Search results
Appearance
Did you mean: Wikipedia:peer review butter include css styles.css
The page "Wikipedia:Peer review/Butter/include/css/styles.css" does not exist. You can request that it be created, but consider checking the search results below to see whether the topic is already covered.
- This page contains the Peer review requests that are older than one month, have received no response in the last two weeks, are not signed, or did not...7 KB (71,878 words) - 00:57, 24 May 2008
- academic peer review before being published as a journal article. This model is also compatible with the recent practice of improving and peer-reviewing existing...49 bytes (10,253 words) - 00:58, 7 November 2023
- experimenting with using CSS to change the displayed title at the top of the page. However, lacking extensive knowledge of CSS and Wikipedia's styles, I have not been...201 KB (29,959 words) - 10:22, 21 March 2023
- editor dismissing any source I cite (including peer reviewed optometric journals), while they include opinion pieces if it fits their narrative. 3. I...399 KB (53,703 words) - 21:00, 11 June 2022
- and wikipedia is so much more stylable than uncyclopedia... could be fun. Be pretty trivial to then add the vector css to the monobook gadget to make...330 KB (48,554 words) - 00:53, 21 March 2023
- August 2007 (UTC) You'll want to look in http://en.wikipedia.org/style/monobook/main.css, I think. TenOfAllTrades(talk) 02:31, 20 August 2007 (UTC) To clarify...54 KB (8,109 words) - 03:35, 25 March 2023
- Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)/Archive 145 (section Meta: Consultation on the creation of a separate user group for editing sitewide CSS/JS)Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 11:19, 20 July 2018 (UTC) Rambling peer-reviewed text and poorly-sourced bullet lists have both long been staples of...302 KB (44,126 words) - 12:17, 24 September 2021
- letters above? As I said - there is a new wave of mixing styles etc... and these and these styles have gaind much popularity and thus they would be mixed...8 KB (99,383 words) - 20:26, 18 October 2022
- 21 May 2006 (UTC) The peer review has been archived, that means this article should gain featured status. <p border="1" style="outset">cheung1303</p>...5 KB (73,226 words) - 18:09, 23 October 2008
- there is no evidence that the information on that website has been peer reviewed for factual accuracy. Try seeing if the player has a profile on Soccerway...401 KB (53,225 words) - 22:41, 28 September 2022
- Scorpion0422 23:00, 31 October 2007 (UTC) Well, the usual. A really useful peer review has provided me with the confidence to bring this article to the scrutiny...3 KB (38,074 words) - 19:48, 18 November 2010
- Wikipedia:Teahouse/Questions/Archive 1094 (section How do we have someone other that Bidgee review our edits)February 2021 (UTC) Article reviewing can take days, weeks, or months. Depends on how fast reviewers get through 'em. WhoAteMyButter (📨│📝) 06:49, 3 February...402 KB (51,586 words) - 03:55, 3 March 2023
- Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive859 (section User:Chesivoirzr regarding psychology articles or articles that include psychological perspectives)quoted what Totilo wrote? There is no need for a review score to exist, but only an article. --Butter and Cream (talk) 04:24, 18 October 2014 (UTC) They...692 KB (97,492 words) - 10:52, 3 April 2023
- Wikipedia:Teahouse/Questions/Archive 1120 (section Best Way To Include Media Reference For Article Not Available Online)It's my personal opinion that people don't take full advantage of the peer review and mentoring process that's available here on wiki. I recommend them...402 KB (54,724 words) - 04:40, 18 April 2023
- Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)/Archive 120 (section Wikipedia's "Manual of Style/Text formatting" should allow boldfacing of "row headings")reversions over typos in wikitext formatting, because the source is "only" a peer-reviewed journal article, things that ought to be moved to another article rather...413 KB (59,255 words) - 03:22, 3 March 2023
- Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive581 (section Fix user Killamanmatt1's monobook.css file)insisting in putting pictures of peanut butter on a page about the glass transition. I put up with the peanut butter for awhile (as did other polite editors)...651 KB (90,370 words) - 04:47, 14 March 2023
- (UTC) Hi there. I'm working on doing a peer review here: Wikipedia:Peer review/Logic/archive2 As part of the review I did a gentle re-write of the lead section;...400 KB (52,043 words) - 09:32, 16 October 2022
- current state, which I think is up to FA standards. It has gone through peer review and is currently listed as a good article. Ari 00:31, 12 May 2006 (UTC)...3 KB (98,937 words) - 13:22, 30 August 2010
- Wikipedia:Teahouse/Questions/Archive 1159 (section A linked page does not include the word it is supposed to expand or clarify)(UTC) I would like feedback on a stub article prior to submission a review by peers. Deanna Coakley (talk) 15:45, 20 July 2022 (UTC) Assuming the article...399 KB (56,925 words) - 14:50, 11 September 2022
- in 109 languages, plus the jury is 211 persons and entries are blind peer reviewed, and the competition is being organized since 2009, we published 47...401 KB (54,163 words) - 03:54, 3 March 2023
- of their peer review status. JeepdaySock (talk) 10:52, 13 March 2012 (UTC) Without prior publication, it would come down to Wikipedia-style notability