Search results
Appearance
The page "Wikipedia:Peer review/Fred Keenor/assets/include/js/speech.js" does not exist. You can request that it be created, but consider checking the search results below to see whether the topic is already covered.
- How to review a featured article candidate)character. The article passed GAN in January of this year, and underwent a peer review in April, with feedback from both worked into the article. Additional...4 KB (165,534 words) - 00:05, 2 August 2024preprints and other non-peer-reviewed sources should not be used. Editors are reminded that onus is on the editor seeking to include disputed content to achieve...701 KB (99,752 words) - 17:50, 3 March 2023examines Wikipedia’s use of open access research and scholarship, that is, peer-reviewed journal articles that have been made freely available online. " March...176 KB (19,121 words) - 14:37, 23 July 2024Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive524 (section National Council of La Raza protected - need version review)don't make decisions by !vote, and you will be careful with your long-term assets, which means you are unlikely to compromise them by truly disruptive behavior...416 KB (51,495 words) - 10:58, 3 April 2023which convention I am using along with references to some textbooks and peer-reviewed articles which use the same convention. In addition, to establish even...401 KB (53,706 words) - 21:50, 24 March 2022because they were supported by peer-reviewed research - he removed my previous one because it was supported by a review of the literature. Something is...691 KB (94,086 words) - 04:50, 3 April 2023that Wikipedia is not meant as a remedy against the side effects of the peer-review system. Or, as I put it there, according to WP:GREATWRONGS Wikipedia...301 KB (43,692 words) - 09:35, 3 April 2023page to collaborate on certain matters, like putting it forward for peer review. It seems contrary, to me, to suggest otherwise.--John Cline (talk) 20:58...819 KB (112,367 words) - 16:36, 9 March 2023in the peer reviewed causal review correctly and in the same way the authors plainly state my interpretation. Why do you believe that the peer reviewers...784 KB (107,425 words) - 11:38, 13 March 2023Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive828 (section Please review my block of Clavdia chauchat)Shoebat, I read several different religious scholar's reviews of his theory. Being peer reviewed and a well know theory I posted the information only after...1,004 KB (134,580 words) - 09:29, 3 April 2023User:Nathan2055/afc.js pushed over User:mabdul/afc_beta.js and User:Nathan2055/afc stable.js pushed over MediaWiki:Gadget-afchelper.js. I've already added...711 KB (97,582 words) - 04:49, 14 March 2023Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive838 (section Wikipedia:Editor review/Cwmhiraeth)"criminalising". Much better to regard them as a form of interactive peer review. Similar processes are familiar to people writing in many other contexts...619 KB (82,713 words) - 23:44, 3 March 2023adding an unreliable source to Helium.com as his chosen source, a "peer reviewed citizen journalism website". FellGleaming then begin making a series...605 KB (79,918 words) - 07:35, 10 May 2024they are very highly sourced on the page (e.g. xkcd). Pages undergo peer review in a process similar to every other wiki out there. Tropes are selected...478 KB (71,097 words) - 03:22, 3 March 2023American Academy of Pediatrics, which is not the result of a scientific, peer-reviewed study and not the opinion of the institution as a whole. In addition...796 KB (107,420 words) - 04:43, 11 May 2024Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive859 (section User:Chesivoirzr regarding psychology articles or articles that include psychological perspectives)org/w/index.php?title=List_of_assets_owned_by_21st_Century_Fox&action=history https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_assets_owned_by_News_Corp&action=history...692 KB (97,492 words) - 10:52, 3 April 2023)