Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2014 July 4

< July 3	July 5 >

July 4

File:Megaphone screenshot.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: kept in new reduced format - Peripitus (Talk) 12:55, 12 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This screenshot encompasses several non-free works, each belonging to several authors, which is itself a violation of

WP:NFCC#1, the entire image is redundant and words alone are enough to serve its very simple purpose. Codename Lisa (talk) 07:59, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply

]

Keep I don't see this at all. What "several non-free works"? It's a screenshot of one message from a single program. NFCC#3 does not apply. The image is not redundant because it is the only screenshot. So NFCC#1 does not apply. --John Nagle (talk) 18:17, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. The "several non-free works" refers to
WP:NFCC#1, it cannot exist. Best regards, Codename Lisa (talk) 06:00, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply
]

Cropped image to remove icons from Windows toolbar. The argument that "words alone can replace it" would apply to almost any image. John Nagle (talk) 18:55, 6 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Taskbar, not toolbar. And the latter is a far-from-truth argument that chiefly uploaders make. The main purpose of this image just to show one sentence among the non-free decoration. That sentence itself is copyright-free. In Wikipedia, one should learn to let go of non-free things; although I don't insist if don't wish to. Best regards, Codename Lisa (talk) 06:44, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It's useful to retain the image because the content is controversial and involves a matter of public interest. This is appropriate use of non-free content. John Nagle (talk) 20:03, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

WP:NFCC. Best regards, Codename Lisa (talk) 20:30, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply

]

Keep after every problematic elements were cropped out. It's certainly not replaceable with text alone. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 05:59, 11 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:M22locustincombat.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as

F8 by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:31, 12 July 2014 (UTC)[reply

]

This file has been moved to Wikicommon by myself(link:[1]).So there is no need to reserve it in enwikipedia.

Fu7ラジオ❂留言於民國103年暨 10:37, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply

]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Sacco vanzetti sculpture.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:31, 12 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is one of several photos by artist

disrupt Wikipedia by having photographs of himself (he is the figure in the right of the photo) uploaded in various places. Rasputinfa is his original account. He was later blocked as Superbrightidea and Albianmoonlight. —Ryūlóng (琉竜) 13:27, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply

]

DELETE: per Ryulong talk→ WPPilot 14:01, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Deliberate disruption of Wikipedia in the name of "art" — Alan / Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 17:53, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Lynn lee.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:31, 12 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Poor photo of no encyclopedic quality, uploaded by a user who has been actively disrupting Wikipedia as part of an art project. —Ryūlóng (琉竜) 13:28, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

DELETE: per Ryulong talk→ WPPilot 14:51, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Deliberate disruption of Wikipedia in the name of "art" — Alan / Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 17:53, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:WRWAC's Jim Baranski receiving 2013 Governor's Environmental Excellence Award.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:31, 12 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fails

WP:NFCC#8, shows a person receiving an award which is easily understood without the image. January (talk) 18:22, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply

]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Southwick House Postcard.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Wrong forum. The file is on Commons. Please nominate it for deletion there if you still feel it should be deleted. AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:15, 4 July 2014 (UTC) Request deletion of this image as a higher quality, identical image is posted at File: 041 Elm St Duckett House Smith College.jpg I am uploader of both.[reply]

WindingRoad (talk) 18:44, 4 July 2014 (UTC)WingdingRoad[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.