Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2010 April 8

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:34, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:10 Commandments in Ilocano.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• No freedom of panorama in the Philippines, although I do weakly suggest contacting the uploader to confirm the location of the tablets (probably the Philippines, considering the language photographed, the language he speaks, and the personal information on his user page). Blurpeace 00:25, 8 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep, permission confirmed through OTRS. Blurpeace 05:22, 8 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:1178-06homo09.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Derivative work (a screenshot) of copyrighted content; see description. Blurpeace 01:59, 8 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete copyrighted per above.  fetchcomms☛ 02:44, 8 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Consent sent to OTRS. Wwwhatsup (talk) 03:41, 8 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:33, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:2007 Bear.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Character design is copyrighted and de minimis does not apply as that is the main subject.  fetchcomms☛ 02:42, 8 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, unambiguous violation of copyright; a derivative work. Blurpeace 05:30, 8 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:33, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kinityworldbankspeech.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• This appears to have been scanned from a newspaper or magazine. Eeekster (talk) 04:12, 8 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:34, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Axel Bakunts.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• There are two troublesome things about this file. One, the file description says that it is in the public domain but does not list the source of the image, which makes it hard or impossible to confirm its copyright status. It also says that it is in the public domain because the author died more than 100 years ago, but that is impossible: it is a portrait of a young man who was born in 1899. The image itself could not possibly be more than 90 years old. The justification for deeming this image to be in the public domain needs to be clarified.
  talk) 04:28, 8 April 2010 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 02:33, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Miatsyalhayasdan.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Map scanned from modern copyrighted book, but simultaneously claimed to be PD-old. Seems to be modern, computer-age graphics, therefore very unlikely to be old enough for PD. Fut.Perf. ☼ 10:33, 8 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:33, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tigranes II.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Drawing apparently from a modern (19th or early 20th cent.) print; scanned from a 1990s book. Original artist and publication unknown; may or may not be old enough for PD. Fut.Perf. ☼ 10:39, 8 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 02:33, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Artaxias.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Same situation as the file above. Fut.Perf. ☼ 10:41, 8 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:33, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ciri-ciri ghazal parti.ogg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Appears to be professionally produced; given uploader's other contributions, unlikely this is user-created. (ESkog)^(Talk) 15:31, 8 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:33, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Perbezaan Ghazal Parti dan Ghazal Johor 1.ogg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Same as the above; uploader doesn't seem to understand copyright and this video appears non-user-created. (ESkog)^(Talk) 15:40, 8 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:33, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hj Abdullah Darus.ogg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Aaand one more of the same as the above two. (ESkog)^(Talk) 15:41, 8 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:33, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Vujosevic3.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• The file was uploaded by user blocked due to copyright violation. The user claims that he took this photo using his cell phone, but new cell phones should give images of better quality.  Bojan  Talk  16:34, 8 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete for lack of permission. — ξ^xplicit 00:21, 30 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Childers backpackers fire painting numbered.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• No evidence of permission given for use of this image. This is an artwork of which a photo has been taken and numbers added. The permission stated is that of the photographer of the artwork and not the actual artist Mattinbgn\^talk 20:27, 8 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I am the originator in the UK of this memorial to 15 murdered young people. I have gone on to the web site of the artist and sent a polite email asking about these concerns but have no reply. The photographer (the mother Mary Lewis of the murdered Michael Lewis) was given specific permission by the artist at the memorial event to photograph the picture and use as she thought fit (she and her family travelled from the UK to Australia at their own expense for this). The picture was commissioned by the Australian authorities for its people. The same picture is illustrated in "The Palace -- the story" by Wayne Heidrich

• Comment. I have given the uploader, User:Duncanogi, a week to get OTRS permission in (see here). Feel free to delete after April 28th if permission has not been received. -FASTILY ^(TALK) 04:15, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.