Search results
Appearance
The page "Wikipedia:Peer review/Fred Keenor/assets/js/language-change.js" does not exist. You can request that it be created, but consider checking the search results below to see whether the topic is already covered.
- This page contains the Peer review requests that are older than one month, have received no response in the last two weeks, are not signed, have become...11 KB (106,727 words) - 23:49, 14 December 2019
- This page contains the Peer review requests that are older than one month, have received no response in the last two weeks, are not signed, have become...11 KB (93,422 words) - 12:28, 20 February 2008
- This page contains the Peer review requests that are older than one month, have received no response in the last two weeks, are not signed, have become...11 KB (107,381 words) - 06:00, 1 December 2010
- This page contains the Peer review requests that are older than one month, have received no response in the last two weeks, are not signed, have become...8 KB (108,182 words) - 02:32, 11 February 2016
- This page contains the Peer review requests that are older than one month, have received no response in the last two weeks, are not signed, have become...13 KB (139,060 words) - 03:44, 3 July 2008
- associated with Tamilnation. It is paper publshed in a conference where peer reviewed paper are presented by reputable authors of the field. Wiki cite has...252 KB (34,741 words) - 10:37, 21 March 2023
- to have at least one reference to a reliable source published in a peer reviewed journal, because sooner or later someone will add a ref tag to it. We...701 KB (92,490 words) - 22:58, 17 February 2024
- that Wikipedia is not meant as a remedy against the side effects of the peer-review system. Or, as I put it there, according to WP:GREATWRONGS Wikipedia...301 KB (43,692 words) - 09:35, 3 April 2023
- Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive1002 (section Fred Howe (footballer, born 1912))the fact that EB is considered a poor quality source when there are peer-reviewed scholarly works that don't simplify the issue and are considered the...801 KB (102,257 words) - 05:22, 10 May 2024
- Wikipedia:Teahouse/Questions/Archive 1093 (section To translate a existed Wikipedia academic article into my language)an image would change that. David notMD (talk) 12:10, 29 January 2021 (UTC) i would like this page deleted as its not notable enough FredBensen (talk) 09:47...402 KB (54,067 words) - 16:47, 31 May 2024
- Wikipedia:Press coverage 2007 (category CS1 Finnish-language sources (fi))examines Wikipedia’s use of open access research and scholarship, that is, peer-reviewed journal articles that have been made freely available online. " March...176 KB (19,121 words) - 14:17, 28 September 2023
- which convention I am using along with references to some textbooks and peer-reviewed articles which use the same convention. In addition, to establish even...401 KB (53,706 words) - 21:50, 24 March 2022
- Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive524 (section National Council of La Raza protected - need version review)venue, WP:NOR/N. — neuro(talk)(review) 14:01, 24 March 2009 (UTC) I'm having trouble with agressive OR at Cimbrian language, see User talk:Spinach Monster...416 KB (51,495 words) - 10:58, 3 April 2023
- Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive859 (section Mass deletion of language articles by Ryulong)org/w/index.php?title=List_of_assets_owned_by_21st_Century_Fox&action=history https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_assets_owned_by_News_Corp&action=history...692 KB (97,492 words) - 10:52, 3 April 2023
- similar FLs, but I've made changes to the introduction, among other things. This has been through one of the shortest peer reviews in FLC history, which I...4 KB (39,527 words) - 06:18, 8 September 2015
- in the peer reviewed causal review correctly and in the same way the authors plainly state my interpretation. Why do you believe that the peer reviewers...784 KB (107,425 words) - 11:38, 13 March 2023
- Preprints are preliminary reports of work that have not been certified by peer review. They should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related...701 KB (99,752 words) - 17:50, 3 March 2023
- they are very highly sourced on the page (e.g. xkcd). Pages undergo peer review in a process similar to every other wiki out there. Tropes are selected...478 KB (71,132 words) - 03:22, 3 March 2023
- adding an unreliable source to Helium.com as his chosen source, a "peer reviewed citizen journalism website". FellGleaming then begin making a series...605 KB (79,918 words) - 07:35, 10 May 2024
- they appear. If you're keen on keeping refs out of the lead, you could just avoid using quotes there. I do think that peer review is the right way to go...807 bytes (25,120 words) - 14:50, 23 August 2016