Search results
Appearance
The page "Wikipedia:Peer review/United Abominations/include/js/speech.js" does not exist. You can request that it be created, but consider checking the search results below to see whether the topic is already covered.
- making various claims about what the proposed Common.js code does and doesn't do, I figured I'd review and analyze it. Here's what this code will do, as...730 KB (101,274 words) - 09:10, 19 February 2024
- Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive791 (section Copyright violation in inaccessible .js settings user page)writer and vice-president of Taj Group of Hotels? Has he submitted a peer reviewed thesis? Yogesh Khandke (talk) 16:38, 28 March 2013 (UTC) Yogesh, I have...714 KB (97,494 words) - 14:34, 21 April 2023
- Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Featured log/September 2015 (section United States v. Washington)Wars. The article has previously received GA status and undergone a peer review in January 2015. Midnightblueowl (talk) 20:17, 22 August 2015 (UTC) Comments...2 KB (73,699 words) - 00:20, 30 September 2015
- Wikipedia:Village pump (idea lab)/Archive 5 (section A peer review thank you template to incentivize, reward, and quantify helpful peer reviews)than you probably need. To recognize peer reviews, you'd probably need to be able to include a link to the review given, to the article title and perhaps...307 KB (45,081 words) - 10:21, 15 October 2023
- Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)/Archive 129 (section Model release - medical photos and more - legal review - WMF grant proposal)letting Conservapedia get a right to include their point of view in our articles. Free speech means you have to accept speech from people you disagree with....273 KB (33,446 words) - 02:22, 2 July 2023
- Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Archive321 (section Review of the indefinite block of Cesdeva)based on unreliable source(an anti-Muslim hate blog), In the Quran, abominations include idolatry, divination, gambling, and intoxicants; eating blood, dead...679 KB (92,243 words) - 06:32, 10 February 2023
- Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive168 (section Can someone review my indef block of User:Vlh?)article is a "Good Article", having gone through an RFC to make it NPOV, a peer review, and the GA nomination process. Thank you. Ovadyah 19:19, 30 December...201 KB (29,666 words) - 01:55, 3 March 2023
- eleventh album, United Abominations, was released May of the following year. or even just Megadeth's eleventh album, United Abominations, was released May...3 KB (119,438 words) - 13:53, 29 August 2014
- Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive642 (section Admin closure requested at Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Naming conventions for United States federal buildings)would discuss this situation, meanwhile editing one of his other tagging abominations. The "too long" tag is also not helpful on a high level article about...605 KB (79,918 words) - 07:35, 10 May 2024
- in the peer reviewed causal review correctly and in the same way the authors plainly state my interpretation. Why do you believe that the peer reviewers...784 KB (107,425 words) - 11:38, 13 March 2023
- quotes which I include from the speech. I chose the quotes I did either to (a) make that point, which was the majore point of Nixon's speech, (b) because...4 KB (175,513 words) - 16:56, 30 June 2009
- the Spire of Dublin, is a worthy successor. After a pretty thorough peer review and some excellent suggestions for improvements, we feel it is ready...2 KB (76,943 words) - 20:25, 30 March 2016
- "his"?; Note I: "and described them as welcomely absent of the "foreign abominations"" - not "absent of" - "free from" or something. Reworded. Ceoil (talk)...2 KB (142,745 words) - 17:40, 30 December 2020
- others than Dr. McCulloch (the inventor of the theory). A peer reviewed papers is indeed peer reviewed that means independent referees and editor(s) have endorsed...801 KB (108,826 words) - 16:59, 3 April 2022
- that "It is important that original hypotheses that have gone through peer review do not get presented in Wikipedia as representing scientific consensus...682 KB (90,884 words) - 20:43, 28 January 2023
- Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive123 (section Battle of Deir Yassin/Deir Yassin massacre: move poll closure review requested)That's freedom of speech. --Aminz 03:02, 25 July 2006 (UTC) He has no such right; quite the opposite, as a matter of fact. "Freedom of speech" simply means...308 KB (46,111 words) - 10:37, 21 March 2023
- Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive1073 (section Could somebody review and decide on this?)what more do we want? The point about WP is that it is so strongly peer-reviewed that there is no advantage to paying. Frankly if a person is daft enough...719 KB (95,345 words) - 14:40, 1 March 2024
- article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was Delete. ---J.S (T/C/WRE) 21:34, 5 January 2007 (UTC)...8 KB (80,730 words) - 20:17, 18 October 2022
- Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Featured log/February 2022 (section Source review from Ealdgyth)several gold medals representing the United States in youth tournaments. This article briefly went through a peer review and I believe it meets the criteria...2 KB (154,928 words) - 21:41, 28 February 2022
- tried out Special:Random/Wikipedia. I got a VFD page, an AFD page, and a peer review. Neat feature. Never knew you could get random pages from anything other...683 KB (103,963 words) - 15:43, 3 May 2024
- prevented by the requirement that works be "published in a medium that includes peer review or editorial controls; this excludes self-publication". Unfortunately