk) 03:15, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: This could be speedied under a few different criteria. It has no FUR attached for one (CSD F6), second is that it is book cover being used in an infobox to illustrate not the book, but the subject (CSD F7). On its own it fails our
  Unacceptable use - Images: Number 10 - A magazine or book cover, to illustrate the article on the person whose photograph is on the cover. The only exception to any of this would be if the image were being used in a stand alone article about the book, or "if the cover itself is the subject of sourced discussion in the article". In the current article on the author of the book ther are only two lines: He published a book on his programs, entitled "A New Beginning". The book's introduction was by Eugene McCarthy. Far from any critical commentary on the book. Soundvisions1 (talk) 00:15, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete: surely. Fails on half a dozen counts.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete. However, this deletion is without prejudice to a speedy re-upload if the image can be made to follow the non-free guidelines. This image was deleted primarily because after the discussion and modifications, a proper fair use rationale still did not exist, and therefore one could not close this deletion as keep without running afoul of

File:Ecuminical Reflections.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Majoreditor (notify | contribs | uploads).

• book cover used on author's page with no critical commentary Skier Dude (talk 03:40, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment. Thank you for the note. I have just added critical commentary on the book into the appropriate article on Elias Zoghby:

Zogby outlined his views on the topic in his book Ecumenical Reflections, which was characterized by Vsevolod, the Orthodox Bishop of Scopelos, as an invitation "to ecumenical metanoia ... to recognize that where there is the fundamental common faith, held alike by Catholics and Orthodox, there is no defensible impediment to Eucharistic Communion."

Cheers, Majoreditor (talk) 22:40, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:03, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Eberhard Schoener.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Pinots (notify | contribs | uploads).

• album cover used on article with no critical commentary Skier Dude (talk 03:53, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 19:08, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:K.Nevelsteen-BGP-4x.png (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by K.Nevelsteen (notify | contribs | uploads).

• OR, couldn't get it to render in firefox or chrome Skier Dude (talk 04:08, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 19:08, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:MAY.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by FinkMischievous (notify | contribs | uploads).

• OR, UE, subject not ID'd Skier Dude (talk 04:16, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 19:08, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:MBElogosmall.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Vaitalien (notify | contribs | uploads).

• OR, UE Skier Dude (talk 04:17, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 19:08, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:MCG LOGO green.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Givechase (notify | contribs | uploads).

• OR, no encyc use - business card? Skier Dude (talk 04:22, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 19:08, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dear zoo.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Mrsmacleod (notify | contribs | uploads).

• book cover used on author's page with no critical commentary Skier Dude (talk 05:58, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 19:08, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Radio logo.png (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by DjJosh (notify | contribs | uploads).

• File was uploaded for the deleted Salt&Light Radio article, which has been speedy deleted several times and was recently deleted via AFD. Also nominating the following files for deletion for the same reasons. (Note: User:Drdindo14 is a sockpuppet of User:DjJosh.) WayKurat (talk) 07:05, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Radi1stqtr..gif (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by DjJosh (notify | contribs | uploads)

File:ScreenshotDjJosh.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by DjJosh (notify | contribs | uploads)

File:Joshf2010.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Drdindo14 (notify | contribs | uploads)

File:SLRLogo.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by DjJosh (notify | contribs | uploads)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 19:08, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:GeelCatsjumper.png (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Carls12 (notify | contribs | uploads).

• The image is clearly taken from http://www.goodscore.com.au/geelong-cats-2009-mens-home-guernsey-size-p-36984.html and http://www.goodscore.com.au/geelong-cats-2009-mens-clash-guernsey-size-p-37018.html Bidgee (talk) 14:28, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep It'd be useful if you can link direct to the file itself and not the page it's said to be on, for I see neither of these pages contain this file. Kimchi.sg (talk) 15:22, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep? How? It is clear that these ([1][2]) are the images which uploader has used. Bidgee (talk) 15:27, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• F11; no evidence of permission. Rehevkor ✉ 23:44, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 19:08, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Aquitania (notify | contribs | uploads

).

• Orphaned. SchuminWeb (Talk) 14:39, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• SchuminWeb - orphaned only applies if the image is not PD. This image is PD - it was published on behalf of the British Government during WWII. --Elen of the Roads (talk) 14:52, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Not true - images need to be employed somewhere to be hosted locally on Wikipedia. I would have moved this image to Commons, but determined it to be too low quality to be worth keeping around. That's why I nominated for deletion. I don't know where you get that public domain images are ineligible for deletion. SchuminWeb (Talk) 20:05, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

By mistake. Further note on your talkpage. Elen of the Roads (talk) 21:32, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• delete: better quality image of ship in similar position and livery available on commons.--Elen of the Roads (talk) 13:32, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 19:08, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Aquitania (notify | contribs | uploads

).

• Orphaned. SchuminWeb (Talk) 14:49, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Image is PD - it was published in 1907. Orphaned does not apply. --Elen of the Roads (talk) 14:54, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Not true - images need to be employed somewhere to be hosted locally on Wikipedia. I would have moved this image to Commons, but determined it to be too low quality to be worth keeping around. That's why I nominated for deletion. I don't know where you get that public domain images are ineligible for deletion. SchuminWeb (Talk) 20:08, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• delete: there seem to be numerous better quality images available --Elen of the Roads (talk) 13:26, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep - no compelling for deletion offered, and at least one editor has expressed a wish to keep it. Anyone may move to commons and mark it at any point. If someone believes the image to be unfree, please use

Aquitania (notify | contribs | uploads

).

• Orphaned. SchuminWeb (Talk) 14:54, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

*Image is PD under license. I know you have moved this one from Commons (and I'm clearly missing something about why you did it, for which I apologise as it's probably a very sound reason), but orphaned is still not a good reason to delete PD images from wikipedia.--Elen of the Roads (talk) 14:59, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• • Images need to be employed somewhere to be hosted locally on Wikipedia. I would have moved this image to Commons, but the cropped version of this image was already moved to Commons, and this one has distracting elements in it that make it not worthwhile to bother moving it to Commons when the cropped version of the same thing has all the worthwhile elements and none of the distractions. Also, I don't know where you got this idea that public domain images are ineligible for deletion. SchuminWeb (Talk) 20:07, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    • This isn't a PD image, anyway. Nyttend (talk) 19:45, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Does that mean that the Commons version isn't PD either??--Elen of the Roads (talk) 13:01, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Scratch that. Nyttend, why is this image not PD? Elen of the Roads (talk) 13:23, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep - no compelling for deletion offered, and at least one editor has expressed a wish to keep it. Anyone may move to commons and mark it at any point. Magog the Ogre (talk) 23:59, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Aquitania (notify | contribs | uploads

).

• Orphaned. SchuminWeb (Talk) 15:07, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Move to Commons license is compatible 70.29.210.72 (talk) 02:29, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• If Commons does not already have an image of this
  Failboat, I would certainly send it there. I'd do it myself, but I'd probably make a hash of it.--Elen of the Roads (talk) 23:14, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Schuminweb, I quite like this image so I've put it back into the article. You removed it just before you nominated it for deletion, saying there was a better free image on commons, but if there is, I can't find it (although this may be wholly down to me, in which case point me to it!!). --Elen of the Roads (talk) 13:21, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 19:08, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mahanayakuttamkumar.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Gourab bengalee (notify | contribs | uploads).

• Copyrighted image marked with free license. Another copyrighted image under FUR has been added to article of Uttam Kumar. JovianEye (talk) 17:30, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as

File:Strathgym1.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by K. Annoyomous (notify | contribs | uploads).

• orphaned image created by myself --K.Annoyomous (talk) 19:32, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:02, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Jyotibasudeath.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Wikinvigilator (notify | contribs | uploads).

• The image is made from several copyrighted images from the internet JovianEye (talk) 19:49, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Can you identify these copyrighted images? If we can pin down the sources, we can speedy-delete this image. SchuminWeb (Talk) 20:36, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have found the sources for at least two images. 1 2. --JovianEye (talk) 21:09, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Could you provide links to the pages that provide context for these images as well? I need to verify the license, and direct links to the images themselves are not as helpful as one might think. SchuminWeb (Talk) 00:43, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Here's 1 & 2 --JovianEye (talk) 03:24, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Going to speedy delete this as an F9... SchuminWeb (Talk) 05:04, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:00, 19 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Aquitania (notify | contribs | uploads

).

• Orphaned. Already on Commons in higher quality as File:Normandie fire.jpg. SchuminWeb (Talk) 20:22, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, inferior to Commons version. Nyttend (talk) 19:44, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: commons version is better and this does not contain any additional information. --Elen of the Roads (talk) 13:34, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep - no compelling for deletion offered, and at least one editor has expressed a wish to keep it. Anyone may move to commons and mark it at any point. Magog the Ogre (talk) 23:58, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Aquitania (notify | contribs | uploads

).

• Orphaned, low quality. SchuminWeb (Talk) 20:23, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Move to commons license is compatible. 70.29.210.72 (talk) 02:27, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • License is compatible, but... I would have done this myself, but it seems too low quality to be worthwhile, thus why I nominated for deletion. SchuminWeb (Talk) 05:04, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Question Does Commons have better images of this ship in this position? If not, send it there, since a lower-resolution photo is better than none. Nyttend (talk) 19:45, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Commons has a better image of the ship in this position and livery File:SS Leviathan 1913.jpg --Elen of the Roads (talk) 12:59, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.