Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2012 February 6

< February 5	February 7 >

February 6

File:090 albanian graves kosovo.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:06, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[email protected] (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log

).

Orphan, can't see use :Jay8g

WPIM 01:00, 6 February 2012 (UTC)[reply

]

You really can't see a use for photographs of "graves of Albanians killed by Serb security forces" during the Kosovo War? ▫ JohnnyMrNinja 11:08, 6 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:10.5.07CityCenterLobbyByLuigiNovi.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: } SPEEDY DELETED, F8; see File:National Amusements City Center 15 Cinema De Lux - Movie Theater Lobby - White Plains, New York.jpg. postdlf (talk) 21:21, 6 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan, can't see use :Jay8g

WPIM 01:09, 6 February 2012 (UTC)[reply

]

Do you mean that you can't see any use other than the article that the image is in (

ncd}}, but that has nothing to do with the rationale for deletion. Please look at the images before nominating them; once an image is gone there is little chance of it coming back. ▫ JohnnyMrNinja 11:00, 6 February 2012 (UTC)[reply

]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:WikiProject SpongeBob logo.svg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:06, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned file. Not CC-Licensed. Possble Nickelodeon or Viacom's copyright violation. JJ98 (talk) 05:07, 6 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This image is trademarked, not copyrighted. Text this short cannot be copyrighted, and we are free to use trademarks as we are offering information and not a competing service/product. ▫ JohnnyMrNinja 10:50, 6 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The image isn't merely text; it definitely has a graphic aspect to it that is copyrightable (however marginally). postdlf (talk) 21:18, 6 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Well, the SBSP WikiProject is a work group now, so this logo is basically unneeded anyway. Although I'm sad to see it go, it's just a needless trademark infringement as I see it. —Airhogs777 (complaints • evidence • alibi) @WikiShrek 00:28, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:JahshanJentzen02.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as

F10 by RHaworth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:06, 6 February 2012 (UTC)[reply

]

This is an award citation by National Association of Medical Examiners. Even though, the text of the letter may be free, I think, the logo of National Association of Medical Examiners is copyrighted. The user uses his user page as a resume. I don't see any encyclopedic value in this but I am not sure. All comments are welcome. Sumanch (talk) 07:29, 6 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Massachusetts coat of arms.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:06, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate of File:Coat of arms of Massachusetts.svg - redirect should be setup instead. Varnent (talk) 09:39, 6 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note:
(User:90) (talk) 23:24, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Temporary placeholder image.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:06, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Placeholder logo for an article about a website the does not appear to exist any more. We have better placeholder images; black text on white does not stand out on WP pages, so there this is not a good image for gauging page development. ▫ JohnnyMrNinja 10:41, 6 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Move to commons a different placeholder image if people choose it. 70.24.247.54 (talk) 07:53, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Vulpes vulpes - Common Image.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It was uploaded with the strange text "Common Image", but the uploader also released it under a "self" license, so I'll

WP:AGF. This is a very nice image, but the small size makes it undesirable compared to the many images we have at Commons. Not many are as well shot, but all are far larger, so ultimately offer more knowledge of the subject. ▫ JohnnyMrNinja 10:46, 6 February 2012 (UTC)[reply

]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:You are editing my USERPAGE.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

User upload only used in userspace. The uploader is now indefinitely blocked for uploading copyright violations. This file does not have any encyclopedic value. Alpha_Quadrant ^(talk) 19:28, 6 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Nickpic 120.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Extremely low quality, unclear encyclopedic value. (ESkog)^(Talk) 19:33, 6 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Hofwinterjoe.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Low quality, unclear encyclopedic value, possibly nonfree since copyrighted design is the focus of the image. (ESkog)^(Talk) 19:35, 6 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Edinburghlogo.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A higher quality file is available on commons at File:Edinburgh Council.svg. Alpha_Quadrant ^(talk) 23:54, 6 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.