Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2012 July 16

< July 15	July 17 >

July 16

File:George Harrison - You album cover.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:00, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

decorative non-free image. There is precisely zero mention of the covers, or this alternative cover, in the article and I cannot see what, particularly what of significance, this images adds to reader's understanding. Without sourced commentary about the image itself this clearly fails

WP:NFCC#8 Peripitus (Talk) 12:52, 8 July 2012 (UTC)[reply

]

Relisted
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — ξ ^xplicit 00:16, 16 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisting note: Original nomination was removed by Twinkle malfunction. — ξ ^xplicit 00:16, 16 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Poynting sig.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:00, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unneeded, see

Stefan2 (talk) 00:53, 16 July 2012 (UTC)[reply

]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:PhysX logo.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:00, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Stefan2 (talk) 01:05, 16 July 2012 (UTC)[reply

]

Speedy-delete per F8: Nominator's assessment is valid. The Commons version is better. Codename Lisa (talk) 10:27, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:PhysX logo.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:00, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Stefan2 (talk) 01:05, 16 July 2012 (UTC)[reply

]

Speedy-delete per F8: Nominator's assessment is valid. The Commons version is better. Codename Lisa (talk) 10:27, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Excellent Horse-Like Lady.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:00, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

According to the fair use rationale, this is used to illustrate a song. However, looking at how it is really used, it seems that this is in fact used as an unfree photo of a living person. As such, it fails

Stefan2 (talk) 05:56, 16 July 2012 (UTC)[reply

]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Vimochanam.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:00, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see how a page with lots of text in Tamil would help me understanding an article about a film. Fails

Stefan2 (talk) 07:35, 16 July 2012 (UTC)[reply

]

Dude, it's just a promotional poster/advertisement abt the film. Dont delete it. Kailash29792 (talk) 13:37, 16 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Admin, why won't u reply?! Kailash29792 (talk) 04:47, 18 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Volvo OR Logo RTW Stack.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as

F4 by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:00, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply

]

Stefan2 (talk) 07:38, 16 July 2012 (UTC)[reply

]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Domarski jan.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:00, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

no evidence that photo was published without a clear copyright notice Oleola (talk) 10:04, 16 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Vegas Pro 10.0.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:00, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi.

I might be wrong, but this image does not seem to have the contextual significance required by

WP:NFCC

, item #8.

Best regards,
Codename Lisa (talk) 10:52, 16 July 2012 (UTC) Codename Lisa (talk) 10:52, 16 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Map of the Eurojackpot countries.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:00, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Stefan2 (talk) 14:27, 16 July 2012 (UTC)[reply

]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Vijayanagara flag.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Wrong forum. The file is on Commons. Please nominate it for deletion there if you still feel it should be deleted. AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:05, 16 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unencyclopedic Rockoprem (talk) 16:49, 16 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:LIN Media logo.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Speedy delete — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 11:52, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Stefan2 (talk) 19:23, 16 July 2012 (UTC)[reply

]

Delete. I uploaded LIN Media.svg and strongly agree due to redundancy issues. Fairly OddParents Freak (Fairlyoddparents1234)

18:16, 21 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Kdabramundofoxbusad.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:00, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Fails

Stefan2 (talk) 19:30, 16 July 2012 (UTC)[reply

]

OK, I'm sure I'm missing it, but is there a palatable Wiki solution for this that doesn't violate anything? I was only trying to help the topic with some illustration, the first promotion of which I'd seen so far, which would help those not completely familiar with the topic. Awtribute (talk) 17:15, 17 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Killer Love (deluxe album cover).png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:00, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Fails

Stefan2 (talk) 19:33, 16 July 2012 (UTC)[reply

]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Frasier Crane.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:00, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Very obvious

Stefan2 (talk) 21:17, 16 July 2012 (UTC)[reply

]

Just in case: [3]. Although it is made by NBC, the fact that this photo is licensed to Getty Images indicates a higher commercial value of this image, and higher commercial value would triumph any other intent in Wikipedia. Proof of author's original intent is so obscure because, back then, the internet was at its lower stage. Seriously, I tried saving File:Jaleel White Steve Urkel.jpg (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) but failed. Even I did not vote for or against File:Cheers cast photo.jpg (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs), but it got deleted without votes. One user assumes that appearance in Getty has no effect on Wikipedia use of a commercially valuable image. However, the nominator says that prior publication does not erase or lower high commercial value. Here's the replacement: File:Frasier Crane Shrink Wrap radio station KACL.jpg. --George Ho (talk) 21:22, 16 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. There's no possibility of replacing this with a nonfree image, and because only NBC is able to produce images of its characters, there's not even a possibility of replacing it with a nonfree image from a different source. Who's going to say which images are excessively commercially viable and which ones aren't? NBC is in the TV business, not the photography business, so claims of fair use for all images of this character are going to have equally good or equally bad effects on commercial use. Nyttend (talk) 21:35, 16 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- I don't know. This image is of an actor. There is no slight or tiny shred of character aspects visualized. Even when Kelsey Grammer has a dog Eddie in other photos, even a business suit does not represent a character... right? --George Ho (talk) 21:57, 16 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  - The business focus of NBC is irrelevant. The fact that NBC is actively selling individual copies of this exact image is what matters here. --
    Stefan2 (talk) 11:22, 17 July 2012 (UTC)[reply
    ]

Delete. The image is nonfree and is being marketed for use both by its copyright holder and by Getty Images. It is obviously replaceable by a well-selected screenshot which, although also nonfree, would not be subject to the same marketing considerations. The point that this appears to be a publicity shot of an actor in a stock pose rather than clearly an actor in character is also well taken. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 00:47, 17 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Comment See also the similar request at
Stefan2 (talk) 11:51, 17 July 2012 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.