Wikipedia:Peer review/Venues of the 2016 Summer Olympics/archive1

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Venues of the 2016 Summer Olympics

This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because I want to nominate it for FLC.

Regards, Felipe Menegaz 00:19, 5 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by Parutakupiu (talk)

Lead:

  • "will be an international multi-sport event to be held in Rio de Janeiro..." – Unlink "international" and remove "to be";
Done. Felipe Menegaz 15:59, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Choose between "pre-exisiting" or "existing", when referring to the venue status;
Done. Felipe Menegaz 15:59, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Why are golf and rubgy sevens frequently capitalized?
Done. Felipe Menegaz 15:59, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Any developments on the IGF decision concerning the golf venue?
No. Felipe Menegaz 15:59, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • "Rio de Janeiro is planning to hold all the competitions inside the city..." – Rio de Janeiro or ROCOG?
Both. Felipe Menegaz 15:59, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
But ROCOG already includes city officials, no? In my opinion ROCOG suits better, but I won't make a fuss over it.
Done. Felipe Menegaz 22:28, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • "...officialy known as Jornalista Mário Filho Stadium..." – Forgot an "l" in "officially";
Done. Felipe Menegaz 15:59, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

General:

  • I don't see the need to explicit in every section title that they are competition venues, unless you also have sections for non-competition venues, which you don't;
Based on
List of 2008 Summer Olympics venues. Felipe Menegaz 15:59, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply
]
OK, but I think that the Beijing page should have that dealt with in some way, as well. Actually, I don't know why there aren't any mentions to the non-competition venues, such as the Olympic Village, MPC and IBC in these pages...
Working on it. Felipe Menegaz 22:30, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Many of the Olympic venues were already used for the 2007 Pan Ams, so you should add some adequately licensed images of those. If you do, don't forget to add a proper alt text;
What about add pictures (some non-free) to the tables? Felipe Menegaz 16:16, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Fine by me, provided the tables are kept simple and their layout isn't majorly disrupted. Parutakupiu (talk) 00:57, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Done. Felipe Menegaz 22:30, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Remove that "Pic." header and place the image column under the "Venue" header. It's a pity that they appear so small... If you didn't add images for all venues, then you could place those images outside the tables, but I prefer to have pics if they are available. We gotta find a way of having them all, but bigger. I will think of something. Parutakupiu (talk) 22:51, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I was thinking to add lots of iformation such as coordinates, building cost, constructions years, location (Olympic zone), etc. We gotta find a way of having them all... Felipe Menegaz 02:38, 9 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • There are plenty of redirects and some of them should be fixed.
Working on it. Felipe Menegaz 01:33, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comments by Carioca (talk)

Red links:

  • There are several red links in this page. Are you planning to create articles for each one of the red links?
Yes. Felipe Menegaz 22:28, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Notes:

  • There is a typo in the Notes section: 'Although the official opening of the games is scheduled to be on August 5, 2016, football matchs will begin on August 3" – Forgot an "E" in "matches";
Done. Felipe Menegaz 22:28, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Competition venues:

  • Are you planning to add images to all the competition venues (the following sections lack images, at the moment: Existing competition venues, Temporary competition venues and Competition venues outside Rio de Janeiro)?
Yes. I stopped because I was thinking in adding the non-free images to the existing venues. These venues will be renovated and would be interesting to use the non-free images to show how they will look like in 2016. Felipe Menegaz 22:28, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]