Search results
Appearance
Did you mean: Wikipedia:portal peer review library_and_information_science assets include css include js speeches
The page "Wikipedia:Portal peer review/Library and information science/assets/include/css/include/js/speech.js" does not exist. You can request that it be created, but consider checking the search results below to see whether the topic is already covered.
- JavaScript, HTML, Css, Node.js, among others. Is also a teacher, speaker at conferences, co-founder of BrazilJS Foundation and BrazilJS Conference, which...242 KB (25,181 words) - 05:52, 30 July 2024
- This page contains the Peer review requests that are older than one month, have received no response in the last two weeks, are not signed, or did not...7 KB (71,878 words) - 00:57, 24 May 2008
- Spamming Speech synthesis Spyware Storm botnet Ubuntu Wikipedia Windows 2000 Windows XP World Wide Web X Window System List of mergers and acquisitions...386 KB (27,219 words) - 13:47, 10 August 2024
- Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)/Archive 64 (section DynamicPageList and revamping Portal:Current events)Create MediaWiki:Wikibugs.js, copy the whole thing into it (translated into English), put this into MediaWiki:Wikibugs.css, and put the line...352 KB (50,634 words) - 12:59, 15 October 2023
- Wikipedia:Village pump (idea lab)/Archive 1 (section Change of the HTML-page-title from vector.js ?)on the fly from IPA strings. It's doable! :D We could even include it globally in common.js or something, provided that it's implemented on a progressive...307 KB (44,631 words) - 19:12, 7 September 2022
- Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)/Archive 98 (section Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (natural sciences))least in the standard CSS files) link and ending up in a foreign language Wikipedia is often better than getting no information at all. —Kusma (t·c) 04:10...406 KB (59,517 words) - 05:38, 14 March 2023
- Wikipedia:Village pump (idea lab)/Archive 5 (section A peer review thank you template to incentivize, reward, and quantify helpful peer reviews)probably need. To recognize peer reviews, you'd probably need to be able to include a link to the review given, to the article title and perhaps a signature for...307 KB (45,082 words) - 04:58, 16 August 2024
- Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)/Archive 56 (section Wikipedia's Expert Peer Review process (or lack of such) for Science related articles)JS), but that's why printing fails; I asked this before and it's not just changing the media type for CSS; IIRC, JS will react independent of the CSS...224 KB (32,090 words) - 19:09, 20 March 2024
- 2011 (UTC) Note that the #sitenotice CSS thing will hide absolutely every banner and notice ever. So that includes non-fundraising banners announcing things...251 KB (32,923 words) - 06:23, 14 March 2023
- Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)/Archive 70 (section Revolutionizing Peer review and the accademic Process through wiki: Involving the Professors and digitizing academia)The CSS is now at User:Gadget850/talkhighlight.css. You can test it by importing it to Special:MyPage/skin.js: importStylesheet('Us...302 KB (99,822 words) - 13:14, 4 June 2022
- Wikipedia:Help desk/Archive 30 (section Portal: Three Kingdoms and Portal: Second Age confusing Wikipedia?)Information of all kinds, factual or no (fact or opinion) are legal and public domain. Freedom of speech and all that. Only copyrighted pictures and such...275 KB (41,449 words) - 15:38, 15 April 2023
- Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Featured log/January 2022 (section Comments and copyright review by Buidhe)liquid assets") and don't require the holding of cash in the form of bank reserves. The source says This increase was mainly due to large-scale asset purchases...2 KB (103,894 words) - 21:38, 31 January 2022
- are not going to be multiple high-quality peer-reviewed books on every subject, and not every peer-reviewed history book is written in a way that makes...687 KB (94,992 words) - 20:45, 4 February 2023
- Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Archive226 (section Request for community sanction against uploading images of Anders Behring Breivik from his manifesto)css. But you can construct a URL to get the software to tell you that. Just click http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Main_Page&action=view and...715 KB (79,148 words) - 08:07, 3 April 2023
- Wikipedia:Teahouse/Questions/Archive 1195 (section This is my first contribution. Is it OK to put the following article through PEER REVIEW?)Wikipedia:Reliable sources and Wikipedia:Verifiability. For example, according to Wikipedia:Verifiability, "academic and peer-reviewed publications are usually...394 KB (54,822 words) - 16:38, 19 January 2024
- obligations. But here we are now after extensive research and a peer review. I look forward to feedback, and will try to address comments quickly. Thanks. WesleyDodds...4 KB (151,634 words) - 16:53, 12 October 2009
- been significant input from other users since the peer review stage on both factual information and copyediting of the text. On the question of making...4 KB (181,967 words) - 12:09, 20 October 2020
- google (include quotes) and you will find numerous reviews and criticisms which use this, including many from peer-reviewed scholarly literature. I know...13 KB (156,231 words) - 00:41, 18 October 2022
- Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive1112 (section Template:Ethiopian wars and insurgencies detailed map and Module:Ethiopian wars and insurgencies detailed map)propaganda. I was talking about your removal of peer-reviewed sources that disagreed with your POV and sent a disruptive link to my page just because I...822 KB (109,036 words) - 10:52, 1 November 2023
- Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Archive228 (section Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2011 October 8#Equestria Daily and Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject Santana)Hallam article is peer reviewed so we should accept that it is reliable. Moran is on the revisionist side of the History wars and is considered fringe...705 KB (91,916 words) - 07:30, 7 May 2024
- section of Wikisource:What Wikisource includes#Scientific research in that the first two entries emphasize peer review and the last one emphasizes notability