Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2009 November 9

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:33, 14 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pir shaheed.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Clearly scan of published work - no source provided, no way to determine actual (c) status  Skier Dude  ►  00:36, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:33, 14 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Old Rectory School Crest.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

• School logo; no source; if legit, uploader would not be (c) holder, if not, no need for user-created art here  Skier Dude  ►  00:54, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:04, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bendu Appa Rao RMP.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• film poster/promotional image, highly unlikely uploader is (c) holder  Skier Dude  ►  03:54, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:34, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kotha Bangaru Lokam album cover.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• album cover; highly unlikely uploader is (c) holder  Skier Dude  ►  03:56, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:33, 14 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:ARattlers.gif (delete | talk | history | logs).

• sports team logo; no source; if legit, uploader would not be (c) holder, in not, no need for user-created art  Skier Dude  ►  04:32, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. File is now tagged as non-free. — ξ^xplicit 04:53, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:BUMP BUMP.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• album cover; no source; if legit, uploader would not be (c) holder, in not, no need for user-created art  Skier Dude  ►  04:37, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:04, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Boporfeo.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

• publicity poster for opera company; unlikely uploader is (c) holder  Skier Dude  ►  04:43, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:33, 14 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:CJCC.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

• sports/corporate logo; no source; if legit, uploader would not be (c) holder, in not, no need for user-created art  Skier Dude  ►  04:55, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:33, 14 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Castletown Logo poste.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

• OR corporate logo; no source; if legit, uploader would not be (c) holder, in not, no need for user-created art  Skier Dude  ►  04:59, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:04, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cepa logo color.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

• OR corporate logo; no source; if legit, uploader would not be (c) holder, in not, no need for user-created art  Skier Dude  ►  05:00, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:04, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cepa logo color1.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

• OR corporate logo; no source; if legit, uploader would not be (c) holder, in not, no need for user-created art  Skier Dude  ►  05:00, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:33, 14 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:City of Modesto logo.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• civic logo; no source; if legit, uploader would not be (c) holder, in not, no need for user-created art  Skier Dude  ►  05:05, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:33, 14 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Creation regained cover.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• book cover; no source; if legit, uploader would not be (c) holder, in not, no need for user-created art  Skier Dude  ►  05:12, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

not a digitial file-is a scan, so like a photograph... —Preceding unsigned comment added by Trit (talk • contribs) 15:12, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. A photograph of a book cover would still be a copyright violation. (ESkog)^(Talk) 22:00, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:04, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dpklogo.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• OR political group logo; no source; if legit, uploader would not be (c) holder, in not, no need for user-created art  Skier Dude  ►  05:19, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. File is now tagged as non-free. — ξ^xplicit 04:53, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:EVR150-DrunkLikeBibleTimes.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• album cover; no source; if legit, uploader would not be (c) holder, in not, no need for user-created art  Skier Dude  ►  05:22, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:33, 14 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:EastNorthants.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• scholastic logo; no source; if legit, uploader would not be (c) holder, in not, no need for user-created art  Skier Dude  ►  05:22, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:04, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Electronicsdirect2you.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• corporate logo; no source; if legit, uploader would not be (c) holder, in not, no need for user-created art  Skier Dude  ►  05:27, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:33, 14 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Enfield Raider Cropped.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• school logo; no source; if legit, uploader would not be (c) holder, in not, no need for user-created art  Skier Dude  ►  05:28, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 07:33, 14 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Engineering.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• school logo; no source; if legit, uploader would not be (c) holder, in not, no need for user-created art  Skier Dude  ►  05:28, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:33, 14 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Epfa petit1.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• corporate/sports logo; no source; if legit, uploader would not be (c) holder, in not, no need for user-created art  Skier Dude  ►  05:29, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. File is now tagged as non-free. — ξ^xplicit 04:53, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ever underground.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• album cover; no source; if legit, uploader would not be (c) holder, in not, no need for user-created art  Skier Dude  ►  05:33, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:33, 14 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Evu-logo.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• school logo; no source; if legit, uploader would not be (c) holder, in not, no need for user-created art  Skier Dude  ►  05:42, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. File is now tagged as non-free. — ξ^xplicit 04:53, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Flowering spade.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• album cover; no source; if legit, uploader would not be (c) holder, in not, no need for user-created art  Skier Dude  ►  05:46, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:04, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Greeks2.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

• collage of images - no sources provided, bottom right is specifically (c) questionable  Skier Dude  ►  05:52, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:04, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Heavyweight.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• watermarked image - no connection between site & uploader  Skier Dude  ►  05:57, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:04, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Houseboating in the Ozarks Cover.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• book cover; no source; if legit, uploader would not be (c) holder, in not, no need for user-created art  Skier Dude  ►  06:02, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:04, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Incline Dumb-Bell Flyes.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• OR, appears to be scan of printed magazine or poster (note right margin)  Skier Dude  ►  06:07, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:04, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:JNN038-BobDickinson-athumb.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• album cover; no source; if legit, uploader would not be (c) holder, in not, no need for user-created art  Skier Dude  ►  06:08, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:04, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Flat Chest Press.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• OR, appears to be scan of printed magazine or poster (note right margin)  Skier Dude  ►  06:09, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 07:04, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dips.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• OR, appears to be scan of printed magazine or poster (note top right corner)  Skier Dude  ►  06:10, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Initial file upload only kept, other file revisions deleted. Angus McLellan (Talk) 14:16, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:22142189.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• School Logo in corner suggests that this may be part of some promotional image for the school. No reason given to suggest uploader is the copyright holder. FASTILY_sock ^(TALK) 07:24, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment. The two most recent uploads are definitely copyrighted images, but the original image seems fine. Perhaps it's best to just delete the most two recent ones? — ξ^xplicit 04:53, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:22, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Map of Visalia, CA.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Delete: the applied copyright if false. This image is from a copyright US state site so it is not a federal image. ww2censor (talk) 16:27, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with {{
  dfu}} or list it at WP:Non-free content review. Otherwise, unless there is another reason for listing here, the listing will be closed by an administrator and the image kept. AnomieBOT⚡ 07:04, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply
  ]

• Comment the copyright tag has been changed from a false free licence to a non-free tag which requires a fair-use rationale but none was added and the deletion notice was removed. The image still fails
  WP:NFCC because it is a replaceable non-free image and has no fair-use rationale to try and justify it use. ww2censor (talk) 13:40, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by MBisanz (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:57, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Visaliaaerial.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Delete: the applied copyright if false. This image, clearly marked as a 2000 image, is from a copyright website so it is not an image first published before 1923. As a non-free image is would fail
  WP:NFCC#1 because it is replaceable. ww2censor (talk) 16:32, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Keep; file is ineligible for copyright because it is a simple geometric figure. -FASTILY ^(TALK) 03:45, 19 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Scottish National Party Ribbon.svg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• User generated artwork of logo that is registered trade mark. Should be possible to obtain actual copy of logo and use under correctly attributed fair use 71.0.85.190 (talk) 21:20, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The logo was designed by Julian Gibb circa 1967, so presumably also remains under copyright. The user generated one here is, however, a poor copy. It is too narrow in the upper section, and too wide at the bottom compared to that actually used by the Scottish National Party. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.0.85.190 (talk) 01:24, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment. This looks like a {{PD-ineligible}} candidate. — ξ^xplicit 06:15, 14 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:33, 14 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Jaikoz.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Contains copyrighted work (album cover art) and therefore is, at least in part, a derivative work. (ESkog)^(Talk) 21:59, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - No way. Contains two images of copyright album art. Separately, the software screenshot is unlikely to be free.--Blargh29 (talk) 02:35, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.