Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2012 April 16

< April 15	April 17 >

April 16

File:Massoud 2000.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:09, 25 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Violates points 3a and 8 of

WP:NFCC. Used in an excessive amount of articles where this screenshot is not subject to critical commentary by secondary reliable sources, nor would its omission be detrimental to the understanding of those articles. Personally, File:Ahmad Shah Massoud.jpg seems like a better image to identity this deceased individual, and we only need one non-free image to do that. — ξ ^xplicit 01:15, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply

]

3a can be fixed, no reason for deletion. And it does by no means violate 8, as the image is of high importance and increases the reader's understanding. The image is the only clear picture of Ahmad Shah Massoud, while the other "personally favoured" by Explicit is merely a bad quality portrait cropped from another file - which remains questionable and as such is no security. Also, the copyright holder ina.fr has explicitly given the permission by e-mail to use the image with the ina.fr logo on all Afghanistan-related articles on wikipedia for educational purpose only. So, there is really no point in removing the image. JCAla (talk) 06:17, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I've tried to assess all points in

WP:NFCC

:

WT:C#RfC: What to do with respect to the copyright of countries with which the US does not have copyright relations?
may affect image choice).
WP:NFCC#2
: ~~no source so impossible to know if it passes it or not. Delete just to be on the safe side?~~ pass
WP:NFCC#3a
: fail in many articles I'd say. Images need to go away, but in the article on the person it could maybe stay if other images go away. No need to use it twice in the article on the person.
WP:NFCC#3b: tag added to request compliance (will be fixed automatically by DASHBot
)

WP:NFCC#4

:

no source so impossible to know if it passes it or not. Delete just to be on the safe side?

: fail except for infobox in the article on the person. However, any other photo of the same person could be used instead in the infobox if we so prefer.

WP:NFCC#9

: seems to pass in all articles

fail (no source)

As it looks for the moment, it seems that the image doesn't pass all points of

Stefan2 (talk) 01:33, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply

]

@Stefan, I didn't see it before, but now I see. The information on the source of the image was removed in an act of vandalism by this vandal SPA. I didn't see that as of yet. So many of the points you made above are fixed now. I restored the sourcing information. Also, there exists a written permission by INA to use the images for the mentioned purpose. JCAla (talk) 09:36, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have updated my opinion above. In my opinion, it is acceptable to have a picture of him in the infobox in the article about him, although I would favour

Stefan2 (talk) 14:12, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply

]

Ok, will only use it in the infobox of the Ahmad Shah Massoud article itself then. Is this agreed then? JCAla (talk) 20:03, 20 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. So much important for the peace process, please do not follow Taliban ideias.DARIO SEVERI (talk) 12:31, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
...Excuse me? — ξ ^xplicit 00:51, 24 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Massoud and Qadir 2.PNG

This discussion was subject to a deletion review on 2012 April 25.
For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. Most keep arguments have clearly failed to address the NFC issue at the core of this nomination, so they had to be discounted. Fut.Perf. ☼ 12:24, 25 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Violates point 8 of

WP:NFCC. Omission of this image from the articles it is being used in would not be detrimental to the understanding of those article. A non-free screenshot of these two individuals meeting and shaking hands is unnecessary, as that can be adequately described in text alone. — ξ ^xplicit 01:18, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply

]

3a can be fixed, no reason for deletion. And it does by no means violate 8, as the image is of high importance and increases the reader's understanding. "These two individuals meeting" has the same symbolic value as if Israeli prime minister Netanyahu was to meet with Iran's President Ahmadinejad. The image is of high importance for Afghanistan-related issues as it helps to promote peace and understanding between the two largest ethnic groups of Afghanistan. Ahmad Shah Massoud (Tajik) and Abdul Qadir (Pashtun) coming and working together and shaking hands is a deeply valuable gesture to have on an image. Especially now that there are renewed dangers of a "civil war" in Afghanistan including exactly the ethnicities of those leaders. Furthermore, the copyright holder ina.fr has explicitly given the permission by e-mail to use the image with the ina.fr logo on all Afghanistan-related articles on wikipedia for educational purpose only. So, there is really no point for removing this image. JCAla (talk) 06:20, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

We even have the new article

Ethnic violence in Afghanistan now, which in itself explains how important above mentioned image is. JCAla (talk) 12:02, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply

]

Delete - The event is notable, but not the image. Common mistake. Nothing to see here. --damiens.rf 16:26, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - The image is notable as it is what reaches the reader not the description of an event. Also, the copyright holder has allowed the use of the image for that purpose. JCAla (talk) 09:28, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The image isn't critically discussed in any article, so it fails
Stefan2 (talk) 14:12, 18 April 2012 (UTC)[reply
]

I fixed the

WP:NFCC#10c issue. JCAla (talk) 14:43, 20 April 2012 (UTC)[reply

]

Does it not matter that ina.fr has authorized the use of the image on Afghanistan-related wikipedia articles for educational purpose? JCAla (talk) 19:44, 18 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

That would only work as an argument against a

WP:NFCC#2 concern, but it has nothing do with the NFCC#8 issue. Fut.Perf. ☼ 07:08, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply

]

Since the image is of great significance and promotes peace I asked whether that would not be an important rationale to keep the image.[1] User:Jimbo Wales wrote,

"it strikes me that the photo easily meets

WP:NFCC#8. The factors you mention, particularly that "There exists no other image of the two leaders displaying that same gesture of peace." It is my view that NPOV promotes peace more than anything else. So while I think that Wikipedia should promote peace, what I mean by that is that we should promote NPOV thinking, i.e. calm, rational, thoughtful, fact-seeking as our primary mission. In a case like this, we should realize the educational value and learning impact of actually seeing the two leaders shaking hands - it brings home the reality of the peace process."[2]

So in that sense the image does satisfy and meet

WP:NFCC#8. It should therefore be kept for its value in that regard. JCAla (talk) 14:43, 20 April 2012 (UTC)[reply

]

You have not dealt with

WP:NFCC#1. --damiens.rf 18:12, 20 April 2012 (UTC)[reply

]

I have dealt with

WP:NFCC#1. There is no free equivalent for that image and its educational value. JCAla (talk) 19:42, 20 April 2012 (UTC)[reply

]

Keep per Jimbo Wales and per explicit permission of use by copyright holder. Cavarrone (talk) 22:28, 20 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep the copyright holder has authorized its use.
Hot Stop 15:06, 21 April 2012 (UTC)[reply
]
...Which doesn't address the concern in my nomination at all. — ξ ^xplicit 03:38, 22 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Event is clearly notable. The image is therefore notable, as it is the only image of that event which is available. If a better image should surface in future, that one could be substituted. There's no purpose to deleting images documenting important events. 75.60.19.202 (talk) 13:55, 22 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. It's strikingly significant. Should Afghanistan be considered a nation-state or is it just a territory dreamt up by the players of the Great Game and destined to ultimately fail? I have read the articles and seen the image. The image has significantly increased my understanding of the topic. PhnomPencil ^{talk contribs} 19:54, 22 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. So much important for the peace process, please do not follow Taliban ideias.DARIO SEVERI (talk) 12:31, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Meets NFCC#8. The picture adds substantively to the topic, and it would be detrimental, to such to delete. Alanscottwalker (talk) 01:46, 24 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:ChoppaNightvision.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 24 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

want to delete it, it is my work/property InvisibleDiplomat₆⁶₆ 02:58, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Overkantboek.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 24 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

non-free book cover being used just to show what the (living) guy on the cover looks like. damiens.rf 06:06, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:TJALIE.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 24 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

We have free images of this guy, so there's no reason to keep this non-free picture and use it as a decoration in every article that mentions the man. damiens.rf 06:10, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Tool hush screenshot.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 24 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

non-free, not discussed critically —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 06:16, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Tool logo-10kD.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 24 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:BANDLOGO#Band_logos, not discussed critically —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 06:16, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply

]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Tool logo-lat.svg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 24 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:BANDLOGO#Band_logos, not discussed critically —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 06:16, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply

]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Rocket Knight Adventures.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep - the image's use is properly educational (

WP:NFCC#3). Magog the Ogre (talk) 21:23, 10 May 2012 (UTC)}[reply

]

Non-free, not discussed critically —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 08:51, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep it illustrates what the game is like, (unlike the box cover, which illustrates nothing except the box cover -- box covers never looking like what the game actually looks like) 70.49.124.147 (talk) 01:37, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Screenshot isn't discussed in the article. Fails point eight of
WP:NFCC, lacks contextual significance. — ξ ^xplicit 00:51, 24 April 2012 (UTC)[reply
]

Keep per 70.49.124.147, passes point eight of
WP:NFCC, its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. Cavarrone (talk) 21:26, 24 April 2012 (UTC)[reply
]

Keep. A single, representative screenshot from the game is consistent with WMF policy allowing use of nonfree images to complement discussions of subjects under copyright. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 17:48, 9 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: It has value in that it shows what it is like to play the game. It also fits in with the fair use rationale.
talk to others) 02:48, 10 May 2012 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Sparkster (SNES).png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep - see reasoning above. Magog the Ogre (talk) 21:25, 10 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

non-free, not discussed critically —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 08:52, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep it illustrates what the game is like, (unlike the box cover, which illustrates nothing except the box cover -- box covers never looking like what the game actually looks like) 70.49.124.147 (talk) 01:37, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Screenshot isn't discussed in the article. Fails point eight of
WP:NFCC, lacks contextual significance. — ξ ^xplicit 00:51, 24 April 2012 (UTC)[reply
]

Keep per 70.49.124.147, passes point eight of
WP:NFCC, its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. Cavarrone (talk) 21:27, 24 April 2012 (UTC)[reply
]

Keep iff the box cover image is removed in return. I actually agree with the 70.49 anon above; this picture of the actual gameplay is more informative than the box cover – but then the conclusion to draw from this is that the cover should go. This very brief article doesn't need two non-free images. Fut.Perf. ☼ 08:16, 25 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. A single, representative screenshot from the game is consistent with WMF policy allowing use of nonfree images to complement discussions of subjects under copyright. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 17:49, 9 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: It has value in that it shows what it is like to play the game. It also fits in with the fair use rationale. Hghyux (talk to me)(talk to others) 02:48, 10 May 2012 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Biggie and Tupac still.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 24 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free, not discussed critically. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 10:12, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Tupac4.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. How does seeing the last photograph of this person add to one's understanding of his life or death? If this photograph is not particularly famous (and I'm forced to conclude that it isn't; see below), then what's the point in including it?

Now it may be that this photograph is famous and iconic. But no one here has provided a convincing explanation of why it is so. I will go over the !votes one-by-one:

Brandmeister:
WP:JUSTAPOLICY
.
Dancraggs:
WP:Clearly notable
24.147.151.99:
WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS
Cavarrone:
WP:JUSTAPOLICY
again - while much longer worded, it is also just an opinion without evidence provided.
Alanscottwalker: See Cavarrone.

If anyone believes this image:

Is iconic and famous
Is iconic and famous enough to warrant text in the Tupac article (whether caption or inline) and
Is iconic and famous enough to warrant text in the Tupac article not just as an excuse to keep an image we like but because it's worthy of inclusion

then I will be happy to point you to deletion review, where I will support your efforts to have the image undeleted and have another discussion take place. But as it stands, I'm just not seeing evidence. Magog the Ogre (talk) 21:42, 10 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free, not necessary to explain that the subject was in a car. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 10:13, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per licensing template, unique irreplaceable historical photo. Brandmeister^talk 19:55, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Irreplaceable and iconic image. Its notoriety is renowned. --
Dancraggs 12:11, 18 April 2012 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete, basically per nom: the decisive criterion here is not how unique and irreplaceable the photograph is or how historically important the situation is to which it is attached, but how much concrete information in conveys to help the viewer understand that situation. That information value is very low – Knowing what kind of clothes he was wearing or how he was looking out of the window at that moment does not help me understand the event of his shooting. Fut.Perf. ☼ 20:35, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete This isn't an article on Tupac in cars. Fails
Stefan2 (talk) 14:14, 18 April 2012 (UTC)[reply
]

Keep Remain objective, this is the last photograph of a notable person prior to his notable murder. A quick check of other notable people's articles who were also murdered/assassinated shows clearly that "last photographs" are broadly considered relevant on Wikipedia. Further the subject is in the vehicle the murder took place in, many "last photos" on Wikipedia cannot also claim to also illustrate the context of the event. 24.147.151.99 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 17:41, 18 April 2012 (UTC).[reply]
delete this imagery is not conveying any unique relevant information. --damiens.rf 15:48, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep historical, iconic image that helps to illustrate the death event itself which is described in the article and, as described in its rationale, "it furthers the goals of providing verifiable information concerning the paragraph's subject matter, in that it visibly demonstrates the subjects and the moment directly before the shooting". Passes
WP:NFCC#8 as the other NFCC criteria. Cavarrone (talk) 22:39, 20 April 2012 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete before a horrible precedent is set. Public figures are photographed frequently, if not daily. A "final picture before the subject's death" fails points one and eight of
WP:NFCC. The individual was alive on the day of their death. Do we need a non-free image to show that? No, no we don't. — ξ ^xplicit 00:51, 24 April 2012 (UTC)[reply
]

Keep adds substantively to understanding of the topic of the article section and reader understanding would be detrimentally harmed without it. Alanscottwalker (talk) 01:52, 24 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- This assertion is worthless without an explanation of how it does so. Fut.Perf. ☼ 08:17, 25 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  - Not as worthless, as the strawman nomination and deletes. It is an image which contains a scene of a living person in the car he died in moments later. As the section of the article discusses that living person and the circumstances of his death, it adds substantively to the
    educational value of the article section. Alanscottwalker (talk) 12:25, 25 April 2012 (UTC)[reply
    ]

Delete. Clear failure of NFCC#8. The only point that this "helps to illustrate" and/or "visibly demonstrates" is that Shakur had been a passenger in a car shortly before the shooting. That does not appear to be a point which needs a visual aid to be adequately understood. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 17:58, 9 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: It is not a needed in the article. Fair use should be reserved for files that are truly needed.
talk to others) 02:52, 10 May 2012 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Bird vembanad.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 24 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned image with unknown subject. --

ЛееСуда. 12:40, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply

]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:BkCpg363Surry.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 24 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unused former userpage image --

ЛееСуда. 13:06, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply

]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Obama Approval Ratings2.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 24 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

DD2K (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log

).

Orphaned image is a near duplicate of

ЛееСуда. 14:28, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply

]

Keep. The Article on the Presidency of Barack Obama could perhaps use this image in the near future. The Mysterious El Willstro (talk) 00:16, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Both images are not needed. They are duplicate, only the colors are different. --

ЛееСуда. 01:50, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply

]

Delete one, irrelevant which one. Duplicative. No need for two. --
Stefan2 (talk) 22:25, 21 April 2012 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Oisin.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 24 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned personal photo --

ЛееСуда. 14:30, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply

]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Oli coldrick.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 24 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan personal photo --

ЛееСуда. 14:32, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply

]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Davey2010.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 24 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Obsolete Davey2010 Talk 14:35, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Op51 032008.PNG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 24 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Logo for a non-notable group. Original article was deleted see:

ЛееСуда. 14:40, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply

]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Originalvrsf.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 24 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned personal photo --

ЛееСуда. 14:53, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply

]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Picture of Lars Jan Zeeuw.jpeg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 24 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned personal photo --

ЛееСуда. 15:12, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply

]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Priyablogbackground2.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 24 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned personal photo --

ЛееСуда. 15:14, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply

]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Priyablogbackground.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 24 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned personal photo --

ЛееСуда. 15:15, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply

]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Max Naylor.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 24 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Picture of myself, uploaded by myself. I request removal of this picture as not useful to any Wikipedia project and also due to the outdated nature of the image. Maxí (talk) 15:20, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Vlcsnap-2009-12-03-16h46m05s113.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 24 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned personal photo --

ЛееСуда. 16:12, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply

]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Final photograph of Felipe Camiroaga, 2 September 2011.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. Although uploading this in good faith, the uploader hasn't provided a convincing reason why this image is particularly educational. How does seeing the last photograph of this person add to one's understanding of his life or death? If it were particularly famous (i.e., famous enough to deserve its own mention in the article), then it would be worth keeping, but as is, it's just another photograph that happens to be shortly before his death. Magog the Ogre (talk) 21:30, 10 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free photograph of a person boarding a plane, used with the rationale that it is "the last one known of Camiroaga before dying in a plane crash". Fails

WP:NFCC#8, because even though it is connected to this important event, it doesn't significantly contribute to understanding it. Not otherwise the object of commentary. Article has several other, free photographs of the person. Fut.Perf. ☼ 16:34, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply

]

Keep As certain IP notes above in the nomination for deletion of Tu Pac's last photograph, this is the last one of "a notable person prior to his notable murder." I think it helps illustrate the event itself which is described in the Death section of the aforementioned article. Diego talk 02:04, 20 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete This is not an article about the person boarding airplanes. --
Stefan2 (talk) 12:48, 20 April 2012 (UTC)[reply
]
- Comment I've never seen an article about anyone "boarding airplanes." The person died in the plane pictured. Diego talk 17:15, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete before a horrible precedent is set. Public figures are photographed frequently, if not daily. A "final picture before the subject's death" fails points one and eight of
WP:NFCC. The individual was alive on the day of their death. Do we need a non-free image to show that? No, no we don't. — ξ ^xplicit 00:51, 24 April 2012 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete. The nominator's analysis is exactly right. Any image of an event "helps illustrate" the event; NFCC policy sets a much more restrictive standard. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 18:01, 9 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Per nom.
talk to others) 02:53, 10 May 2012 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Federal Signal 2001 SRNB.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 24 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned photo is low quality and is easily replaced by --

ЛееСуда. 16:42, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply

]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Felipe Menegaz Sig.svg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 24 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned image is just plain text, (fancy font), but not an actual signature. no encyclopedic value --

ЛееСуда. 16:44, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply

]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Filippo Catalano in 1908.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 24 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned image is low quality, low resolution and due to size has no encyclopedic use. --

ЛееСуда. 16:51, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply

]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Fish heart schematic.svg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 24 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned image (not good SVG) is currently replaceable by

ЛееСуда. 16:53, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply

]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Fish heart schematic2.svg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 24 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned image (not good SVG) is currently replaceable by

ЛееСуда. 16:53, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply

]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Four-x.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 24 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Image is replaceable by plain text. --

ЛееСуда. 17:06, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply

]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Four-x-more.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 24 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Image is replaceable by plain text. --

ЛееСуда. 17:06, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply

]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Fox profil.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 24 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned personal photo --

ЛееСуда. 17:11, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply

]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Friday12thmarch07MORPHING.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 24 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned image is so low quality that one cannot identify the subject. No encyclopedic value as such. --

ЛееСуда. 17:13, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply

]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Sean Carver.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 24 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unused photo. No foreseeable use as article has since been deleted. Cloudbound (talk) 17:23, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:SeattlePI-EconomyDoubleThink.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 24 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unused photo. No foreseeable use. Cloudbound (talk) 17:26, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Jeep Swenson 1996.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 24 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unused photo. Out of project scope. Cloudbound (talk) 17:28, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Sebref.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 24 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unused. Low quality. Cloudbound (talk) 17:30, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Sebcl.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 24 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unused. Low quality. Cloudbound (talk) 17:32, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Bxda.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 24 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unused. Low quality. Cloudbound (talk) 17:33, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:GeorgeKuchar 01.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 24 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan image with no encyclopedic value --

ЛееСуда. 17:39, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply

]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Secret page barnstar Cuyler91093.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 24 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unused user-created image. Cloudbound (talk) 17:47, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Sector7.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 24 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unused screenshot. Little foreseeable use. Cloudbound (talk) 17:49, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Securitisation.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 24 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unused. Little foreseeable use. Cloudbound (talk) 17:51, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Security Framework.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 24 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unused. Little foreseeable use. Cloudbound (talk) 17:58, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Gokussj2 2.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 24 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fanfic drawing with no encyclopedic value --

ЛееСуда. 17:58, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply

]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Security Triangle.001.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 24 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unused. Little foreseeable use. Cloudbound (talk) 18:00, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:See What I'm Saying1.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 24 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unused poster. Superceded in use by File:SWIS onesheet.jpg. Cloudbound (talk) 18:05, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Grandlakes.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 24 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned image with not a good enough quality to show subject. --

ЛееСуда. 20:52, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply

]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Greg Shot.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 24 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned personal photo --

ЛееСуда. 21:13, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply

]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Gwion Russell 2008.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 24 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned personal photo --

ЛееСуда. 21:21, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply

]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:40tude-dialog programmfenster.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 24 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unused screenshot. Little foreseeable use. Cloudbound (talk) 21:24, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:4-yearplan.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 24 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unused screenshot. Little foreseeable use. Cloudbound (talk) 21:25, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Gwion Russell Modelling.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 24 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned personal photo --

ЛееСуда. 21:26, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply

]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:795px-Europe map armenia.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 24 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unused map. Little foreseeable use. Cloudbound (talk) 21:28, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:800px-KB United States Dvorak.svg.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 24 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unused. Little foreseeable use. Cloudbound (talk) 21:29, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:A Watts.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 24 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unused photo. No foreseeable use. Cloudbound (talk) 21:39, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Acetamide.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 24 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unused. Superceded in use by File:Acetamide skeletal.svg. Cloudbound (talk) 21:48, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Acetylcholine3d.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 24 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unused. Superceded in use by File:ACh-stick.png. Cloudbound (talk) 21:50, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Adamrenie.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 24 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unused user photo. Cloudbound (talk) 21:53, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Adana map.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 24 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unused map. Little foreseeable use. Cloudbound (talk) 21:55, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:AdaptiveFilterH.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 24 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unused. Little foreseeable use. Cloudbound (talk) 21:56, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Adrian Voyd.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 24 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unused photo. No foreseeable use. Cloudbound (talk) 21:58, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:HBP.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 24 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

nearly orphaned image buried in archives of user talk page. no need for this anymore. --

ЛееСуда. 22:04, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply

]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Aida 14.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 24 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unused. No foreseeable use. Cloudbound (talk) 22:07, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:HeatherTung07.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 24 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned personal photo --

ЛееСуда. 22:09, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply

]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Hemoglobin revised 3.PNG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 24 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned image is replaced by the better quality, albeit color change image:

ЛееСуда. 22:10, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply

]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Spanish genocide1.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 24 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unneeded. Shadowed Commons file is better.

Stefan2 (talk) 22:29, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply

]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Ogi Jun Infobox.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 24 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free TV episode screenshot, used in infobox. Apparently random scene, not the object of specific commentary, no obvious relation to anything in the article text, doesn't make any particular contribution for understanding the article. Fails NFCC#8. FUR only states image is "for use in the infobox", thus essentially admitting it's merely an image for the sake of having an image. Fut.Perf. ☼ 22:33, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Wave.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 24 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Danielpop10 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log

).

Unused. Little foreseeable use.

Stefan2 (talk) 22:34, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply

]

Delete. Why was this image uploaded in the first place? The Mysterious El Willstro (talk) 00:22, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

STRONG DELETE. This animation is totally pointless, and adds absolutely no encyclopedic value to Wikipedia whatsoever. Jdaniels15 (talk) 20:34, 20 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.