Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2008 February 11

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Remember the dot (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:30, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

claimed GFDL-self, but looks obviously taken from band promotional materials —Steven G. Johnson (talk) 02:59, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by

claimed GFDL-self, but appears to be from promo. materials and no evidence created by user —Steven G. Johnson (talk) 03:00, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep; file is tagged as non-free.-FASTILY ^(TALK) 22:52, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

album cover claimed GFDL-self, unlikely —Steven G. Johnson (talk) 03:02, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Y correct (c) & FU added

talk) 04:48, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

• Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with {{
  dfu}} or list it at WP:Non-free content review. AnomieBOT⚡ 01:30, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by

band logo claimed GFDL-self, unlikely —Steven G. Johnson (talk) 03:03, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep; file is tagged as non-free.-FASTILY ^(TALK) 22:53, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

album cover claimed GFDL-self, unlikely —Steven G. Johnson (talk) 03:04, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Y correct (c) & FUR added

talk) 04:49, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

• Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with {{
  dfu}} or list it at WP:Non-free content review. AnomieBOT⚡ 01:30, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep; file is tagged as non-free.-FASTILY ^(TALK) 22:54, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

album cover claimed GFDL-self —Steven G. Johnson (talk) 03:05, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Y correct (C) and FUR added

talk) 04:51, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

• Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with {{
  dfu}} or list it at WP:Non-free content review. AnomieBOT⚡ 01:30, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as

claimed GFDL-self, unlikely —Steven G. Johnson (talk) 03:07, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as

claimed "free use" and GFDL-self because "shows up in a number of blogs" (sigh) —Steven G. Johnson (talk) 03:09, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I was given permission to use the photo by Grandmaster of Abir, Yehoshua Sofer who is in the picture and the owner of the picture. He can be contacted at [email protected]EhavEliyahu (talk) 19:49, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Personal vague assurances that we can "use" the image are insufficient for Wikipedia. See

WP:COPYREQ. —Steven G. Johnson (talk) 03:27, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as

I was given permission to use the photo by Grandmaster of Abir, Yehoshua Sofer who is in the picture and the owner of the picture. He can be contacted at [email protected]EhavEliyahu (talk) 19:50, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as

I was given permission to use the photo by Grandmaster of Abir, Yehoshua Sofer who is in the picture and the owner of the picture. He can be contacted at [email protected]EhavEliyahu (talk) 19:50, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as

I was given permission to use the photo by Grandmaster of Abir, Yehoshua Sofer who is in the picture and the owner of the picture. He can be contacted at [email protected]EhavEliyahu (talk) 19:59, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as

I was given permission to use the photo by Grandmaster of Abir, Yehoshua Sofer who is in the picture and the owner of the picture. He can be contacted at [email protected]EhavEliyahu (talk) 19:59, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as

I was given permission to use the photo by Grandmaster of Abir, Yehoshua Sofer who is in the picture and the owner of the picture. He can be contacted at [email protected]EhavEliyahu (talk) 19:59, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: File does not exist. If the file name in the header contains a typo, feel free to correct the typo and un-close this discussion. AnomieBOT⚡ 01:30, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No evidence permission was granted to release image under the GFDL. See

I was given permission to use the photo by Grandmaster of Abir, Yehoshua Sofer who is in the picture and the owner of the picture. He can be contacted at [email protected]EhavEliyahu (talk) 19:59, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: File does not exist. If the file name in the header contains a typo, feel free to correct the typo and un-close this discussion. AnomieBOT⚡ 01:30, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No evidence permission was granted to release image under the GFDL. See

I was given permission to use the photo by Grandmaster of Abir, Yehoshua Sofer who is in the picture and the owner of the picture. He can be contacted at [email protected]EhavEliyahu (talk) 19:59, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as

I was given permission to use the photo by Grandmaster of Abir, Yehoshua Sofer who is in the picture and the owner of the picture. He can be contacted at [email protected]EhavEliyahu (talk) 19:59, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as

I was given permission to use the photo by Grandmaster of Abir, Yehoshua Sofer who is in the picture and the owner of the picture. He can be contacted at [email protected]EhavEliyahu (talk) 19:59, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as

no evidence of GFDL —Steven G. Johnson (talk) 03:21, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Images used were from a CD I produced as a member of the Phi Beta Sigma Fraternity, Inc. Historical Society. You can contact Mark Pachich Curator of the Sigma Museum at [email protected].

The fact that you "produced" a CD including this image means little or nothing. The owner of the copyright of the image (the only one who can legally give us permission to use it, if it is still in copyright) is generally the original photographer/publisher of the image, not someone who happened to scan it into a CD many years later. —Steven G. Johnson (talk) 03:29, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as

no evidence of GFDL —Steven G. Johnson (talk) 03:22, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Images used were from a CD I produced as a member of the Phi Beta Sigma Fraternity, Inc. Historical Society. You can contact Mark Pachich Curator of the Sigma Museum at [email protected].

The fact that you "produced" a CD including this image means little or nothing. The owner of the copyright of the image (the only one who can legally give us permission to use it, if it is still in copyright) is generally the original photographer/publisher of the image, not someone who happened to scan it into a CD many years later. —Steven G. Johnson (talk) 03:29, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as

no evidence of GFDL —Steven G. Johnson (talk) 03:23, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Images used were from a CD I produced as a member of the Phi Beta Sigma Fraternity, Inc. Historical Society. You can contact Mark Pachich Curator of the Sigma Museum at [email protected].

The fact that you "produced" a CD including this image means little or nothing. The owner of the copyright of the image (the only one who can legally give us permission to use it, if it is still in copyright) is generally the original photographer/publisher of the image, not someone who happened to scan it into a CD many years later. —Steven G. Johnson (talk) 03:29, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as

photo claimed "from personal collection" but seems to be from an old yearbook, with no evidence of GFDL —Steven G. Johnson (talk) 03:25, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Images used were from a CD I produced as a member of the Phi Beta Sigma Fraternity, Inc. Historical Society. You can contact Mark Pachich Curator of the Sigma Museum at [email protected].

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as

photo claimed "from personal collection" but seems to be from an old yearbook, with no evidence of GFDL —Steven G. Johnson (talk) 03:27, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Images used were from a CD I produced as a member of the Phi Beta Sigma Fraternity, Inc. Historical Society. You can contact Mark Pachich Curator of the Sigma Museum at [email protected].

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as

photo claimed "from personal collection" but seems to be from an old yearbook, with no evidence of GFDL —Steven G. Johnson (talk) 03:28, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Images used were from a CD I produced as a member of the Phi Beta Sigma Fraternity, Inc. Historical Society. You can contact Mark Pachich Curator of the Sigma Museum at [email protected].

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as

photo claimed "from personal collection" but seems to be from an old yearbook or similar, with no evidence of GFDL —Steven G. Johnson (talk) 03:29, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Images used were from a CD I produced as a member of the Phi Beta Sigma Fraternity, Inc. Historical Society. You can contact Mark Pachich Curator of the Sigma Museum at [email protected].

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Remember the dot (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:30, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Uploader blanked self-licensing unexplained. Jusjih (talk) 03:30, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Images used were from a CD I produced as a member of the Phi Beta Sigma Fraternity, Inc. Historical Society. You can contact Mark Pachich Curator of the Sigma Museum at [email protected].

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as

photo claimed "from personal collection" but seems to be from an old yearbook or similar, with no evidence of GFDL —Steven G. Johnson (talk) 03:31, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Images used were from a CD I produced as a member of the Phi Beta Sigma Fraternity, Inc. Historical Society. You can contact Mark Pachich Curator of the Sigma Museum at [email protected].

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as

this looks like a professional photo but the uploader claims to have taken it (bkk is short for bangkok, so i think user:jcbkk is jorge c.) thoughts? Calliopejen1 (talk) 03:31, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as

old photo claimed GFDL without evidence —Steven G. Johnson (talk) 03:32, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Images used were from a CD I produced as a member of the Phi Beta Sigma Fraternity, Inc. Historical Society. You can contact Mark Pachich Curator of the Sigma Museum at [email protected].

The fact that you "produced" a CD including this image means little or nothing. The owner of the copyright of the image (the only one who can legally give us permission to use it, if it is still in copyright) is generally the original photographer/publisher of the image, not someone who happened to scan it into a CD many years later. —Steven G. Johnson (talk) 03:29, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Remember the dot (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:30, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No evidence permission was granted to release image under the GFDL. See

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Remember the dot (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:30, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

no source, author listed, nor evidence of GFDL —Steven G. Johnson (talk) 03:34, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as

no evidence of gfdl —Steven G. Johnson (talk) 03:35, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Y Kept as public domain. —Remember the dot ^(talk) 07:44, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as

Questionable GFDL claim. Jusjih (talk) 03:35, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as

Images used were from a CD I produced as a member of the Phi Beta Sigma Fraternity, Inc. Historical Society. You can contact Mark Pachich Curator of the Sigma Museum at [email protected].

The fact that you "produced" a CD including this image means little or nothing. The owner of the copyright of the image (the only one who can legally give us permission to use it, if it is still in copyright) is generally the original photographer/publisher of the image, not someone who happened to scan it into a CD many years later. —Steven G. Johnson (talk) 03:29, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as

no evidence of GFDL —Steven G. Johnson (talk) 03:39, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Images used were from a CD I produced as a member of the Phi Beta Sigma Fraternity, Inc. Historical Society. You can contact Mark Pachich Curator of the Sigma Museum at [email protected].

The fact that you "produced" a CD including this image means little or nothing. The owner of the copyright of the image (the only one who can legally give us permission to use it, if it is still in copyright) is generally the original photographer/publisher of the image, not someone who happened to scan it into a CD many years later. —Steven G. Johnson (talk) 03:29, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as

claimed gfdl without evidence; may be old enough to be public domain, but we would need to know the specific date of the photo and info about the photographer —Steven G. Johnson (talk) 03:41, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as

no source/photographer of photo listed, no evidence of GFDL —Steven G. Johnson (talk) 03:42, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as

Images used were from a CD I produced as a member of the Phi Beta Sigma Fraternity, Inc. Historical Society. You can contact Mark Pachich Curator of the Sigma Museum at [email protected].

The fact that you "produced" a CD including this image means little or nothing. The owner of the copyright of the image (the only one who can legally give us permission to use it, if it is still in copyright) is generally the original photographer/publisher of the image, not someone who happened to scan it into a CD many years later. —Steven G. Johnson (talk) 03:29, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as

Images used were from a CD I produced as a member of the Phi Beta Sigma Fraternity, Inc. Historical Society. You can contact Mark Pachich Curator of the Sigma Museum at [email protected].

The fact that you "produced" a CD including this image means little or nothing. The owner of the copyright of the image (the only one who can legally give us permission to use it, if it is still in copyright) is generally the original photographer/publisher of the image, not someone who happened to scan it into a CD many years later. —Steven G. Johnson (talk) 03:29, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as

I was given permission to use the photo by Grandmaster of Abir, Yehoshua Sofer who is in the picture and the owner of the picture. He can be contacted at [email protected]EhavEliyahu (talk) 19:59, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Personal vague assurances that we can "use" the image are insufficient for Wikipedia. See

WP:COPYREQ. —Steven G. Johnson (talk) 03:27, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as

I was given permission to use the photo by Grandmaster of Abir, Yehoshua Sofer who is in the picture and the owner of the picture. He can be contacted at [email protected]EhavEliyahu (talk) 19:59, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Remember the dot (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:30, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

claimed "self-made" but obviously a photograph of a copyrighted image on a computer screen —Steven G. Johnson (talk) 04:07, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Remember the dot (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:30, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

claimed "self-made" but obviously a photograph of a copyrighted image on a computer screen —Steven G. Johnson (talk) 04:09, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Remember the dot (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:30, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

claimed "self-made" but obviously a photograph of a copyrighted image on a computer screen —Steven G. Johnson (talk) 04:10, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Remember the dot (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 01:30, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

claimed "self-made" but obviously a photograph of a copyrighted image on a computer screen —Steven G. Johnson (talk) 04:11, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Remember the dot (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:30, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

claimed "self-made" but obviously a photograph of a copyrighted image on a computer screen —Steven G. Johnson (talk) 04:17, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Remember the dot (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:30, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

claimed "self-made" but obviously a photograph of a copyrighted image on a computer screen —Steven G. Johnson (talk) 04:18, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Remember the dot (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:30, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

claimed "self-made" but obviously a photograph of a copyrighted image on a computer screen —Steven G. Johnson (talk) 04:21, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as

claimed "self-made" but obviously a photograph of a copyrighted image on a computer screen —Steven G. Johnson (talk) 04:22, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Remember the dot (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:30, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

claimed "self-made" but obviously a photograph of a copyrighted image on a computer screen —Steven G. Johnson (talk) 04:23, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Remember the dot (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:30, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

claimed "self-made" but obviously a photograph of a copyrighted image on a computer screen —Steven G. Johnson (talk) 04:24, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Remember the dot (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:30, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

claimed "self-made" but obviously a photograph of a copyrighted image on a computer screen —Steven G. Johnson (talk) 04:26, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Remember the dot (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:30, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

claimed "self-made" but obviously a photograph of a copyrighted image on a computer screen —Steven G. Johnson (talk) 04:27, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Remember the dot (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:30, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

claimed "self-made" but obviously a photograph of a copyrighted image on a computer screen —Steven G. Johnson (talk) 04:28, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Remember the dot (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:30, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

claimed "self-made" but obviously a photograph of a copyrighted image on a computer screen —Steven G. Johnson (talk) 04:29, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Remember the dot (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:30, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

claimed "self-made" but obviously a photograph of a copyrighted image on a computer screen —Steven G. Johnson (talk) 04:29, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Remember the dot (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:30, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

claimed "self-made" but obviously a photograph of a copyrighted image on a computer screen —Steven G. Johnson (talk) 04:30, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

(On poster's talk page, the user responded "just delete them all") —Steven G. Johnson (talk) 04:32, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Remember the dot (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:30, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

claimed "self-made" but obviously a photograph of a copyrighted image on a computer screen —Steven G. Johnson (talk) 04:32, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Remember the dot (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:30, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

claimed "self-made" but obviously a photograph of a copyrighted image on a computer screen —Steven G. Johnson (talk) 04:34, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Deleted-FASTILY ^(TALK) 22:54, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

claimed "self-made" but obviously photographs of a copyrighted image on a computer screen: Image:Denver Flags.jpg, Image:Bel Air Geckos.jpg, Image:Greensboro Hyeans.jpg, Image:Dover Megaladons.jpg, Image:Honolulu Monkeys.jpg, Image:Kalae Octopuses.jpg, Image:Richmond Panthers.jpg, Image:Houstin Penguins.jpg, Image:Nome Polorbears.jpg, Image:New Port Ps.jpg, Image:Atlanta Sculls.jpg, Image:Las Vegas Spiders.jpg, Image:El Paso Swines.jpg, Image:Maitland Tiburons.jpg —Steven G. Johnson (talk) 04:42, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

In response to my numerous notifications of problematic images on his talk page, the user posted "just delete them all" —Steven G. Johnson (talk) 04:42, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by

claimed PD, but taken from news site and no evidence of PD —Steven G. Johnson (talk) 04:46, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Remember the dot (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:30, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

promo photo, no evidence of PD —Steven G. Johnson (talk) 05:13, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Remember the dot (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:30, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

promo photo, no evidence of GFDL —Steven G. Johnson (talk) 05:14, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Deleted-FASTILY ^(TALK) 22:55, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Image:FMA1 - Private.jpg Image:FMA2 - Corporal.jpg Image:FMAJ - The Furher.jpg Image:FMAI - General.jpg Image:FMAH - Lieutenant General.jpg Image:FMAG - Major General.jpg Image:FMAF - Brigadier General.jpg Image:FMAE - Colonel.jpg Image:FMAD - Lieutenant Colonel.jpg Image:FMAC - Major.jpg Image:FMAB - First Lieutenant.jpg Image:FMAA - Second Lieutenant.jpg Image:FMA5 - Warrant Officer.jpg Image:FMA4 - Sergeant Major.jpg Image:FMA3 - Sergeant.jpg Image:FMA2 - Private.jpg Image:FMA1 - Security Personnel.jpg

PD is claimed, but these insignias are just redrawn original, creative works from the television show.

t 09:12, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

The disgns are very simple so I think they may be uncopyrightable. // Liftarn (talk)

They are no more simple or less unique unique than the average logo, especially since they appear to be complex enough to be identifiable as original artwork from this series.

t 02:50, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Remember the dot (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:30, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Image is taken from a website that the description says has "no copyright statement". This does not mean that it is free and can be licensed as GFDL as it is here. — Poeloq (talk) 13:56, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by

Claims user created, but I dubt that. Liftarn (talk) 15:14, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by

Claims own work, but it looks like a scan of on old drawing. Liftarn (talk) 15:16, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as

Claim own work, but according to the caption in the photo it was taken in ca 1885. Liftarn (talk) 15:19, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Y Kept as public domain. —Remember the dot ^(talk) 07:41, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by

This seems to be a nonfree image. Look to me like it was copied from a website. The author claims that he/she took the picture. нмŵוτнτ 20:17, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Remember the dot (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:30, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

comment's on uploaders talk page suggest they didn't take the pic Genisock2 (talk) 21:41, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Remember the dot (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:30, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

from comments it seems unlieky that author took the original image Genisock2 (talk) 23:04, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by

No proof that this is indeed taken by the uploader; also note that image is orphaned. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 23:19, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.