Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2009 November 4

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete. Shell ^babelfish 02:35, 19 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Buckinghamshire Flag.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• The image is unlikely "self-made" with copyright held by the uploader. It appears to be identical to http://www.theenglandstore.com/shop/html/images/bucks.gif (but saved as JPEG), and copyright is claimed at http://www.englishcountyflags.com/. — Andrwsc (talk · contribs) 17:06, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:03, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Voodoo 1.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• from the image's page:

"Materials on the Canadian Forces Web site were produced and/or compiled by the Department of National Defence for the purpose of providing Canadians with direct access to information about the programs and services offered by the Government of Canada. The material on this site is covered by the provisions of the Copyright Act, by Canadian laws, policies, regulations and international agreements. Such provisions serve to identify the information source and, in specific instances, to prohibit reproduction of materials without written permission. Non-commercial Reproduction Information on this site has been posted with the intent that it be readily available for personal and public non-commercial use and may be reproduced, in part or in whole and by any means, without charge or further permission by the Department of National Defence. We ask only that: ▪ Users exercise due diligence in ensuring the accuracy of the materials reproduced; ▪ The Department of National Defence be identified as the source department; and ▪ The reproduction is not represented as an official version of the materials reproduced, nor as having been made, in affiliation with or with the endorsement of the Department of National Defence." Samuell Lift me up or put me down 03:19, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Again the statement is clear. Why is this in dispute? FWiW Bzuk (talk) 05:44, 4 November 2009 (UTC).[reply]

It doesnt appear to allow non-commercial use so really is not in the public domain perhaps could be used under a fair use criteria if Voodoo images are hard to find. MilborneOne (talk) 12:59, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: The above statement is incompatible with a public domain licence and fair use is unlikely as there are many related images in the commons category Commons:Category:McDonnell F-101 Voodoo. ww2censor (talk) 15:36, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by MBisanz (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:29, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Catoinsi.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• http://www.azgfd.gov/ is an Arizona state agency, not the Federal government. dave pape (talk) 03:26, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with {{
  dfu}} or list it at WP:Non-free content review. Otherwise, unless there is another reason for listing here, the listing will be closed by an administrator and the image kept. AnomieBOT⚡ 21:29, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply
  ]

Actually tagged as both free and non-free. Lacks evidence for the free tag, and rationale for the newly added non-free tag. --dave pape (talk) 22:17, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Another piece of non-free content. We should run a sweep on what number 400,000 will be. Angus McLellan (Talk) 23:45, 14 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:DoDie.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• album cover licensed as CC3.0/self - unlikely uploader is (c) holder or that the cover was released as CC3.0 Skier Dude (talk) 04:02, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Note. The cover is legit, so I've corrected the licensing with {{Non-free album cover}}. — ξ^xplicit 02:41, 18 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with {{
  dfu}} or list it at WP:Non-free content review. Otherwise, unless there is another reason for listing here, the listing will be closed by an administrator and the image kept. AnomieBOT⚡ 04:31, 18 November 2009 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:31, 18 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dividedbynighttour.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• music group's tour ad; no source; if legit, uploader would not be (c) holder, if not, no need for user-created art here Skier Dude (talk) 04:36, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:42, 5 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:A3 sl dble rim newlogo comp.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• sports logo; no source; if legit, uploader wouldn't be (c) holder, if not, no need for user-created art here Skier Dude (talk) 05:10, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:21, 3 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Irsee book cover.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• book cover licensed as PD-self, no link from uploader to authors Skier Dude (talk) 05:39, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:33, 18 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Windows police pro.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• It's unlikely that the uploader is the copyright holder of this software screenshot, which is of a
  rogue antivirus (malware) program.  Sandstein  05:57, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: withdrawn. Licensing has been corrected. — ξ^xplicit 07:40, 6 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:SCTitlePage.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Originally, I tagged the file for lacking a license. An IP editor (presumably the uploader) added the {{PD-self}} tag. Obviously, this is incorrect, but because these sorts of images are not my expertise, I've brought it here for discussion. — ξ^xplicit 06:17, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The image is a scanned image from the 1912 book done by me. The 1912 book is in the public domain. Images of its pages and its text are on the internet. The reference is Samuel Carpenter and his Descendants compiled by Edward Carpenter & his son, Gen. Louis H. Carpenter, published by J. B. Lippincott Co., Philadelphia, Pa., 1912. This book delineates the Philadelphia Carpenters founded by Samuel Carpenter and two of his brothers. See free download of book here. Since this book and its images are in the public domain and the scan of its page by me is released by me into the public domain. At one point, I heard that some one was going to republish this book, and I was concerned of how to list it. I am glad this has come to the attention of those that know better how to list it than I!

What is the best way to list this public domain 1912 image? Jrcrin001 (talk) 06:36, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is clearly {{PD-US}}, as it was published in 1912. IronGargoyle (talk) 07:33, 6 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, IronGargoyle. Consider this withdrawn. — ξ^xplicit 07:40, 6 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:31, 18 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Samboosa3.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Appears to be professionally prepared clipart, not author's own work. I'm not really qualified to say, but it should be investigated. Firespeaker (talk) 06:19, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Not sure if it helps but the image is also at http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2270/2038153915_7ba0be3af0.jpg MilborneOne (talk) 22:20, 17 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. File tagged as non-free. — ξ^xplicit 01:26, 3 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:LogoRed.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• school logo; no source; if legit, uploader would not be (c) holder, if not, no need for user-created art here  Skier Dude  ►  07:23, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with {{
  dfu}} or list it at WP:Non-free content review. Otherwise, unless there is another reason for listing here, the listing will be closed by an administrator and the image kept. AnomieBOT⚡ 06:03, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:31, 18 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Petru Buzgău2.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• There is no evidence that the editor has copyrights on this artwork
  talk) 09:49, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:31, 18 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cristian elbus Buzneanu2.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• uploader has uploaded wors from several artists. There is no evidence they are the copyright holder
  talk) 09:56, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:31, 18 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Delia Brânduşescu2.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Yet another artist's work from this uploader. No evidence of copyrights
  talk) 10:01, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:31, 18 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Nicolae Bikfalvi2.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Another artist's work with no indication of copyrights
  talk) 10:07, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:31, 18 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Francisc Baraniay2.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Another with no correct copyright indication
  talk) 10:11, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:31, 18 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Maria Balea3.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Another artist's work with no evidence of copyright
  talk) 10:15, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:31, 18 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ladislau Babocsic2.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Another artist't work with no indication of copyright
  talk) 10:19, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:31, 18 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Punjabgirl1.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Uploader has a history of passing copyright protected images as his own creation. Check his talkpage for evidence. 59.182.95.53 (talk) 10:19, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:31, 18 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dacian andoni2.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Another artist's work with no evidence of copyright
  talk) 10:23, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:31, 18 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pavel Alaszu2.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Another artist's work with no copyright evidence
  talk) 10:26, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:31, 18 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sit Pecica1.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• this user has uploaded so many dubious files. Also the article
  talk) 11:22, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:31, 18 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sit Pecica2.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

• this user has uploaded so many dubious files. Also the article
  talk) 11:24, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:42, 5 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:FredPatterson head shoulders.gif (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Published 1965, a publicity shot of Children's Aid Society. New York World-Telegram and the Sun Newspaper Photograph Collection, creator and rights status unknown as determined in 1995 by the Library of Congress. That makes this file a copyright orphan file, which cannot be used on Wikipedia, without FUR. —TheDJ (talk • contribs) 13:12, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:31, 18 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bye Bye.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Delete unused, unencyclopaeic image, with a bad source, improper licence, possibly unfree. This uploader had some issues with uploads. ww2censor (talk) 16:46, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Geni (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 21:29, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sergeant Talaiasi Labalaba.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Derivative work of copyrighted artwork; uploader appears to be the creator only of a photograph of the artwork. Stifle (talk) 19:14, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:31, 18 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Stallion 2.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• It seems to be a screen capture. yousaf465' 23:16, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Note that I think it may be necessary to presume copyvio of perhaps all of this uploaders images, in accordance with Wikipedia:Copyright violations. I've deleted many of this contributors already today following a complaint from a copyright holder. Some of them have even been watermarked. He also has claimed copyright over clearly promotional material such as File:Macdonalds Sialkot.jpg (viewable only to admins; it's a flier for McDonalds.) Earlier today, I indefinitely blocked him for such issues. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 23:22, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.