Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/The Sword of Shannara/1
The Sword of Shannara
- Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • • Most recent review
- Result: Kept, no consensus for delisting talk) 22:24, 1 June 2014 (UTC)]
Suggesting that a GA reassessment be done on
general notability have changed considerably since 2008. Cheers. N2e (talk) 20:15, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
]
- Would you be willing to point out the unreliable sources present in the article? I mean, now that the unreliable sources you added and one other are now removed. [majestic titan] 16:53, 7 February 2014 (UTC)]
- Thanks for cleaning up that text following the Merge! I certainly had no intentionality in adding any unreliable sources; I merely completed a Merge that had been the consensus of a recent AfD (and that source article seems to have had a number of non-WP:RSsources) in it). I have removed that part of my comment above. I have no particular problem with any particular sources that are currently in the article now.
- I continue to think that the article should have a GA reassessment six years on, for the other reasons I've stated above. I'll also add one more: it appears that the Plot summary is rather excessively long, per plot}} however, and will just leave it to other GA reviewers to evaluate the article against all current GA criteria. Cheers. N2e (talk) 17:25, 8 February 2014 (UTC)]
- Thanks for cleaning up that text following the Merge! I certainly had no intentionality in adding any unreliable sources; I merely completed a Merge that had been the consensus of a recent AfD (and that source article seems to have had a number of non-
- Demote due to prose issues. DragonZero (Talk · Contribs) 10:12, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
- Keep per bad-faith nomination. Even if the plot summary is a a bit lengthy, that's not a large enough problem to warrant demotion. [majestic titan] 19:38, 19 April 2014 (UTC)]