Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2010 June 26

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:51, 10 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Flash player crash- firefox 3.6.4.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Proprietary OS, firefox has a custom skin, youtube is not free to use. Samuell Lift me up or put me down 01:17, 26 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:51, 10 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bartonmalowlogo.gif (delete | talk | history | logs).

• It is unlikely that the company released their logo under GFDL. Eeekster (talk) 07:26, 26 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 01:51, 10 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ramush Haradinaj.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Lacks licensing information, low resolution and author's talk page with tons of now deleted files suggest that uploaderis not the author of the photo. Blacklake (talk) 11:53, 26 June 2010 (UTC) Blacklake (talk) 11:53, 26 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:51, 10 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:AlbanianPartisans.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Taken from a forum, has not fallen into PD yet. Blacklake (talk) 11:56, 26 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:51, 10 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Police HQ.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• This seems as an invalid fair use claim to me. This location can easily be photographed by a person, there is no reason to use a non-free photograph. —TheDJ (talk • contribs) 13:34, 26 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. I agree (does not have to be easy - just possible). Also I see no "logo" (used as a reason why it is not replacable). --MGA73 (talk) 19:57, 26 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:51, 10 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright Violation from serbian football association: http://www.reprezentacija.rs/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1253&Itemid=12 --92.106.83.96 (talk) 15:05, 26 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:51, 10 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:La Tecolota.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Author is Misael Diaz and source is panoramio.com but there is no link so we can verify license or permission. License PD-self seems to be wrong since uploader is not copyright holder. MGA73 (talk) 19:35, 26 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:51, 10 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:San Jeronimo Dam 2.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Author is Misael Diaz and source is panoramio.com but there is no link so we can verify license or permission. License PD-self seems to be wrong since uploader is not copyright holder. MGA73 (talk) 20:19, 26 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Wrong forum. The file is on Commons, please nominate it for deletion there if you feel it is non-free. AnomieBOT⚡ 22:56, 26 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A screenshoot using a nonfree operating system ( windows Vista ) , while VLC is free softftware and crossplatform . This photo can be taken easily on Linux .Melnakeeb (talk) 22:14, 26 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:51, 10 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Zero in on.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Delete: the uploader claims this to be a PD image butthis page on MySpace clearly shows the image is attributed to a person named "Alex Solca" and there is no evidence of permission from him nor is there any suggestion that the photographer and the uploader SillyLorenzo might even be the same person. ww2censor (talk) 22:22, 26 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.