Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2013 May 23

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 09:08, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:ST-TNG Captain's Holiday.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Cburnett (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR:

• Keep All It's covered by fair use law.[1] The image is not decorative it helps to identify the episode, illustrate key plot points, and provides visual reference to the episodes thematic elements, and style. After all this is a visual medium and a picture is worth a thousands words as they say. I believe that the Star Trek episode pages could use more illustrations across the board. I also don't believe that one user should arbitrarily mass submit images for deletion. The use of images to illustrate a TV episode is very common site wide and generally held as acceptable and legal. --Mccordscvs (talk) 10:07, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep You understand the episode more seeing the image from it. Mass duplicate nominations got mass duplicate responses. Dream Focus 01:20, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. I respect your good faith in submitting this batch of deletion nominations, but IMO the issue needs to be reviewed by the community before any of the images in question are deleted. This comment applies as well to the deletions you proposed yesterday (2013 May 22), and I will be placing a similar note there. — Richwales (no relation to Jimbo) 04:54, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per Richwales (see File:STMatterofHonor.jpg. As stated by others below, these images are illustrative of the episodes and increase understanding, so their use seems appropriate. Such images are so widely used in episode articles that the wider community seems to support their use, so wider community discussion as proposed by Richwales seems necessary. --AussieLegend (✉) 16:00, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Clear failure of
  WP:NFCC#8. None of the keep arguments indicate what significant increase in understanding this image generates or what detrimental effects would occur from its omission.—Kww(talk) 00:50, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Keep The image seems quite good at illustrating the topic of shore leave; the main characters and their close interaction; the unusual appearance of a Ferengi; the distinctive appearance of Picard; &c. Prior knowledge of such things cannot be assumed as the reader may have zero knowledge of Star Trek and its features (I have a friend like that - he's never seen a James Bond movie, for example). As the article stands by itself, it is appropriate to illustrate such prominent features which appear in the episode and so
  WP:NFCC#8 is satisfied. The only issue is whether there's a better image. If you Google for images of "Captain's Holiday", Google readily provides a good selection of still images. This demonstrates that such images are considered fair use by an information provider such as Google or Wikipedia. Warden (talk) 18:58, 27 May 2013 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete - does not significantly add to understanding of episode, and omission would not be detrimental to understanding of episode. --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 04:10, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 09:08, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:ENTcanamar.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by (aeropagitica) (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR:

• Keep All It's covered by fair use law.[2] The image is not decorative it helps to identify the episode, illustrate key plot points, and provides visual reference to the episodes thematic elements, and style. After all this is a visual medium and a picture is worth a thousands words as they say. I believe that the Star Trek episode pages could use more illustrations across the board. I also don't believe that one user should arbitrarily mass submit images for deletion. The use of images to illustrate a TV episode is very common site wide and generally held as acceptable and legal. --Mccordscvs (talk) 10:07, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep all and stop mass nominating things. You understand the episode more seeing the image from it. Dream Focus 01:29, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per Richwales (see File:STMatterofHonor.jpg. As stated by others below, these images are illustrative of the episodes and increase understanding, so their use seems appropriate. Such images are so widely used in episode articles that the wider community seems to support their use, so wider community discussion as proposed by Richwales seems necessary. --AussieLegend (✉) 16:00, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Clear failure of
  WP:NFCC#8. None of the keep arguments indicate what significant increase in understanding this image generates or what detrimental effects would occur from its omission.—Kww(talk) 00:50, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 09:08, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:ST ByAnyOtherName.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Cyberia23 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR:

• Keep All It's covered by fair use law.[3] The image is not decorative it helps to identify the episode, illustrate key plot points, and provides visual reference to the episodes thematic elements, and style. After all this is a visual medium and a picture is worth a thousands words as they say. I believe that the Star Trek episode pages could use more illustrations across the board. I also don't believe that one user should arbitrarily mass submit images for deletion. The use of images to illustrate a TV episode is very common site wide and generally held as acceptable and legal. --Mccordscvs (talk) 10:07, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep all and stop mass nominating things. You understand the episode more seeing the image from it. Dream Focus 01:29, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per Richwales (see File:STMatterofHonor.jpg. As stated by others below, these images are illustrative of the episodes and increase understanding, so their use seems appropriate. Such images are so widely used in episode articles that the wider community seems to support their use, so wider community discussion as proposed by Richwales seems necessary. --AussieLegend (✉) 16:00, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Clear failure of
  WP:NFCC#8. None of the keep arguments indicate what significant increase in understanding this image generates or what detrimental effects would occur from its omission.—Kww(talk) 00:51, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete - does not significantly add to understanding of episode, and omission would not be detrimental to understanding of episode. --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 04:11, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:02, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:ST-TNG Bloodlines.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Cburnett (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR:

• Keep All It's covered by fair use law.[4] The image is not decorative it helps to identify the episode, illustrate key plot points, and provides visual reference to the episodes thematic elements, and style. After all this is a visual medium and a picture is worth a thousands words as they say. I believe that the Star Trek episode pages could use more illustrations across the board. I also don't believe that one user should arbitrarily mass submit images for deletion. The use of images to illustrate a TV episode is very common site wide and generally held as acceptable and legal. --Mccordscvs (talk) 10:07, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep all and stop mass nominating things. You understand the episode more seeing the image from it. Dream Focus 01:29, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per Richwales (see File:STMatterofHonor.jpg. As stated by others below, these images are illustrative of the episodes and increase understanding, so their use seems appropriate. Such images are so widely used in episode articles that the wider community seems to support their use, so wider community discussion as proposed by Richwales seems necessary. --AussieLegend (✉) 16:00, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Clear failure of
  WP:NFCC#8. None of the keep arguments indicate what significant increase in understanding this image generates or what detrimental effects would occur from its omission.—Kww(talk) 00:51, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:02, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:ST-TNG Birthright Part 2.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Cburnett (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR:

• Keep All It's covered by fair use law.[5] The image is not decorative it helps to identify the episode, illustrate key plot points, and provides visual reference to the episodes thematic elements, and style. After all this is a visual medium and a picture is worth a thousands words as they say. I believe that the Star Trek episode pages could use more illustrations across the board. I also don't believe that one user should arbitrarily mass submit images for deletion. The use of images to illustrate a TV episode is very common site wide and generally held as acceptable and legal. --Mccordscvs (talk) 12:50, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep all and stop mass nominating things. You understand the episode more seeing the image from it. Dream Focus 01:29, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per Richwales (see File:STMatterofHonor.jpg. As stated by others below, these images are illustrative of the episodes and increase understanding, so their use seems appropriate. Such images are so widely used in episode articles that the wider community seems to support their use, so wider community discussion as proposed by Richwales seems necessary. --AussieLegend (✉) 16:00, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Clear failure of
  WP:NFCC#8. None of the keep arguments indicate what significant increase in understanding this image generates or what detrimental effects would occur from its omission.—Kww(talk) 00:52, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:02, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:STBoobyTrap.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Cyberia23 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR:

• Keep All It's covered by fair use law.[6] The image is not decorative it helps to identify the episode, illustrate key plot points, and provides visual reference to the episodes thematic elements, and style. After all this is a visual medium and a picture is worth a thousands words as they say. I believe that the Star Trek episode pages could use more illustrations across the board. I also don't believe that one user should arbitrarily mass submit images for deletion. The use of images to illustrate a TV episode is very common site wide and generally held as acceptable and legal. --Mccordscvs (talk) 12:50, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep all and stop mass nominating things. You understand the episode more seeing the image from it. Dream Focus 01:29, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per Richwales (see File:STMatterofHonor.jpg. As stated by others below, these images are illustrative of the episodes and increase understanding, so their use seems appropriate. Such images are so widely used in episode articles that the wider community seems to support their use, so wider community discussion as proposed by Richwales seems necessary. --AussieLegend (✉) 16:00, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Clear failure of
  WP:NFCC#8. None of the keep arguments indicate what significant increase in understanding this image generates or what detrimental effects would occur from its omission.—Kww(talk) 00:53, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Borderland (ENT episode).jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by とある白い猫 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR:

• Keep All It's covered by fair use law.[7] The image is not decorative it helps to identify the episode, illustrate key plot points, and provides visual reference to the episodes thematic elements, and style. After all this is a visual medium and a picture is worth a thousands words as they say. I believe that the Star Trek episode pages could use more illustrations across the board. I also don't believe that one user should arbitrarily mass submit images for deletion. The use of images to illustrate a TV episode is very common site wide and generally held as acceptable and legal. --Mccordscvs (talk) 12:50, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep all and stop mass nominating things. You understand the episode more seeing the image from it. Dream Focus 01:29, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per Richwales (see File:STMatterofHonor.jpg. As stated by others below, these images are illustrative of the episodes and increase understanding, so their use seems appropriate. Such images are so widely used in episode articles that the wider community seems to support their use, so wider community discussion as proposed by Richwales seems necessary. --AussieLegend (✉) 16:00, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Unfortunately in your mass nomination you didn't stop to read each fair use description. This image is used to help understand the makeup and costuming in this episode which is discussed in the article itself. Miyagawa (talk) 18:09, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Clear failure of
  WP:NFCC#8. None of the keep arguments indicate what significant increase in understanding this image generates or what detrimental effects would occur from its omission. Miyagawa at least makes a stab at it, but the word "skimpy" certainly suffices as a description of the outfit: a picture of "skimpy" is gratuitous.—Kww(talk) 00:55, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete: The image presumably depicts something in the plot -- perhaps "Soong attempts to escape, but Archer recaptures him"? But the image does not significantly aid in understanding that section. Nothing in the "Reception" section is depicted in the image. In the "Production" section, the actress "described the costume as slightly skimpier than she was used to", which is depicted in the image, but only in a cursory way. – Quadell ^(talk) 12:24, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Note to Keep voters: If you feel a screenshot passes
  WP:NFCC#8, it will not help to complain about mass nominations or defend the legality of the image use, since these are not relevant. Instead, if you could identify which specific sections of prose in the body of the article are depicted by the screenshot, it will help make the closing admin's job much easier. – Quadell ^(talk) 12:24, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:02, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bound (ENT episode).jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by とある白い猫 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR:

• Keep All It's covered by fair use law.[8] The image is not decorative it helps to identify the episode, illustrate key plot points, and provides visual reference to the episodes thematic elements, and style. After all this is a visual medium and a picture is worth a thousands words as they say. I believe that the Star Trek episode pages could use more illustrations across the board. I also don't believe that one user should arbitrarily mass submit images for deletion. The use of images to illustrate a TV episode is very common site wide and generally held as acceptable and legal. --Mccordscvs (talk) 12:50, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep all and stop mass nominating things. You understand the episode more seeing the image from it. Dream Focus 01:29, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per Richwales (see File:STMatterofHonor.jpg. As stated by others below, these images are illustrative of the episodes and increase understanding, so their use seems appropriate. Such images are so widely used in episode articles that the wider community seems to support their use, so wider community discussion as proposed by Richwales seems necessary. --AussieLegend (✉) 16:00, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Clear failure of
  WP:NFCC#8. None of the keep arguments indicate what significant increase in understanding this image generates or what detrimental effects would occur from its omission.—Kww(talk) 00:56, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:02, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bounty (ENT episode).jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by とある白い猫 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR:

• Keep All It's covered by fair use law.[9] The image is not decorative it helps to identify the episode, illustrate key plot points, and provides visual reference to the episodes thematic elements, and style. After all this is a visual medium and a picture is worth a thousands words as they say. I believe that the Star Trek episode pages could use more illustrations across the board. I also don't believe that one user should arbitrarily mass submit images for deletion. The use of images to illustrate a TV episode is very common site wide and generally held as acceptable and legal. --Mccordscvs (talk) 12:50, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep all and stop mass nominating things. You understand the episode more seeing the image from it. Dream Focus 01:29, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per Richwales (see File:STMatterofHonor.jpg. As stated by others below, these images are illustrative of the episodes and increase understanding, so their use seems appropriate. Such images are so widely used in episode articles that the wider community seems to support their use, so wider community discussion as proposed by Richwales seems necessary. --AussieLegend (✉) 16:00, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Clear failure of
  WP:NFCC#8. None of the keep arguments indicate what significant increase in understanding this image generates or what detrimental effects would occur from its omission.—Kww(talk) 00:56, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:02, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:STBreadCircus.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Cyberia23 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR:

• Keep All It's covered by fair use law.[10] The image is not decorative it helps to identify the episode, illustrate key plot points, and provides visual reference to the episodes thematic elements, and style. After all this is a visual medium and a picture is worth a thousands words as they say. I believe that the Star Trek episode pages could use more illustrations across the board. I also don't believe that one user should arbitrarily mass submit images for deletion. The use of images to illustrate a TV episode is very common site wide and generally held as acceptable and legal. --Mccordscvs (talk) 12:50, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep all and stop mass nominating things. You understand the episode more seeing the image from it. Dream Focus 01:29, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per Richwales (see File:STMatterofHonor.jpg. As stated by others below, these images are illustrative of the episodes and increase understanding, so their use seems appropriate. Such images are so widely used in episode articles that the wider community seems to support their use, so wider community discussion as proposed by Richwales seems necessary. --AussieLegend (✉) 16:00, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Clear failure of
  WP:NFCC#8. None of the keep arguments indicate what significant increase in understanding this image generates or what detrimental effects would occur from its omission.—Kww(talk) 00:57, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Keep: omission would be detrimental to understanding of episode. --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 04:15, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete – Quadell ^(talk) 19:01, 25 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:ST-TNG Brothers Season4.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Leoboudv (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR:

• Keep All It's covered by fair use law.[11] The image is not decorative it helps to identify the episode, illustrate key plot points, and provides visual reference to the episodes thematic elements, and style. After all this is a visual medium and a picture is worth a thousands words as they say. I believe that the Star Trek episode pages could use more illustrations across the board. I also don't believe that one user should arbitrarily mass submit images for deletion. The use of images to illustrate a TV episode is very common site wide and generally held as acceptable and legal. --Mccordscvs (talk) 12:50, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep all and stop mass nominating things. You understand the episode more seeing the image from it. Dream Focus 01:29, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep What's with this mass nominations? --Leoboudv (talk) 01:48, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per Richwales (see File:STMatterofHonor.jpg. As stated by others below, these images are illustrative of the episodes and increase understanding, so their use seems appropriate. Such images are so widely used in episode articles that the wider community seems to support their use, so wider community discussion as proposed by Richwales seems necessary. --AussieLegend (✉) 16:00, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Clear failure of
  WP:NFCC#8. None of the keep arguments indicate what significant increase in understanding this image generates or what detrimental effects would occur from its omission.—Kww(talk) 01:00, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Keep - striking enough image that its removal would be detrimental to episode understanding. --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 04:16, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, the content of the image is not discussed outside the caption. – Quadell ^(talk) 12:26, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Note to Keep voters: If you feel a screenshot passes
  WP:NFCC#8, it will not help to complain about mass nominations or defend the legality of the image use, since these are not relevant. Instead, if you could identify which specific sections of prose in the body of the article are depicted by the screenshot, it will help make the closing admin's job much easier. – Quadell ^(talk) 12:26, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:02, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Carpenter Street.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by とある白い猫 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR:

• Keep All It's covered by fair use law.[12] The image is not decorative it helps to identify the episode, illustrate key plot points, and provides visual reference to the episodes thematic elements, and style. After all this is a visual medium and a picture is worth a thousands words as they say. I believe that the Star Trek episode pages could use more illustrations across the board. I also don't believe that one user should arbitrarily mass submit images for deletion. The use of images to illustrate a TV episode is very common site wide and generally held as acceptable and legal. --Mccordscvs (talk) 12:50, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep all and stop mass nominating things. You understand the episode more seeing the image from it. Dream Focus 01:29, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per Richwales (see File:STMatterofHonor.jpg. As stated by others below, these images are illustrative of the episodes and increase understanding, so their use seems appropriate. Such images are so widely used in episode articles that the wider community seems to support their use, so wider community discussion as proposed by Richwales seems necessary. --AussieLegend (✉) 16:00, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Clear failure of
  WP:NFCC#8. None of the keep arguments indicate what significant increase in understanding this image generates or what detrimental effects would occur from its omission.—Kww(talk) 01:01, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:02, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:STCatspaw.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Cyberia23 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR:

• Keep All It's covered by fair use law.[13] The image is not decorative it helps to identify the episode, illustrate key plot points, and provides visual reference to the episodes thematic elements, and style. After all this is a visual medium and a picture is worth a thousands words as they say. I believe that the Star Trek episode pages could use more illustrations across the board. I also don't believe that one user should arbitrarily mass submit images for deletion. The use of images to illustrate a TV episode is very common site wide and generally held as acceptable and legal. --Mccordscvs (talk) 12:50, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep all and stop mass nominating things. You understand the episode more seeing the image from it. Dream Focus 01:29, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per Richwales (see File:STMatterofHonor.jpg. As stated by others below, these images are illustrative of the episodes and increase understanding, so their use seems appropriate. Such images are so widely used in episode articles that the wider community seems to support their use, so wider community discussion as proposed by Richwales seems necessary. --AussieLegend (✉) 16:00, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Clear failure of
  WP:NFCC#8. None of the keep arguments indicate what significant increase in understanding this image generates or what detrimental effects would occur from its omission.—Kww(talk) 01:02, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete - does not significantly add to understanding of episode, and omission would not be detrimental to understanding of episode. "Woman dangles small Enterprise model from chain" conveys pretty much the same thing. --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 04:18, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:02, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:ST-TNG Cause and Effect.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Artene50 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR:

• Keep All It's covered by fair use law.[14] The image is not decorative it helps to identify the episode, illustrate key plot points, and provides visual reference to the episodes thematic elements, and style. After all this is a visual medium and a picture is worth a thousands words as they say. I believe that the Star Trek episode pages could use more illustrations across the board. I also don't believe that one user should arbitrarily mass submit images for deletion. The use of images to illustrate a TV episode is very common site wide and generally held as acceptable and legal. --Mccordscvs (talk) 12:50, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep all and stop mass nominating things. You understand the episode more seeing the image from it. Dream Focus 01:29, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Retain the image. One understands the episodes more from the image. And stop these mass DR nominations please. --Artene50 (talk) 02:16, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per Richwales (see File:STMatterofHonor.jpg. As stated by others below, these images are illustrative of the episodes and increase understanding, so their use seems appropriate. Such images are so widely used in episode articles that the wider community seems to support their use, so wider community discussion as proposed by Richwales seems necessary. --AussieLegend (✉) 16:00, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Clear failure of
  WP:NFCC#8. None of the keep arguments indicate what significant increase in understanding this image generates or what detrimental effects would occur from its omission.—Kww(talk) 01:01, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete - does not significantly add to understanding of episode, and omission would not be detrimental to understanding of episode. --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 04:19, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:02, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:ST-TNG Chain of Command Part 1.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Cburnett (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR:

• Keep All It's covered by fair use law.[15] The image is not decorative it helps to identify the episode, illustrate key plot points, and provides visual reference to the episodes thematic elements, and style. After all this is a visual medium and a picture is worth a thousands words as they say. I believe that the Star Trek episode pages could use more illustrations across the board. I also don't believe that one user should arbitrarily mass submit images for deletion. The use of images to illustrate a TV episode is very common site wide and generally held as acceptable and legal. --Mccordscvs (talk) 12:50, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep all and stop mass nominating things. You understand the episode more seeing the image from it. Dream Focus 01:29, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per Richwales (see File:STMatterofHonor.jpg. As stated by others below, these images are illustrative of the episodes and increase understanding, so their use seems appropriate. Such images are so widely used in episode articles that the wider community seems to support their use, so wider community discussion as proposed by Richwales seems necessary. --AussieLegend (✉) 16:00, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Clear failure of
  WP:NFCC#8. None of the keep arguments indicate what significant increase in understanding this image generates or what detrimental effects would occur from its omission.—Kww(talk) 01:02, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete - does not significantly add to understanding of episode, and omission would not be detrimental to understanding of episode. --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 04:19, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:02, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:STCharlieX.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Cyberia23 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR:

• Keep All It's covered by fair use law.[16] The image is not decorative it helps to identify the episode, illustrate key plot points, and provides visual reference to the episodes thematic elements, and style. After all this is a visual medium and a picture is worth a thousands words as they say. I believe that the Star Trek episode pages could use more illustrations across the board. I also don't believe that one user should arbitrarily mass submit images for deletion. The use of images to illustrate a TV episode is very common site wide and generally held as acceptable and legal. --Mccordscvs (talk) 12:50, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep all and stop mass nominating things. You understand the episode more seeing the image from it. Dream Focus 01:29, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per Richwales (see File:STMatterofHonor.jpg. As stated by others below, these images are illustrative of the episodes and increase understanding, so their use seems appropriate. Such images are so widely used in episode articles that the wider community seems to support their use, so wider community discussion as proposed by Richwales seems necessary. --AussieLegend (✉) 16:00, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Clear failure of
  WP:NFCC#8. None of the keep arguments indicate what significant increase in understanding this image generates or what detrimental effects would occur from its omission.—Kww(talk) 01:02, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete - does not significantly add to understanding of episode, and omission would not be detrimental to understanding of episode. "Young man with light falling across eyes" would convey the information as well.--SarekOfVulcan (talk) 04:21, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:02, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:ST-TNG Clues.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Cburnett (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR:

• Keep All It's covered by fair use law.[17] The image is not decorative it helps to identify the episode, illustrate key plot points, and provides visual reference to the episodes thematic elements, and style. After all this is a visual medium and a picture is worth a thousands words as they say. I believe that the Star Trek episode pages could use more illustrations across the board. I also don't believe that one user should arbitrarily mass submit images for deletion. The use of images to illustrate a TV episode is very common site wide and generally held as acceptable and legal. --Mccordscvs (talk) 12:50, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep all and stop mass nominating things. You understand the episode more seeing the image from it. Dream Focus 01:29, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per Richwales (see File:STMatterofHonor.jpg. As stated by others below, these images are illustrative of the episodes and increase understanding, so their use seems appropriate. Such images are so widely used in episode articles that the wider community seems to support their use, so wider community discussion as proposed by Richwales seems necessary. --AussieLegend (✉) 16:00, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Clear failure of
  WP:NFCC#8. None of the keep arguments indicate what significant increase in understanding this image generates or what detrimental effects would occur from its omission.—Kww(talk) 01:03, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete - does not significantly add to understanding of episode, and omission would not be detrimental to understanding of episode. Impossible to tell that Picard is looking at the unexpected growth of the samples at the resolution/timestamp chosen.--SarekOfVulcan (talk) 04:22, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Monty845 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:40, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:ST-TNG Code of Honor.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Sage Veritas (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR:

• Keep All It's covered by fair use law.[18] The image is not decorative it helps to identify the episode, illustrate key plot points, and provides visual reference to the episodes thematic elements, and style. After all this is a visual medium and a picture is worth a thousands words as they say. I believe that the Star Trek episode pages could use more illustrations across the board. I also don't believe that one user should arbitrarily mass submit images for deletion. The use of images to illustrate a TV episode is very common site wide and generally held as acceptable and legal. --Mccordscvs (talk) 12:50, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep all and stop mass nominating things. You understand the episode more seeing the image from it. Dream Focus 01:29, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per Richwales (see File:STMatterofHonor.jpg. As stated by others below, these images are illustrative of the episodes and increase understanding, so their use seems appropriate. Such images are so widely used in episode articles that the wider community seems to support their use, so wider community discussion as proposed by Richwales seems necessary. --AussieLegend (✉) 16:00, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep The image helps the reader understand the topics and themes discussed in the text. Miyagawa (talk) 18:20, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Clear failure of
  WP:NFCC#8. None of the keep arguments indicate what significant increase in understanding this image generates or what detrimental effects would occur from its omission. Miyagawa's comment borders on the the absurd: what about an image of a woman dressed in gold tinfoil makes the reader understand the themes of this episode.—Kww(talk) 01:06, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Keep - omission would detract from understanding of episode. "Two women fight with spiky gloves" doesn't quite get the point across. --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 04:24, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Neither does a picture of them. The image doesn't create any level of understanding and is completely undiscussed.—Kww(talk) 05:30, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Undecided. The article extensively discusses that the cast were African-Americans, and that the theme was "1940s Africa", and this material is discussed throughout. The only question is, does this particular screenshot depict this aspect of production and criticism? I honestly can't tell. – Quadell ^(talk) 12:30, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  But there isn't any prose in the article that explicitly mentions any particular aspect, scene, costume, or anything as to what constitutes the allusions to "1940s Africa". If there were an image needed to illustrate what they were doing, which scenes are their homages and which scenes are straight-up science-fiction invention? — fourthords | =Λ= | 12:39, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Note to Keep voters: If you feel a screenshot passes
  WP:NFCC#8, it will not help to complain about mass nominations or defend the legality of the image use, since these are not relevant. Instead, if you could identify which specific sections of prose in the body of the article are depicted by the screenshot, it will help make the closing admin's job much easier. – Quadell ^(talk) 12:30, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete as not being necessary to understand any particular prose in the article (
  WP:NFCC#1) — fourthords | =Λ= | 12:39, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete (changed from undecided). I'm sure that a different screenshot could pass or non-free content policy, but I just don't see this one doing so. It the months that this has been in limbo, the article has not been improved to better justify this image. – Quadell ^(talk) 18:08, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:02, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cogenitor (ENT episode).jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by とある白い猫 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR:

• Keep All It's covered by fair use law.[19] The image is not decorative it helps to identify the episode, illustrate key plot points, and provides visual reference to the episodes thematic elements, and style. After all this is a visual medium and a picture is worth a thousands words as they say. I believe that the Star Trek episode pages could use more illustrations across the board. I also don't believe that one user should arbitrarily mass submit images for deletion. The use of images to illustrate a TV episode is very common site wide and generally held as acceptable and legal. --Mccordscvs (talk) 12:50, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep all and stop mass nominating things. You understand the episode more seeing the image from it. Dream Focus 01:29, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per Richwales (see File:STMatterofHonor.jpg. As stated by others below, these images are illustrative of the episodes and increase understanding, so their use seems appropriate. Such images are so widely used in episode articles that the wider community seems to support their use, so wider community discussion as proposed by Richwales seems necessary. --AussieLegend (✉) 16:00, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Clear failure of
  WP:NFCC#8. None of the keep arguments indicate what significant increase in understanding this image generates or what detrimental effects would occur from its omission.—Kww(talk) 01:06, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:02, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cold Station 12 (ENT episode).jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by とある白い猫 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR:

• Keep All It's covered by fair use law.[20] The image is not decorative it helps to identify the episode, illustrate key plot points, and provides visual reference to the episodes thematic elements, and style. After all this is a visual medium and a picture is worth a thousands words as they say. I believe that the Star Trek episode pages could use more illustrations across the board. I also don't believe that one user should arbitrarily mass submit images for deletion. The use of images to illustrate a TV episode is very common site wide and generally held as acceptable and legal. --Mccordscvs (talk) 12:50, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep all and stop mass nominating things. You understand the episode more seeing the image from it. Dream Focus 01:29, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per Richwales (see File:STMatterofHonor.jpg. As stated by others below, these images are illustrative of the episodes and increase understanding, so their use seems appropriate. Such images are so widely used in episode articles that the wider community seems to support their use, so wider community discussion as proposed by Richwales seems necessary. --AussieLegend (✉) 16:00, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Clear failure of
  WP:NFCC#8. None of the keep arguments indicate what significant increase in understanding this image generates or what detrimental effects would occur from its omission.—Kww(talk) 01:07, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete: Just a shot of Brent Spiner pointing. We already have those from the same period for free use (well, he's not pointing, but we can all picture him pointing!). Miyagawa (talk) 17:37, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:02, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:STContagion.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Cyberia23 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR:

• Keep All It's covered by fair use law.[21] The image is not decorative it helps to identify the episode, illustrate key plot points, and provides visual reference to the episodes thematic elements, and style. After all this is a visual medium and a picture is worth a thousands words as they say. I believe that the Star Trek episode pages could use more illustrations across the board. I also don't believe that one user should arbitrarily mass submit images for deletion. The use of images to illustrate a TV episode is very common site wide and generally held as acceptable and legal. --Mccordscvs (talk) 12:50, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep all and stop mass nominating things. You understand the episode more seeing the image from it. Dream Focus 01:29, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per Richwales (see File:STMatterofHonor.jpg. As stated by others below, these images are illustrative of the episodes and increase understanding, so their use seems appropriate. Such images are so widely used in episode articles that the wider community seems to support their use, so wider community discussion as proposed by Richwales seems necessary. --AussieLegend (✉) 16:00, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Clear failure of
  WP:NFCC#8. None of the keep arguments indicate what significant increase in understanding this image generates or what detrimental effects would occur from its omission.—Kww(talk) 01:07, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete - does not significantly add to understanding of episode, and omission would not be detrimental to understanding of episode. "Romulan warbird hangs menacingly in front of the Enterprise" would convey pretty much the same information. OTOH, a similar shot from "The Neutral Zone" might pass, as it was our first view of the new ships. --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 04:27, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:02, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:ST-TNG Conundrum.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by RoyBoy (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR:

• Keep All It's covered by fair use law.[22] The image is not decorative it helps to identify the episode, illustrate key plot points, and provides visual reference to the episodes thematic elements, and style. After all this is a visual medium and a picture is worth a thousands words as they say. I believe that the Star Trek episode pages could use more illustrations across the board. I also don't believe that one user should arbitrarily mass submit images for deletion. The use of images to illustrate a TV episode is very common site wide and generally held as acceptable and legal. --Mccordscvs (talk) 12:50, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep all and stop mass nominating things. You understand the episode more seeing the image from it. Dream Focus 01:29, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per Richwales (see File:STMatterofHonor.jpg. As stated by others below, these images are illustrative of the episodes and increase understanding, so their use seems appropriate. Such images are so widely used in episode articles that the wider community seems to support their use, so wider community discussion as proposed by Richwales seems necessary. --AussieLegend (✉) 16:00, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Clear failure of
  WP:NFCC#8. None of the keep arguments indicate what significant increase in understanding this image generates or what detrimental effects would occur from its omission.—Kww(talk) 01:07, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Keep: It makes the episode(s) far easier to identify for someone who has seen it, but cannot remember the name. These images are selected to be unique to the episode and illustrate a relevant aspect of the story -- in this case, a new character. It is television, a visual medium, and one frame to ID the episode isn't unreasonable. If the copyright holder disagrees, then Wikipedia will comply. - RoyBoy 15:38, 25 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - does not significantly add to understanding of episode, and omission would not be detrimental to understanding of episode. --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 04:28, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep – Quadell ^(talk) 13:29, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:RemmicksParasite.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Sage Veritas (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR:

• Keep All It's covered by fair use law.[23] The image is not decorative it helps to identify the episode, illustrate key plot points, and provides visual reference to the episodes thematic elements, and style. After all this is a visual medium and a picture is worth a thousands words as they say. I believe that the Star Trek episode pages could use more illustrations across the board. I also don't believe that one user should arbitrarily mass submit images for deletion. The use of images to illustrate a TV episode is very common site wide and generally held as acceptable and legal. --Mccordscvs (talk) 12:50, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep all and stop mass nominating things. You understand the episode more seeing the image from it. Dream Focus 01:29, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep This alien entity is controlling the Admirals at Starfleet Central and is the basis of the episode. --Leoboudv (talk) 01:46, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per Richwales (see File:STMatterofHonor.jpg. As stated by others below, these images are illustrative of the episodes and increase understanding, so their use seems appropriate. Such images are so widely used in episode articles that the wider community seems to support their use, so wider community discussion as proposed by Richwales seems necessary. --AussieLegend (✉) 16:00, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep The design of the parasite is discussed in the text of the article itself. Miyagawa (talk) 18:22, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep This one actually is useful to explain why the episode faced censorship issues.—Kww(talk) 01:09, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per Miyagawa's and Kww's arguments. --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 04:29, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep, the content of the screenshot is clearly discussed in the "Plot", "Production", and "Reception" sections. – Quadell ^(talk) 12:37, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:02, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:ST-TNG Cost of Living.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Cburnett (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR:

• Keep All It's covered by fair use law.[24] The image is not decorative it helps to identify the episode, illustrate key plot points, and provides visual reference to the episodes thematic elements, and style. After all this is a visual medium and a picture is worth a thousands words as they say. I believe that the Star Trek episode pages could use more illustrations across the board. I also don't believe that one user should arbitrarily mass submit images for deletion. The use of images to illustrate a TV episode is very common site wide and generally held as acceptable and legal. --Mccordscvs (talk) 12:50, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep all and stop mass nominating things. You understand the episode more seeing the image from it. Dream Focus 01:29, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per Richwales (see File:STMatterofHonor.jpg. As stated by others below, these images are illustrative of the episodes and increase understanding, so their use seems appropriate. Such images are so widely used in episode articles that the wider community seems to support their use, so wider community discussion as proposed by Richwales seems necessary. --AussieLegend (✉) 16:00, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Clear failure of
  WP:NFCC#8. None of the keep arguments indicate what significant increase in understanding this image generates or what detrimental effects would occur from its omission.—Kww(talk) 01:09, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:02, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Countdown (ENT episode).jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by とある白い猫 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR:

• Keep All It's covered by fair use law.[25] The image is not decorative it helps to identify the episode, illustrate key plot points, and provides visual reference to the episodes thematic elements, and style. After all this is a visual medium and a picture is worth a thousands words as they say. I believe that the Star Trek episode pages could use more illustrations across the board. I also don't believe that one user should arbitrarily mass submit images for deletion. The use of images to illustrate a TV episode is very common site wide and generally held as acceptable and legal. --Mccordscvs (talk) 12:50, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep all and stop mass nominating things. You understand the episode more seeing the image from it. Dream Focus 01:29, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per Richwales (see File:STMatterofHonor.jpg. As stated by others below, these images are illustrative of the episodes and increase understanding, so their use seems appropriate. Such images are so widely used in episode articles that the wider community seems to support their use, so wider community discussion as proposed by Richwales seems necessary. --AussieLegend (✉) 16:00, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Clear failure of
  WP:NFCC#8. None of the keep arguments indicate what significant increase in understanding this image generates or what detrimental effects would occur from its omission.—Kww(talk) 01:10, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:02, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:STCourtMartial.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Cyberia23 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR:

• Keep All It's covered by fair use law.[26] The image is not decorative it helps to identify the episode, illustrate key plot points, and provides visual reference to the episodes thematic elements, and style. After all this is a visual medium and a picture is worth a thousands words as they say. I believe that the Star Trek episode pages could use more illustrations across the board. I also don't believe that one user should arbitrarily mass submit images for deletion. The use of images to illustrate a TV episode is very common site wide and generally held as acceptable and legal. --Mccordscvs (talk) 12:50, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep all and stop mass nominating things. You understand the episode more seeing the image from it. Dream Focus 01:29, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per Richwales (see File:STMatterofHonor.jpg. As stated by others below, these images are illustrative of the episodes and increase understanding, so their use seems appropriate. Such images are so widely used in episode articles that the wider community seems to support their use, so wider community discussion as proposed by Richwales seems necessary. --AussieLegend (✉) 16:00, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Clear failure of
  WP:NFCC#8. None of the keep arguments indicate what significant increase in understanding this image generates or what detrimental effects would occur from its omission.—Kww(talk) 01:10, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Keep - arrangement is distinctive enough that removal might adversely affect understanding. --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 04:32, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:02, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:STDaggerMind.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Cyberia23 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR:

• Keep All It's covered by fair use law.[27] The image is not decorative it helps to identify the episode, illustrate key plot points, and provides visual reference to the episodes thematic elements, and style. After all this is a visual medium and a picture is worth a thousands words as they say. I believe that the Star Trek episode pages could use more illustrations across the board. I also don't believe that one user should arbitrarily mass submit images for deletion. The use of images to illustrate a TV episode is very common site wide and generally held as acceptable and legal. --Mccordscvs (talk) 12:50, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep all and stop mass nominating things. You understand the episode more seeing the image from it. Dream Focus 01:29, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per Richwales (see File:STMatterofHonor.jpg. As stated by others below, these images are illustrative of the episodes and increase understanding, so their use seems appropriate. Such images are so widely used in episode articles that the wider community seems to support their use, so wider community discussion as proposed by Richwales seems necessary. --AussieLegend (✉) 16:00, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Clear failure of
  WP:NFCC#8. None of the keep arguments indicate what significant increase in understanding this image generates or what detrimental effects would occur from its omission.—Kww(talk) 01:11, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete - does not significantly add to understanding of episode, and omission would not be detrimental to understanding of episode. "Kirk writhes in pain on a chair" conveys pretty much the same information. --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 04:33, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:02, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Damage (ENT episode).jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by とある白い猫 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR:

• Keep All It's covered by fair use law.[28] The image is not decorative it helps to identify the episode, illustrate key plot points, and provides visual reference to the episodes thematic elements, and style. After all this is a visual medium and a picture is worth a thousands words as they say. I believe that the Star Trek episode pages could use more illustrations across the board. I also don't believe that one user should arbitrarily mass submit images for deletion. The use of images to illustrate a TV episode is very common site wide and generally held as acceptable and legal. --Mccordscvs (talk) 12:50, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep all and stop mass nominating things. You understand the episode more seeing the image from it. Dream Focus 01:29, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per Richwales (see File:STMatterofHonor.jpg. As stated by others below, these images are illustrative of the episodes and increase understanding, so their use seems appropriate. Such images are so widely used in episode articles that the wider community seems to support their use, so wider community discussion as proposed by Richwales seems necessary. --AussieLegend (✉) 16:00, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Clear failure of
  WP:NFCC#8. None of the keep arguments indicate what significant increase in understanding this image generates or what detrimental effects would occur from its omission.—Kww(talk) 01:11, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:02, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:ST-TNG Dark Page.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Cburnett (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR:

• Keep All It's covered by fair use law.[29] The image is not decorative it helps to identify the episode, illustrate key plot points, and provides visual reference to the episodes thematic elements, and style. After all this is a visual medium and a picture is worth a thousands words as they say. I believe that the Star Trek episode pages could use more illustrations across the board. I also don't believe that one user should arbitrarily mass submit images for deletion. The use of images to illustrate a TV episode is very common site wide and generally held as acceptable and legal. --Mccordscvs (talk) 12:50, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep all and stop mass nominating things. You understand the episode more seeing the image from it. Dream Focus 01:29, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per Richwales (see File:STMatterofHonor.jpg. As stated by others below, these images are illustrative of the episodes and increase understanding, so their use seems appropriate. Such images are so widely used in episode articles that the wider community seems to support their use, so wider community discussion as proposed by Richwales seems necessary. --AussieLegend (✉) 16:00, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Clear failure of
  WP:NFCC#8. None of the keep arguments indicate what significant increase in understanding this image generates or what detrimental effects would occur from its omission.—Kww(talk) 01:12, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete - does not significantly add to understanding of episode, and omission would not be detrimental to understanding of episode. "Troi sits up alarmed in sickbay next to her mother" conveys pretty much the same information.--SarekOfVulcan (talk) 04:34, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:02, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:ST-TNG Data's Day.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Cburnett (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR:

• Keep All It's covered by fair use law.[30] The image is not decorative it helps to identify the episode, illustrate key plot points, and provides visual reference to the episodes thematic elements, and style. After all this is a visual medium and a picture is worth a thousands words as they say. I believe that the Star Trek episode pages could use more illustrations across the board. I also don't believe that one user should arbitrarily mass submit images for deletion. The use of images to illustrate a TV episode is very common site wide and generally held as acceptable and legal. --Mccordscvs (talk) 12:50, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep all and stop mass nominating things. You understand the episode more seeing the image from it. Dream Focus 01:29, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per Richwales (see File:STMatterofHonor.jpg. As stated by others below, these images are illustrative of the episodes and increase understanding, so their use seems appropriate. Such images are so widely used in episode articles that the wider community seems to support their use, so wider community discussion as proposed by Richwales seems necessary. --AussieLegend (✉) 16:00, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Clear failure of
  WP:NFCC#8. None of the keep arguments indicate what significant increase in understanding this image generates or what detrimental effects would occur from its omission.—Kww(talk) 01:12, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete - does not significantly add to understanding of episode, and omission would not be detrimental to understanding of episode. "Data and Crusher tap-dance side by side" gets the point across.--SarekOfVulcan (talk) 04:35, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:02, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:ENTdawn.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by (aeropagitica) (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR:

• Keep All It's covered by fair use law.[31] The image is not decorative it helps to identify the episode, illustrate key plot points, and provides visual reference to the episodes thematic elements, and style. After all this is a visual medium and a picture is worth a thousands words as they say. I believe that the Star Trek episode pages could use more illustrations across the board. I also don't believe that one user should arbitrarily mass submit images for deletion. The use of images to illustrate a TV episode is very common site wide and generally held as acceptable and legal. --Mccordscvs (talk) 12:50, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep all and stop mass nominating things. You understand the episode more seeing the image from it. Dream Focus 01:29, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per Richwales (see File:STMatterofHonor.jpg. As stated by others below, these images are illustrative of the episodes and increase understanding, so their use seems appropriate. Such images are so widely used in episode articles that the wider community seems to support their use, so wider community discussion as proposed by Richwales seems necessary. --AussieLegend (✉) 16:00, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Clear failure of
  WP:NFCC#8. None of the keep arguments indicate what significant increase in understanding this image generates or what detrimental effects would occur from its omission.—Kww(talk) 01:13, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:02, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:STDayofDove.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Cyberia23 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR:

• Keep All It's covered by fair use law.[32] The image is not decorative it helps to identify the episode, illustrate key plot points, and provides visual reference to the episodes thematic elements, and style. After all this is a visual medium and a picture is worth a thousands words as they say. I believe that the Star Trek episode pages could use more illustrations across the board. I also don't believe that one user should arbitrarily mass submit images for deletion. The use of images to illustrate a TV episode is very common site wide and generally held as acceptable and legal. --Mccordscvs (talk) 12:50, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep all and stop mass nominating things. You understand the episode more seeing the image from it. Dream Focus 01:29, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per Richwales (see File:STMatterofHonor.jpg. As stated by others below, these images are illustrative of the episodes and increase understanding, so their use seems appropriate. Such images are so widely used in episode articles that the wider community seems to support their use, so wider community discussion as proposed by Richwales seems necessary. --AussieLegend (✉) 16:00, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Clear failure of
  WP:NFCC#8. None of the keep arguments indicate what significant increase in understanding this image generates or what detrimental effects would occur from its omission.—Kww(talk) 01:13, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Keep This episode presents the Klingons slightly differently from earlier ones, so having the picture is useful in this case. Besides, doesn't Worf use that exact sash in early episodes of TNG? --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 04:38, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• That isn't mentioned in the article, so the image isn't supporting critical discussion. Even if it was, how would a change in Klingon appearance be important to understanding this episode? Your "keep" argument does nothing to undermine the deletion nomination.—Kww(talk) 04:42, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:02, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Enterprise - S2E04 - Dead Stop.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Snorbaard (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR:

• Keep All It's covered by fair use law.[33] The image is not decorative it helps to identify the episode, illustrate key plot points, and provides visual reference to the episodes thematic elements, and style. After all this is a visual medium and a picture is worth a thousands words as they say. I believe that the Star Trek episode pages could use more illustrations across the board. I also don't believe that one user should arbitrarily mass submit images for deletion. The use of images to illustrate a TV episode is very common site wide and generally held as acceptable and legal. --Mccordscvs (talk) 12:50, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep all and stop mass nominating things. You understand the episode more seeing the image from it. Dream Focus 01:29, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per Richwales (see File:STMatterofHonor.jpg. As stated by others below, these images are illustrative of the episodes and increase understanding, so their use seems appropriate. Such images are so widely used in episode articles that the wider community seems to support their use, so wider community discussion as proposed by Richwales seems necessary. --AussieLegend (✉) 16:00, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Clear failure of
  WP:NFCC#8. None of the keep arguments indicate what significant increase in understanding this image generates or what detrimental effects would occur from its omission.—Kww(talk) 01:14, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:02, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:STDejaQ.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Cyberia23 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR:

• Keep All It's covered by fair use law.[34] The image is not decorative it helps to identify the episode, illustrate key plot points, and provides visual reference to the episodes thematic elements, and style. After all this is a visual medium and a picture is worth a thousands words as they say. I believe that the Star Trek episode pages could use more illustrations across the board. I also don't believe that one user should arbitrarily mass submit images for deletion. The use of images to illustrate a TV episode is very common site wide and generally held as acceptable and legal. --Mccordscvs (talk) 12:50, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep all and stop mass nominating things. You understand the episode more seeing the image from it. Dream Focus 01:29, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per Richwales (see File:STMatterofHonor.jpg. As stated by others below, these images are illustrative of the episodes and increase understanding, so their use seems appropriate. Such images are so widely used in episode articles that the wider community seems to support their use, so wider community discussion as proposed by Richwales seems necessary. --AussieLegend (✉) 16:00, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Clear failure of
  WP:NFCC#8. None of the keep arguments indicate what significant increase in understanding this image generates or what detrimental effects would occur from its omission.—Kww(talk) 01:15, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete - does not significantly add to understanding of episode, and omission would not be detrimental to understanding of episode. "Data talks to depressed-looking Q" conveys pretty much the same information. --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 04:40, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 09:07, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Divergence (ENT episode).jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by とある白い猫 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR:

• Keep All It's covered by fair use law.[35] The image is not decorative it helps to identify the episode, illustrate key plot points, and provides visual reference to the episodes thematic elements, and style. After all this is a visual medium and a picture is worth a thousands words as they say. I believe that the Star Trek episode pages could use more illustrations across the board. I also don't believe that one user should arbitrarily mass submit images for deletion. The use of images to illustrate a TV episode is very common site wide and generally held as acceptable and legal. --Mccordscvs (talk) 12:50, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep all and stop mass nominating things. You understand the episode more seeing the image from it. Dream Focus 01:29, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per Richwales (see File:STMatterofHonor.jpg. As stated by others below, these images are illustrative of the episodes and increase understanding, so their use seems appropriate. Such images are so widely used in episode articles that the wider community seems to support their use, so wider community discussion as proposed by Richwales seems necessary. --AussieLegend (✉) 16:00, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Clear failure of
  WP:NFCC#8. None of the keep arguments indicate what significant increase in understanding this image generates or what detrimental effects would occur from its omission.—Kww(talk) 01:15, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 09:07, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Doctor's Orders (ENT episode).jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by とある白い猫 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR:

• Keep All It's covered by fair use law.[36] The image is not decorative it helps to identify the episode, illustrate key plot points, and provides visual reference to the episodes thematic elements, and style. After all this is a visual medium and a picture is worth a thousands words as they say. I believe that the Star Trek episode pages could use more illustrations across the board. I also don't believe that one user should arbitrarily mass submit images for deletion. The use of images to illustrate a TV episode is very common site wide and generally held as acceptable and legal. --Mccordscvs (talk) 12:50, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep all and stop mass nominating things. You understand the episode more seeing the image from it. Dream Focus 01:29, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per Richwales (see File:STMatterofHonor.jpg. As stated by others below, these images are illustrative of the episodes and increase understanding, so their use seems appropriate. Such images are so widely used in episode articles that the wider community seems to support their use, so wider community discussion as proposed by Richwales seems necessary. --AussieLegend (✉) 16:00, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Actually this one is pretty rubbish, it's just a shot of two of the main cast, one of them looking disorientated. If I was expanding the article, I'd delete the image anyway as I can't imagine what could be included in the text that this image would help the reader understand better. Miyagawa (talk) 18:24, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Clear failure of
  WP:NFCC#8. None of the keep arguments indicate what significant increase in understanding this image generates or what detrimental effects would occur from its omission.—Kww(talk) 01:16, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 09:07, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:STElaan.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Cyberia23 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR:

• Keep All It's covered by fair use law.[37] The image is not decorative it helps to identify the episode, illustrate key plot points, and provides visual reference to the episodes thematic elements, and style. After all this is a visual medium and a picture is worth a thousands words as they say. I believe that the Star Trek episode pages could use more illustrations across the board. I also don't believe that one user should arbitrarily mass submit images for deletion. The use of images to illustrate a TV episode is very common site wide and generally held as acceptable and legal. --Mccordscvs (talk) 12:50, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep all and stop mass nominating things. You understand the episode more seeing the image from it. Dream Focus 01:29, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per Richwales (see File:STMatterofHonor.jpg. As stated by others below, these images are illustrative of the episodes and increase understanding, so their use seems appropriate. Such images are so widely used in episode articles that the wider community seems to support their use, so wider community discussion as proposed by Richwales seems necessary. --AussieLegend (✉) 16:00, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Clear failure of
  WP:NFCC#8. None of the keep arguments indicate what significant increase in understanding this image generates or what detrimental effects would occur from its omission.—Kww(talk) 01:17, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete - does not significantly add to understanding of episode, and omission would not be detrimental to understanding of episode. --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 04:41, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 09:07, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:ST TNG Devil's Due.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by とある白い猫 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR:

• Keep All It's covered by fair use law.[38] The image is not decorative it helps to identify the episode, illustrate key plot points, and provides visual reference to the episodes thematic elements, and style. After all this is a visual medium and a picture is worth a thousands words as they say. I believe that the Star Trek episode pages could use more illustrations across the board. I also don't believe that one user should arbitrarily mass submit images for deletion. The use of images to illustrate a TV episode is very common site wide and generally held as acceptable and legal. --Mccordscvs (talk) 12:50, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep all and stop mass nominating things. You understand the episode more seeing the image from it. Dream Focus 01:29, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per Richwales (see File:STMatterofHonor.jpg. As stated by others below, these images are illustrative of the episodes and increase understanding, so their use seems appropriate. Such images are so widely used in episode articles that the wider community seems to support their use, so wider community discussion as proposed by Richwales seems necessary. --AussieLegend (✉) 16:00, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep The makeup is described in the text of the article, and so this image helps the reader understand what that is referring to. Miyagawa (talk) 18:25, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Clear failure of
  WP:NFCC#8 is about.—Kww(talk) 01:19, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 09:07, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:ST-TNG Elementary, Dear Data.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Cburnett (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR:

• Keep All It's covered by fair use law.[39] The image is not decorative it helps to identify the episode, illustrate key plot points, and provides visual reference to the episodes thematic elements, and style. After all this is a visual medium and a picture is worth a thousands words as they say. I believe that the Star Trek episode pages could use more illustrations across the board. I also don't believe that one user should arbitrarily mass submit images for deletion. The use of images to illustrate a TV episode is very common site wide and generally held as acceptable and legal. --Mccordscvs (talk) 12:50, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep all and stop mass nominating things. You understand the episode more seeing the image from it. Dream Focus 01:29, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per Richwales (see File:STMatterofHonor.jpg. As stated by others below, these images are illustrative of the episodes and increase understanding, so their use seems appropriate. Such images are so widely used in episode articles that the wider community seems to support their use, so wider community discussion as proposed by Richwales seems necessary. --AussieLegend (✉) 16:00, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Clear failure of
  WP:NFCC#8. None of the keep arguments indicate what significant increase in understanding this image generates or what detrimental effects would occur from its omission. "'Ooh, they tried to fake the streets of London as a cheesy plot device" can be expressed in text.—Kww(talk) 01:20, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete - does not significantly add to understanding of episode, and omission would not be detrimental to understanding of episode. "Moriarty gives instructions to the Arch, with 19th-century London in the background" gets the point across. (That said, it's a fairly striking image, so the delete is weaker than some of my others tonight.)--SarekOfVulcan (talk) 04:43, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 09:07, 20 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:ST-TNG Emergence.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Cburnett (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR:

• Keep All It's covered by fair use law.[40] The image is not decorative it helps to identify the episode, illustrate key plot points, and provides visual reference to the episodes thematic elements, and style. After all this is a visual medium and a picture is worth a thousands words as they say. I believe that the Star Trek episode pages could use more illustrations across the board. I also don't believe that one user should arbitrarily mass submit images for deletion. The use of images to illustrate a TV episode is very common site wide and generally held as acceptable and legal. --Mccordscvs (talk) 12:50, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep all and stop mass nominating things. You understand the episode more seeing the image from it. Dream Focus 01:29, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per Richwales (see File:STMatterofHonor.jpg. As stated by others below, these images are illustrative of the episodes and increase understanding, so their use seems appropriate. Such images are so widely used in episode articles that the wider community seems to support their use, so wider community discussion as proposed by Richwales seems necessary. --AussieLegend (✉) 16:00, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Clear failure of
  WP:NFCC#8. None of the keep arguments indicate what significant increase in understanding this image generates or what detrimental effects would occur from its omission.—Kww(talk) 01:21, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 17:09, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:ST-TNG Encounter at Farpoint.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Sage Veritas (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR:

• Keep All It's covered by fair use law.[41] The image is not decorative it helps to identify the episode, illustrate key plot points, and provides visual reference to the episodes thematic elements, and style. After all this is a visual medium and a picture is worth a thousands words as they say. I believe that the Star Trek episode pages could use more illustrations across the board. I also don't believe that one user should arbitrarily mass submit images for deletion. The use of images to illustrate a TV episode is very common site wide and generally held as acceptable and legal. --Mccordscvs (talk) 12:50, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep all and stop mass nominating things. You understand the episode more seeing the image from it. Dream Focus 01:29, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per Richwales (see File:STMatterofHonor.jpg. As stated by others below, these images are illustrative of the episodes and increase understanding, so their use seems appropriate. Such images are so widely used in episode articles that the wider community seems to support their use, so wider community discussion as proposed by Richwales seems necessary. --AussieLegend (✉) 16:00, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep An image including the design of the aliens would be required in order to help the reader understand what is included in the article text. Miyagawa (talk) 18:26, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Clear failure of
  WP:NFCC#8. None of the keep arguments indicate what significant increase in understanding this image generates or what detrimental effects would occur from its omission.—Kww(talk) 01:22, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Keep - "giant glowing space jellyfish" is far enough outside most people's experience that removing the image would be detrimental to understanding the episode. --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 04:45, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: The content of the screenshot is described in a single sentence in the "Plot" section, but is not really discussed elsewhere. (Discussing "new models of the Enterprise" in "Filming" really doesn't count.) There are many ways the content could be discussed in "reception" or "conception" or "home media", but it is not. – Quadell ^(talk) 12:44, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Note to Keep voters: If you feel a screenshot passes
  WP:NFCC#8, it will not help to complain about mass nominations or defend the legality of the image use, since these are not relevant. Instead, if you could identify which specific sections of prose in the body of the article are depicted by the screenshot, it will help make the closing admin's job much easier. – Quadell ^(talk) 12:44, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete: If the image were vitally important to understanding the plot (
  WP:NFCC#8)—the only place the subject is discussed—it would be alongside that text for such facilitation. Furthermore, how many aliens does Star Trek feature; do we need photos of very single one to understand stories where their appearance isn't instrumental to the plot? Right now, I feel it's purpose is instead to decorate an infobox where nothing needs its illustrative properties. — fourthords | =Λ= | 12:50, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 09:07, 20 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:ST-TNG Ensign Ro.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Cburnett (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR:

• Keep All It's covered by fair use law.[42] The image is not decorative it helps to identify the episode, illustrate key plot points, and provides visual reference to the episodes thematic elements, and style. After all this is a visual medium and a picture is worth a thousands words as they say. I believe that the Star Trek episode pages could use more illustrations across the board. I also don't believe that one user should arbitrarily mass submit images for deletion. The use of images to illustrate a TV episode is very common site wide and generally held as acceptable and legal. --Mccordscvs (talk) 12:50, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep all and stop mass nominating things. You understand the episode more seeing the image from it. Dream Focus 01:29, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per Richwales (see File:STMatterofHonor.jpg. As stated by others below, these images are illustrative of the episodes and increase understanding, so their use seems appropriate. Such images are so widely used in episode articles that the wider community seems to support their use, so wider community discussion as proposed by Richwales seems necessary. --AussieLegend (✉) 16:00, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Unlikely to add anything to the article. Although this episode is the first appearance of the Bajorans, potentially a more important image would be a shot of Michelle Forbes' face in order to show the makeup which could potentially be described in an expanded article. Miyagawa (talk) 18:27, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Clear failure of
  WP:NFCC#8. None of the keep arguments indicate what significant increase in understanding this image generates or what detrimental effects would occur from its omission.—Kww(talk) 01:23, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete - does not significantly add to understanding of episode, and omission would not be detrimental to understanding of episode. --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 04:46, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 09:07, 20 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:STErrandofMercy.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Cyberia23 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR:

• Keep All It's covered by fair use law.[43] The image is not decorative it helps to identify the episode, illustrate key plot points, and provides visual reference to the episodes thematic elements, and style. After all this is a visual medium and a picture is worth a thousands words as they say. I believe that the Star Trek episode pages could use more illustrations across the board. I also don't believe that one user should arbitrarily mass submit images for deletion. The use of images to illustrate a TV episode is very common site wide and generally held as acceptable and legal. --Mccordscvs (talk) 12:50, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep all and stop mass nominating things. You understand the episode more seeing the image from it. Dream Focus 01:29, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per Richwales (see File:STMatterofHonor.jpg. As stated by others below, these images are illustrative of the episodes and increase understanding, so their use seems appropriate. Such images are so widely used in episode articles that the wider community seems to support their use, so wider community discussion as proposed by Richwales seems necessary. --AussieLegend (✉) 16:00, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Clear failure of
  WP:NFCC#8. None of the keep arguments indicate what significant increase in understanding this image generates or what detrimental effects would occur from its omission.—Kww(talk) 01:23, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete - does not significantly add to understanding of episode, and omission would not be detrimental to understanding of episode. Screenshot of the g'day't glowbugs would come closer to pass NFCC8, otoh.--SarekOfVulcan (talk) 05:00, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 09:07, 20 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:ST-TNG Family.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Cburnett (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR:

• Keep All It's covered by fair use law.[44] The image is not decorative it helps to identify the episode, illustrate key plot points, and provides visual reference to the episodes thematic elements, and style. After all this is a visual medium and a picture is worth a thousands words as they say. I believe that the Star Trek episode pages could use more illustrations across the board. I also don't believe that one user should arbitrarily mass submit images for deletion. The use of images to illustrate a TV episode is very common site wide and generally held as acceptable and legal. --Mccordscvs (talk) 12:50, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep all and stop mass nominating things. You understand the episode more seeing the image from it. Dream Focus 01:29, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per Richwales (see File:STMatterofHonor.jpg. As stated by others below, these images are illustrative of the episodes and increase understanding, so their use seems appropriate. Such images are so widely used in episode articles that the wider community seems to support their use, so wider community discussion as proposed by Richwales seems necessary. --AussieLegend (✉) 16:00, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Unlikely to add anything to the article other than illustration. I can't see how it aids the understanding of the reader more than text alone would. Miyagawa (talk) 18:29, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Clear failure of
  WP:NFCC#8. None of the keep arguments indicate what significant increase in understanding this image generates or what detrimental effects would occur from its omission.—Kww(talk) 01:23, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 09:07, 20 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:ST-TNG Ethics.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Cburnett (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR:

• Keep All It's covered by fair use law.[45] The image is not decorative it helps to identify the episode, illustrate key plot points, and provides visual reference to the episodes thematic elements, and style. After all this is a visual medium and a picture is worth a thousands words as they say. I believe that the Star Trek episode pages could use more illustrations across the board. I also don't believe that one user should arbitrarily mass submit images for deletion. The use of images to illustrate a TV episode is very common site wide and generally held as acceptable and legal. --Mccordscvs (talk) 12:50, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep all and stop mass nominating things. You understand the episode more seeing the image from it. Dream Focus 01:29, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per Richwales (see File:STMatterofHonor.jpg. As stated by others below, these images are illustrative of the episodes and increase understanding, so their use seems appropriate. Such images are so widely used in episode articles that the wider community seems to support their use, so wider community discussion as proposed by Richwales seems necessary. --AussieLegend (✉) 16:00, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete A more important image would be a shot of the Klingon spine prop, for which there is coverage of its creation for this episode in the Star Trek Makeup book by Michael Westmore. Miyagawa (talk) 18:30, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Clear failure of
  WP:NFCC#8. None of the keep arguments indicate what significant increase in understanding this image generates or what detrimental effects would occur from its omission.—Kww(talk) 01:24, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 09:07, 20 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:ST-TNG Evolution.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Cburnett (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR:

• Keep All It's covered by fair use law.[46] The image is not decorative it helps to identify the episode, illustrate key plot points, and provides visual reference to the episodes thematic elements, and style. After all this is a visual medium and a picture is worth a thousands words as they say. I believe that the Star Trek episode pages could use more illustrations across the board. I also don't believe that one user should arbitrarily mass submit images for deletion. The use of images to illustrate a TV episode is very common site wide and generally held as acceptable and legal. --Mccordscvs (talk) 12:50, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep all and stop mass nominating things. You understand the episode more seeing the image from it. Dream Focus 01:29, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per Richwales (see File:STMatterofHonor.jpg. As stated by others below, these images are illustrative of the episodes and increase understanding, so their use seems appropriate. Such images are so widely used in episode articles that the wider community seems to support their use, so wider community discussion as proposed by Richwales seems necessary. --AussieLegend (✉) 16:00, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete "The Enterprise flies past a glowing red ball" would be enough. Clear failure of
  WP:NFCC#8. None of the keep arguments indicate what significant increase in understanding this image generates or what detrimental effects would occur from its omission.—Kww(talk) 21:05, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 09:07, 20 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:ST-TNG Eye of the Beholder.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Cburnett (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR:

• Keep All It's covered by fair use law.[47] The image is not decorative it helps to identify the episode, illustrate key plot points, and provides visual reference to the episodes thematic elements, and style. After all this is a visual medium and a picture is worth a thousands words as they say. I believe that the Star Trek episode pages could use more illustrations across the board. I also don't believe that one user should arbitrarily mass submit images for deletion. The use of images to illustrate a TV episode is very common site wide and generally held as acceptable and legal. --Mccordscvs (talk) 12:50, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep all and stop mass nominating things. You understand the episode more seeing the image from it. Dream Focus 01:29, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per Richwales (see File:STMatterofHonor.jpg. As stated by others below, these images are illustrative of the episodes and increase understanding, so their use seems appropriate. Such images are so widely used in episode articles that the wider community seems to support their use, so wider community discussion as proposed by Richwales seems necessary. --AussieLegend (✉) 16:00, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete "Man leaps into column of glitter" is an adequate replacement. Clear failure of
  WP:NFCC#8. None of the keep arguments indicate what significant increase in understanding this image generates or what detrimental effects would occur from its omission. There's no article here, either: it's an abuse of fair-use material to include it because no Wikipedia editor had the intiative to actually write anything about the topic.—Kww(talk) 21:07, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 09:07, 20 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:ST-VOY 6 11.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Thealok (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR:

• Keep All It's covered by fair use law.[48] The image is not decorative it helps to identify the episode, illustrate key plot points, and provides visual reference to the episodes thematic elements, and style. After all this is a visual medium and a picture is worth a thousands words as they say. I believe that the Star Trek episode pages could use more illustrations across the board. I also don't believe that one user should arbitrarily mass submit images for deletion. The use of images to illustrate a TV episode is very common site wide and generally held as acceptable and legal. --Mccordscvs (talk) 12:50, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep all and stop mass nominating things. You understand the episode more seeing the image from it. Dream Focus 01:29, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per Richwales (see File:STMatterofHonor.jpg. As stated by others below, these images are illustrative of the episodes and increase understanding, so their use seems appropriate. Such images are so widely used in episode articles that the wider community seems to support their use, so wider community discussion as proposed by Richwales seems necessary. --AussieLegend (✉) 16:00, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete "Two men in hats discuss something offscreen, and we aren't going to tell you what it is". Clear failure of
  WP:NFCC#8. None of the keep arguments indicate what significant increase in understanding this image generates or what detrimental effects would occur from its omission.—Kww(talk) 21:10, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 09:07, 20 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:ST-TNG First Contact.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Cburnett (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR:

• Keep All It's covered by fair use law.[49] The image is not decorative it helps to identify the episode, illustrate key plot points, and provides visual reference to the episodes thematic elements, and style. After all this is a visual medium and a picture is worth a thousands words as they say. I believe that the Star Trek episode pages could use more illustrations across the board. I also don't believe that one user should arbitrarily mass submit images for deletion. The use of images to illustrate a TV episode is very common site wide and generally held as acceptable and legal. --Mccordscvs (talk) 12:50, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep all and stop mass nominating things. You understand the episode more seeing the image from it. Dream Focus 01:29, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per Richwales (see File:STMatterofHonor.jpg. As stated by others below, these images are illustrative of the episodes and increase understanding, so their use seems appropriate. Such images are so widely used in episode articles that the wider community seems to support their use, so wider community discussion as proposed by Richwales seems necessary. --AussieLegend (✉) 16:00, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: "Riker got beaten badly" would suffice. Clear failure of
  WP:NFCC#8. None of the keep arguments indicate what significant increase in understanding this image generates or what detrimental effects would occur from its omission.—Kww(talk) 21:12, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 09:07, 20 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:ST-TNG Firstborn.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Cburnett (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR:

• Keep All It's covered by fair use law.[50] The image is not decorative it helps to identify the episode, illustrate key plot points, and provides visual reference to the episodes thematic elements, and style. After all this is a visual medium and a picture is worth a thousands words as they say. I believe that the Star Trek episode pages could use more illustrations across the board. I also don't believe that one user should arbitrarily mass submit images for deletion. The use of images to illustrate a TV episode is very common site wide and generally held as acceptable and legal. --Mccordscvs (talk) 12:50, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep all and stop mass nominating things. You understand the episode more seeing the image from it. Dream Focus 01:29, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per Richwales (see File:STMatterofHonor.jpg. As stated by others below, these images are illustrative of the episodes and increase understanding, so their use seems appropriate. Such images are so widely used in episode articles that the wider community seems to support their use, so wider community discussion as proposed by Richwales seems necessary. --AussieLegend (✉) 16:00, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]