Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Fluorescent Grey EP/1

Fluorescent Grey EP

Most recent review

Result: No action. No progress is being made on the article and this reassessment has received no attention; renomination at GAN is recommended. Geometry guy 22:28, 11 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

In a similar case to that of

, which is a bit different), although no specific examples are given. He was also critical of my use of primary sources, which do take up a sizable chunk of the article, although I posted the following on his talk page:

"

" to use a made-up term from a Wikipedia essay: it's not the music itself, which would really be a primary source, but it's still self-published by the band.

Before this story gets too long, I'll say that I asked MisterWiki on his talk page to reconsider his review. He told me if I relisted it at GAN he would review it again, although just today he was indefinitely blocked for sockpuppetry and block evasion, among other things. His block appeal was rejected, although he put a second appeal template on his talk page. In light of that, I would really appreciate it if I could have

]

(note: MisterWiki has been conditionally unblocked.) --gakon^{5 (talk / contribs)} 01:00, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]