Wikipedia:Peer review/Avengers: Age of Ultron/archive1

Add links
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Avengers: Age of Ultron

Toolbox
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch peer review

This peer review discussion has been closed.
This article falls within the scope of

being nominated for a Good Topic. In order to proceed with this nomination, this article needs to be peer-reviewed. Thanks. --Ditto51 (My Talk Page) 00:22, 1 March 2015 (UTC)[reply
]

Comments from Darkwarriorblake
  • General
    • There are a few duplicate links, though it's hard to find them all since the script doesn't seem to detect text in the cast list. There is a dupe to
      Ulysses Klaw
      in the post-production section, and a few cast members in the same section as well like Mackie, Falcon, Skarsgard, Selvig
    • Current page size is perfectly fine, well below any limits.
  • Infobox
    • The Starring infobox section is excessive and clearly all these people cannot be the stars, there is an option to simply list the star billing at the top of the poster when this situation arises and it might be beneficial to do this to be more general. Since the cast section seems to be reflecting this lengthy list, following the top block would also allow all those single sentence cast members to be moved down rather than awkwardly messing with the layout between the cast members with a great deal of prose dedicated to them, particularly between Maria Hill and Ultron.
  • I had a similar feeling on this. We have always used the billing block listings as the guide here, but I do agree that it is a bit excessive. I would not be opposed to reducing this to the top billing and just make note some how of the others. @TriiipleThreat, Richiekim, and Adamstom.97: thoughts on doing this? - Favre1fan93 (talk) 23:57, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Its an ensemble film, which have large casts, so it is possible that they all are receiving starring credits. I see no reason to deviate from guidelines.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 00:10, 15 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • I agree with Triiiple - we don't know what role some of these characters will play in the film, and just because we haven't seen them in the trailers yet doesn't mean they don't have substantial co-starring roles in the film. I don't see any reason to break what has become a great consistency streak with these articles just because there are a few more starring cast members in this film compared to some of the others. And the top billing doesn't even include Taylor-Johnson and Olsen, who clearly are starring in the film as well, so I think we should keep it as is. - adamstom97 (talk) 00:24, 15 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Eh, I think it's fair to say there is a main cast and then a supporting cast, and people considered to have starring roles, hence why there are those much more limited names at the top and visible. But whatever, it's not a huge deal. Darkwarriorblake / SEXY ACTION TALK PAGE! 22:23, 15 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    • Can Ben Davis be mentioned somewhere in the prose as part of the filming section so the Ref doesn't have to be in the infobox?
    • If Danny Elfman isn't the main source of music, does he need to be here?
  • We are not quite clear on the exact extent of his involvement, but would not mind if it was not in there until we had further confirmation. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 23:57, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • We do know that his involvement is to do with the main theme though, and it was significant enough to be listed in the billing block, so don't see why we can't just leave him there with the "additional" tag. If it turns out that he only contributed work for a single scene or even just the end credits, then perhaps we could rethink this then, but for now we should just stick with what we know from the billing block. - adamstom97 (talk) 00:24, 15 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Cast
    • " where she's realizing — and it's kind of a continuation of Cap 2", maybe change Cap 2 to The Winter Soldier or Captain America: The Winter Soldier
    • Should Quicksilver and Scarlet Witch be described as "newly recruited Avenger"s if that's not how they're to be introduced in the film? It's kinda like introducing Alexander Pierce as "The secret head of HYDRA running shield who initially is a good guy".
  • I think it was just to make not that they are new members ie not returning from the first film. Maybe better wording can be used. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 23:57, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Marketing
    • Really wouldn't hurt to have an example image of marketing here given how big this section is.
  • Maybe not an image, but a sound clip of the Pinocchio music from the trailer? - Favre1fan93 (talk) 23:57, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • I would support the inclusion of the Pinocchio music, if that was possible. - adamstom97 (talk) 00:24, 15 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Lets wait and see. We might possibly obtain some more free images from D23 or the films premiere, in which case we move around images of the cast. We should refrain from adding any more NFC than necessary.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 00:18, 15 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • The section as a whole is large but the part specific talking about Pinocchio is small and wouldn't justify it's inclusion. And elaborating on it would only give it
    WP:UNDUE weight.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 23:21, 15 March 2015 (UTC)[reply
    ]
    • Is there opportunity for sub headers? There's a merchandising section, could the reception be a sub section or is there room to break off info about the trailers and posters for easier digestion under the markketing banner?

Added some responses. Thanks!! - Favre1fan93 (talk) 23:57, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Stuff seems to have been addressed. Good work. Darkwarriorblake / SEXY ACTION TALK PAGE! 22:23, 15 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Peer_review/Avengers:_Age_of_Ultron/archive1&oldid=655515541"