Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2012 September 17

< September 16	September 18 >

September 17

File:GD vs Bmeg.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by King of Hearts (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:01, 25 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Fails

Stefan2 (talk) 13:26, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply

]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Latineurope.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by King of Hearts (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:01, 25 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Iamandrewrice (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log

).

OR, LQ, redundant to and less precise than commons:File:Latineurope.jpg (same file name) anyway Magog the Ogre (t • c) 19:34, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Mason1.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:05, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Fails

Stefan2 (talk) 22:24, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply

]

Keep. A smaller version of the file has been uploaded (3b). A copyright tag has been added (10b). As far as
WP:NFCC#8, the image depicts Marjaree Mason, whose murder led to the founding of the Center that bears her name, the Marjaree Mason Center. It would not be possible to produce a free image of her as she is deceased. Gobōnobo ⁺ ^c 07:50, 24 September 2012 (UTC)[reply
]
But the article is about the centre, not about a person. Deletion of the image doesn't affect your understanding of the centre at all; you don't need to know what she looks like in order to know that she was murdered. --
Stefan2 (talk) 09:26, 25 September 2012 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete. Decorative use. The understanding of the article is not affected by the omission of this image. — ξ ^xplicit 01:16, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Udigits-gameplay-add-last-warning.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic (relates to deleted article Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/UDigits) Calliopejen1 (talk) 23:28, 17 September 2012 (UTC) Also nominating the following for the same reason:[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:UDBHAV.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:14, 28 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, uploader's only contribution, no stated source, the

half-toning suggests it may be a scan of a copyrighted source Calliopejen1 (talk) 23:35, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply

]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Udhamsingh 1.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:03, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, dead source (just to the bare image anyways), no reason given that this photo would be public domain Calliopejen1 (talk) 23:36, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:UDMS.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:03, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 23:37, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Udub.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:03, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

user's only contribution, no stated source, publicity-type photo for rock band. i'd delete lacking evidence of permission. Calliopejen1 (talk) 23:39, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Unceasing waves 3 - phase 2.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:03, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, no source for base map, no source for troop movements Calliopejen1 (talk) 23:43, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Uncensored-Wikileaks.svg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:03, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, probably a copyright violation of both the underlying julian assange photo and the wikileaks logo Calliopejen1 (talk) 23:44, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Uncertain Elephant.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:03, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 23:44, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Uncertainty Theory Axiom.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:03, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, no need to have this around - should be represented using plain text and

WP:MATH symbols Calliopejen1 (talk) 23:45, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply

]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Uncertainty1.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:03, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, superseded by svg Calliopejen1 (talk) 23:45, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Uncharted 2 Fortune Hunter Edition.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:03, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, apparent copyright violation Calliopejen1 (talk) 23:46, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Uncle CC.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:03, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 23:46, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Uncle Paul fig copy.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:03, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 23:47, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Uncle Sam BW.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: No consensus This whole deletion discussion seems to turn on whether wpclipart's assertion that they verify that all of their images are public domain is "good enough" for that site to be listed as a source. Besides looking at the discussion here, I've also checked for other deletion discussions linking to wpclipart and for other images linking it as a source, and found little to indicate that anyone has a problem with it either here or on Commons; wpclipart is even linked from Wikipedia:Public domain image resources, which gives some legitimacy. Since I don't see any really compelling "Keep" arguments but the "Delete" arguments are even weaker, I'm just going to close this as "no consensus" with a recommendation to move it over to Commons since it's orphaned here. Anomie ⚔ 02:18, 8 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, clearly based on PD work but i'm not sure that the source site is a reliable indicator of the copyright status of this particular clip art adaptation Calliopejen1 (talk) 23:48, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Source webpage clearly states "...artwork for schoolkids and others that is free of copyright.. All the images here are Public Domain..." Even if the website is lying, which we have absolutely no reason to beliveve whatsoever, the image would still be in the public domain, as the original Uncle Sam image this is based on was done by J. M. Flagg in 1917. This would be earlier than the 1924 copyright cut off. Sf46 (talk) 12:58, 18 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that the original Uncle Sam image is in the public domain, but this is a derivative work that could attract its own copyright - converting something to black and white lines requires creativity. I don't think that website looks reputable, either--it doesn't seem to indicate the sources for the images it hosts. Calliopejen1 (talk) 05:48, 19 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Move to commons -- 76.65.131.248 (talk) 02:44, 19 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. No valid source. wpclipart.com doesn't even indicate the source for their images, that it's impossible to verify if this is indeed in the public domain. — ξ ^xplicit 01:16, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Move to commons. We know the image of Uncle Sam is in the public domain. There doesn't appear to be anything here that qualifies this for a derivative work copyright. -- AyaK (talk) 06:11, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I followed back to the source, and I'm unconvinced that the paper trail is there for us to verify that we can actually use it. As I see it, this not a straight duplicate of the image that this is based on. It's different enough to be noticeable. So I wouldn't dismiss it out of hand quite so easily. Then looking at the site it came from, there is no author information, and more importantly, the language about what sort of license that they're using is missing. The best I could find is "free of copyright concerns", which could very well mean "all rights reserved but we just won't sue you". Not "this work is released to the public domain" or "Creative Commons Attribution ShareAlike" or something to that effect. So at this point, it seems that we can't keep it. SchuminWeb (Talk) 11:48, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

So you don't trust the listing at the site's FAQ page, which says ""These images are public domain (PD), and that means they can be used and edited for whatever purpose you wish, personal or commercial. No attrribution or linking is required."? The page also includes a complete list of sources, although I don't have the time to search through them to find where this image originates. -- AyaK (talk) 07:21, 2 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Uncle sam cropped.300.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:03, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, not clear what this is a photo of - possibly copyrighted underlying artwork Calliopejen1 (talk) 23:49, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Uncle Tom and Uncle George.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep and add a fair use rationale. — ξ ^xplicit 01:16, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, something published in 1928 in Ireland is not necessarily in the public domain Calliopejen1 (talk) 23:50, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Convert to fairuse now used in the articles about these two people, since they are both dead and both articles didn't have an image. -- 76.65.131.248 (talk) 03:14, 19 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The original claim of the author keeps the copyright status unclear. Is he really the owner of the photo used in his book/website? Is the photographer of the picture known (and did he/she die that long ago to get the photo out of copyright)? As long as that is unclear, no risk can be taken. Did anyone already contact the Irish Times for verification? The Banner _talk 07:52, 19 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment if it's converted to fairuse, the risk would be removed -- 76.65.131.248 (talk) 22:13, 19 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  - Are you sure that the Irish copyright laws are compatible with fair-use? The Banner _talk 16:27, 21 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    - Does it matter? Wikipedia is based out of the US, and is defined by US copyright law, not Irish ones. -- 76.65.131.248 (talk) 12:54, 22 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
      - Yes, it does. The world is bigger then the USA and even Wikipedia has to adhere to Irish laws when those laws are applicable. You can not ignore local laws just because USA laws are more convienent. Read the documentation available, when Wikipedia finds itself in a conflict between USA-laws and local laws, the strictest prevails. The Banner _talk 13:03, 22 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
        The policy is to make a website which is illegal to access outside the United States because of copyright issues. If you wish to change this, propose something else at
        Stefan2 (talk) 13:08, 22 September 2012 (UTC)[reply
        ]
        Do you really say "illegal" or did you make a mistake? — Preceding unsigned comment added by [[User:{{{1}}}|{{{1}}}]] ([[User talk:{{{1}}}|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/{{{1}}}|contribs]])
        I might be wrong, but I seem to understand that it is in some countries illegal to watch streaming video on a website if the video violates the copyright law of the country where the person watching the video is located. I would assume that the same thing applies to images hosted on Wikipedia: if the use of an image is illegal in some country, then it may be illegal to access an article using that image from the country where the use is illegal. --
        Stefan2 (talk) 09:50, 23 September 2012 (UTC)[reply
        ]

- - - - WP:NFCC, if it meets our NFCC then it could be used for fairuse on Wikipedia. WP:Non-US copyrights, we follow US Copyright laws, it is up to republishers to make sure content from Wikipedia is compatible with local copyright laws. There are hundreds of different copyright laws in the world, making Wikipedia compatible with all of them means that almost everything on Wikipedia would need to be deleted. (GFDL/CCbySA is not compatible with everyone's copyright laws) -- 76.65.131.248 (talk) 21:54, 22 September 2012 (UTC)[reply
        ]
        Start reading your own links, mr. IP. The Banner _talk 02:41, 23 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

For images to be in Wikimedia Commons, they must be in the public domain both in their home country and in the United States. For Wikipedia, they must be in the public domain in the United States alone, or if copyrighted in the US then a fair use rationale must be written and applicable. The Banner, your views are not actually policy on en.wiki. If this is an appropriate image to use as fair use (I haven't looked into this, so I can't comment) it should be kept. My nomination was on the basis that it was a possibly non-free orphan image. Calliopejen1 (talk) 21:33, 27 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:UncleChuck.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:03, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, no source for chuck norris image Calliopejen1 (talk) 23:50, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:UndBecks court.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:03, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic (relates to Undbecks) Calliopejen1 (talk) 23:52, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:UNdefined.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:03, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 23:52, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Undefined3a.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:03, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic (relates to [Undefined]]) Calliopejen1 (talk) 23:52, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Undelete markup.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:03, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, unclear how this could ever be useful Calliopejen1 (talk) 23:53, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Under18.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as

F8 by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:03, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply

]

Orphaned, not clear why this would be useful, could eaisly be recreated if needed Calliopejen1 (talk) 23:53, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Move to commons doesn't need to be recreated if we move it to commons. It is PD. Could be used on the topic of age restriction for some WikiVersity course. -- 76.65.131.248 (talk) 02:40, 19 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Under The Sun Studios SunSmall.GIF

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:03, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic (relates to Under the Sun Studios) Calliopejen1 (talk) 23:53, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Under The Sun Studios Banner.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:03, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic (relates to Under the Sun Studios) Calliopejen1 (talk) 23:54, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Undernest.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:03, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, apparent copyvio Calliopejen1 (talk) 23:54, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Si mollier.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:03, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, unclear what this is, too small to be useful Calliopejen1 (talk) 23:56, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Uniformjack.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:03, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 23:56, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Uniformjack2.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:03, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 23:57, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Unencyclopedic2.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:03, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 23:57, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comment isn't that some sort of copyright violation? -- 76.65.131.248 (talk) 02:37, 19 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- These images might be ineligible for copyright. In either case, they are useless, so let's delete them regardless of the copyright status. --
  Stefan2 (talk) 09:29, 25 September 2012 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Unencyclopedice2.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:03, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 23:57, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comment isn't that some sort of copyright violation? -- 76.65.131.248 (talk) 02:37, 19 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Unemploymentmrch11.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:03, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, out of date, no source for data Calliopejen1 (talk) 23:58, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Underwater.pdf

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:03, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, unclear encyclopedic value, seems to be a long research paper in Tamil Calliopejen1 (talk) 23:59, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comment isn't this kind of stuff supposed to reside on WikiSource? -- 76.65.131.248 (talk) 02:36, 19 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Undignifedoffering.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:03, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 23:59, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.