Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2010 February 5

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep. -FASTILY ^(TALK) 18:52, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Chatuchak clocktower.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• unknown country unknown freedom of panorama IngerAlHaosului (talk) 08:57, 5 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep This is in the Chatuchak market in Bangkok, Thailand. Thailand has FOP. Also this is not likely to be a FOP problem even in countries that lack FOP. Calliopejen1 (talk) 14:46, 5 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Agree. Anyway the file was transfered to Commons. Should not have been before this DR was closed (sorry). So suggest that Commonsversion is kept at local file is deleted. --MGA73 (talk) 00:09, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by BorgQueen (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 20:27, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Chelsea Olympiakos CL2008 cropped.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• unfree logo possible tv screenshot IngerAlHaosului (talk) 08:58, 5 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Note: This image is a crop of File:Chelsea Olympiakos CL2008.jpg. --BorgQueen (talk) 09:13, 5 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep does not appear to be a screenshot, logo is de minimis. Calliopejen1 (talk) 15:06, 5 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep. -FASTILY ^(TALK) 18:48, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Chennai airport.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• same freedom of panorama thing as per all the previous IngerAlHaosului (talk) 08:59, 5 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep First of all you need to do more research before your nominations. THe filename says Chennai which is a major Indian city. There is FOP in india so even if this were copyrightable it would not be a problem. But even if there were not FOP there is nothing in this scene that is copyrightable - just some luggage belts. Calliopejen1 (talk) 15:08, 5 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:27, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:ClarkdaleCrop.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• unknown country freedom of panorama status IngerAlHaosului (talk) 09:12, 5 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete File page says photo in use on page Clarkdale, Arizona - pretty good clue that's where the photo is taken. No FOP in US, copyrightable work. Calliopejen1 (talk) 15:10, 5 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Since this is a "Welcome to Clarkdale" sign at the entrance to the town, it's a pretty safe assumption the town (presumably the sign owner) would have no objection to its use here. Maybe relicense as Fair Use? --Pete Tillman (talk) 17:26, 5 February 2010 (UTC) (original uploader)[reply]

Unfortunately, permission for use on wikipedia is not sufficient. Non-free images have to meet the stringent

criteria, which this image doesn't. Calliopejen1 (talk) 13:19, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply

]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep. -FASTILY ^(TALK) 18:48, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Clover Park High School entrance.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• unknown country freedom of panorama status IngerAlHaosului (talk) 09:14, 5 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep country is US if nominator had looked at the image use, so is OK. ww2censor (talk) 15:03, 5 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by MBisanz (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:02, 13 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Coalinga Clock.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• see above freedom of panorama IngerAlHaosului (talk) 09:15, 5 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Neutral From US so no freedom of panorama, but is this clock copyrightable? Maybe. Calliopejen1 (talk) 15:05, 5 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep. -FASTILY ^(TALK) 18:42, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Compton High School billboard.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• billboard not covers by freedom of panorama us IngerAlHaosului (talk) 09:17, 5 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• keep just letters, not copyrightable. Calliopejen1 (talk) 15:05, 5 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:27, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Confucius at Overfelt-cropped.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• unknown freedom of panorama status IngerAlHaosului (talk) 09:18, 5 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete appears to be part of Chinese Cultural Garden at Overfelt Garden in San Jose. No FOP in US, park founded in 1971, no info on copyright notice/renewal/etc. Calliopejen1 (talk) 15:04, 5 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; the work was not published prior to 1923, as the uploader states. For an image to be in the public domain in the US, it must have been published prior to 1923. -FASTILY ^(TALK) 18:41, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Blackpool-GKER.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Not clear that the copyright of this image has expired in the USA; as Wikimedia's servers are in the USA, images must be free to use there. Stifle (talk) 11:33, 5 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Although published anonymously in 1938, and thus in the public domain in the EU, the photograph itself predates 1923 as the locomotive does not bear the mark of the successor company (the London Midland and Scottish Railway {LMS}: in whose magazine it was reproduced) on the sides of the tank nor the LMS number refered to in the caption. The LMSR was formed on 1 January 1923. Additional US tag to be applied. Regards Oxonhutch (talk) 10:03, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:27, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dr. Mohammad Khatami.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:27, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:IranianRial.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:27, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hashemi.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:27, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Khamenei 2.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:27, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rajaei.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:27, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mir-Hossein Mousavi Khameneh.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• I'm sure the files are tagged wrong, Amir.Hossein.7055 (talk · contribs) tags all of them as a {{PD-Self}} file and there is nothing proofs that. Using Such pictures is against Iran Copyright law. The uploader did the same at fa.wiki and his files were deleted. Amirreza ^talk 15:41, 5 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:27, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Squeaki Britto by Romero Britto.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• This is a photo of a work of art. No FOP in the US. So I think we need a permission from the artist to keep this image. MGA73 (talk) 19:20, 5 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:27, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:FruitStripe wiki.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• No disputing it's a user photo - but contains product artwork in top of frame. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:10, 5 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I believe that this is simple enough packaging to not pass the threshold of originality (e.g. Ets-Hokin_v._Skyy_Spirits_Inc)..."Skyy argues, in a nutshell, that the commercial photographs of its vodka bottle are not worthy of copyright protection. We disagree. The essence of copyrightability is originality of artistic, creative expression. Given the low threshold for originality under the Copyright Act, as well as the longstanding and consistent body of case law holding that photographs generally satisfy this minimal standard, we conclude that Ets-Hokin's product shots of the Skyy vodka bottle are original works of authorship entitled to copyright protection."

I am not a commercial photograhper, and the photo in question has been released into the Public Domain by myself. <

I don't understand why we can't take a photograph of an item in full public display..like these photos that include logos, names and designs:

If we photograph a field of patented wheat, or a car on the highway with "Chevrolet" visible or a copyrighted 'designer' breed dog on the sidewalk, that is illegal??????

xBitterSweetHorror (talk) 18:44, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:27, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bobs wiki.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Logo - No visible indication uploader is 'owner' of the logo rights Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:14, 5 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I believe that this is simple enough packaging to not pass the threshold of originality (e.g. Ets-Hokin_v._Skyy_Spirits_Inc)..."Skyy argues, in a nutshell, that the commercial photographs of its vodka bottle are not worthy of copyright protection. We disagree. The essence of copyrightability is originality of artistic, creative expression. Given the low threshold for originality under the Copyright Act, as well as the longstanding and consistent body of case law holding that photographs generally satisfy this minimal standard, we conclude that Ets-Hokin's product shots of the Skyy vodka bottle are original works of authorship entitled to copyright protection."

I am not a commercial photograhper, and the photo in question has been released into the Public Domain by myself.

I don't understand why we can't take a photograph of an item in full public display..like these photos that include logos, names and designs:

If we photograph a field of patented wheat, or a car on the highway with "Chevrolet" visible or a copyrighted 'designer' breed dog on the sidewalk, that is illegal??????

I feel that its use is covered by the U.S. fair use laws because:

1. It is being used for informational purposes only;

2. It is the logo of a company for which no equivalent free alternative exists or could be created without infringing on copyright;

3. It does not infringe upon the original copyright holder's ability to profit from the media; and

4. It contributes significantly to the article in which it is used by identifying its subject.

xBitterSweetHorror (talk) 18:43, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:27, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:FruitStripes wiki.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Product artwork - Unlikely uploader owns rights to design Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:15, 5 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I believe that this is simple enough packaging to not pass the threshold of originality (e.g. Ets-Hokin_v._Skyy_Spirits_Inc)..."Skyy argues, in a nutshell, that the commercial photographs of its vodka bottle are not worthy of copyright protection. We disagree. The essence of copyrightability is originality of artistic, creative expression. Given the low threshold for originality under the Copyright Act, as well as the longstanding and consistent body of case law holding that photographs generally satisfy this minimal standard, we conclude that Ets-Hokin's product shots of the Skyy vodka bottle are original works of authorship entitled to copyright protection."

I am not a commercial photograhper, and the photo in question has been released into the Public Domain by myself.

I don't understand why we can't take a photograph of an item in full public display..like these photos that include logos, names and designs:

If we photograph a field of patented wheat, or a car on the highway with "Chevrolet" visible or a copyrighted 'designer' breed dog on the sidewalk, that is illegal??????

xBitterSweetHorror (talk) 18:43, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:27, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Marksworkwarehouse37.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Logo - But Canadian so is FOP applicable? Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:21, 5 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:27, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hulya Avsar.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• 3 tineye matches - But all at much reduced res Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:39, 5 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:27, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rolex 55 Car.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Advertising Artwork - FOP Applicable? Sfan00 IMG (talk) 22:08, 5 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Caribbean H.Q. (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 13:23, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:The Sheik.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Image watermark suggests possible source ... Which is not nessacrily the uploader Sfan00 IMG (talk) 22:13, 5 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:27, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Panajot pano.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Likely copyvio from a commercial press photo. Currently shown in Google image search cache as having been in use on 24-ore.com, a commercial Albanian news site [4], although the image link now gives a 404 error there. Was uploaded here as "copyrighted, no rights reserved", pointing to an earlier upload on sq-wiki as its only source (sq:Skeda:Panajot pano.jpg). Copyright abuse on sq-wiki is notoriously common; for instance, the same original sq-wiki user also uploaded sq:Skeda:James Stewart.jpg with the same "norightsreserved" claim, all lacking source and authorship attribution. Thus almost certainly a copyvio; should in fact have been speedied under F9. Fut.Perf. ☼ 22:28, 5 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:27, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Evile2010.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• No evidence of ownership, uploader seems to have a history of uploading non-free images as free. Rehevkor ✉ 22:43, 5 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:27, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:FearFactory 2010 Tour poster.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• No evidence of ownership of image seemingly uploaded for promotional reasons. Unlikely to be owner regardless. Rehevkor ✉ 22:49, 5 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:27, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wildhearts 2009 Tour poster.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Poster used for promotional purposes with no evidence of ownership, as above. Rehevkor ✉ 22:51, 5 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:27, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Porcupine Tree Tour Poster.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Poster used for promotional purposes with no evidence of ownership, as above. Rehevkor ✉ 22:52, 5 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:27, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:NapalmDeath Tour 2010.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Poster used for promotional purposes with no evidence of ownership, as above. Rehevkor ✉ 22:53, 5 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.