Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2011 February 22

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:10, 8 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mirandawarningadvertising.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Advertisement central to the photo is creative and nonfree. United States does not have freedom of panorama (except for architectural works, which the billboard is not). RJaguar3 | u | t 03:18, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: no consensus. SchuminWeb (Talk) 00:11, 9 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:ChateauLatour03.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• The file shows a wine bottle and the label on it. On the label there is a drawing of a castle. That makes the photo a derivative work. Many files have been deleted on Commons with this rationale. The question is now if the drawing is eligible for copyright and if it could be de minimis. Personally I doubt we could call it PD-ineligible or if it is deminimis since the photo would loose its value if we remove the lable and/or the drawing. It may however be PD because of age. Anyone know how old it is? MGA73 (talk) 20:28, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I just got at tip to check this - this could be used as a argument to keep. --MGA73 (talk) 20:32, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

In that case, the court ruled that the bottle was not copyrightable because the label of the bottle contained only textual elements, but this bottle has a copyrightable logo on it. --

talk) 02:01, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply

]

You are wrong. The court said exactly the opposite. The court explicitly states:

"We need not, however, decide whether the label is copyrightable because Ets-Hokin's product shots are based on the bottle as a whole, not on the label. The whole point of the shots was to capture the bottle in its entirety. The defendants have cited no case holding that a bottle of this nature may be copyrightable, and we are aware of none. [...] Because Ets-Hokin's product shots are shots of the bottle as a whole--a useful article not subject to copyright protection--and not shots merely, or even mainly, of its label, we hold that the bottle does not qualify as a "preexisting work" within the meaning of the Copyright Act. As such, the photos Ets-Hokin took of the bottle cannot be derivative works."

Actually, that is precisely one of the main points of the ruling and why it is interesting. As long as the object of the photo is to capture not merely the label but the whole bottle, then it does not matter if something on the label is copyrighted or not. Or, to use our jargon, as long as the object of the photo is not merely the label but the whole bottle, then the label is de minimis, accessory.

-- Asclepias (talk) 15:17, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SchuminWeb (Talk) 06:51, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply

]

• Admin comment: I have relisted this in the hopes of getting more discussion based around the court case now that text has been quoted from the case. In evaluating this discussion for closing, I was unable to rectify the court case vs. this image, since the only thing that distinguishes this wine bottle from another brand would appear to be the label. SchuminWeb (Talk) 06:51, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by VernoWhitney (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 16:09, 1 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:RajaKiAayegiBaraatSTARPLUStvserialRKAB.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• I doubt that the uploader is the copyright holder. OTRS ticket required. Leyo 14:55, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by VernoWhitney (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 16:09, 1 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Star Parivaar Awards 2010 StarPlusChannel promotionallogo.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• I doubt that the uploader is the copyright holder. OTRS ticket required. Leyo 14:56, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by VernoWhitney (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 16:09, 1 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sapnon Se Bhare Naina STARPLUS TVSERIAL.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• I doubt that the uploader is the copyright holder. OTRS ticket required. Leyo 14:57, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by VernoWhitney (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 16:09, 1 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Star Parivaar Awards 2010 STARPLUSchannel.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• I doubt that the uploader is the copyright holder. OTRS ticket required. Leyo 14:58, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:10, 9 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:RubinJoseStathamASBtenniscentreAUCKLAND,NEWZEALANDRjS.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• I doubt that the uploader is the copyright holder. OTRS ticket required. Leyo 14:59, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by VernoWhitney (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 16:09, 1 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:BeheneinSTARPLUStvserialBeheneinsisters.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• I doubt that the uploader is the copyright holder. OTRS ticket required. Leyo 14:59, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by VernoWhitney (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 16:09, 1 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:SabkiLaadlibeboTVSERIALSTARPLUS.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• I doubt that the uploader is the copyright holder. OTRS ticket required. Leyo 15:00, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by VernoWhitney (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 16:09, 1 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:MannKeeAwaazPratigyaSTARPLUSpromotionlogodfrgtse56e5t5t4645645ggg.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• I doubt that the uploader is the copyright holder. OTRS ticket required. Leyo 15:00, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by VernoWhitney (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 16:09, 1 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:HamariDevraniSTARPLUSNewPromotionalimagebablaetc12424v542.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• I doubt that the uploader is the copyright holder. OTRS ticket required. Leyo 15:01, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by VernoWhitney (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 18:11, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:AARTHI AGARWAL.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Unlikely the uploader has any rights to this file. SchmuckyTheCat (talk) 22:52, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with {{
  dfu}} or list it at WP:Non-free content review. Otherwise, unless there is another reason for listing here, the listing will be closed by an administrator and the image kept. AnomieBOT⚡ 16:09, 1 March 2011 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.