Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2011 January 10

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:17, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wanderers.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• OR; FC logo; no indication at source that it was released as PD Skier Dude (talk) 03:46, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:17, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cafatupmain.gif (delete | talk | history | logs).

• school logo; no source; unlikely uploader is (c) holder Skier Dude (talk) 04:05, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:17, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Justine Greening.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• No free or fair use rationale here or at the source. Rrius (talk) 05:40, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:17, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Henry Smith MP.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• No free or fair use rationale, and source says "all rights reserved". Rrius (talk) 05:42, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:17, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Jonathan Djanogly.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• No free or fair use rationale; source say "all rights reserved". Rrius (talk) 05:44, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:17, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Theresa Villiers.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• No free or fair use rationale here or at source. Rrius (talk) 05:45, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:17, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Owen Paterson.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• No free or fair use rationale; source says "all rights reserved". Rrius (talk) 05:47, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:17, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mary Macleod.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• No free or fair use rationale; source says "all rights reserved". Rrius (talk) 05:48, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:17, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Modern bushmen.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Photo source labels this photo as "(C) All Rights Reserved": http://www.flickr.com/photos/charlesfred/74211953/in/set-1635004/ 80.163.68.22 (talk) 08:05, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:17, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Books city by gia bugadze.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• I am not an expert, but wouldn't the copyright belong to the artist? I see no mention of the artist releasing his rights. Muhandes (talk) 08:38, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: per nom. This uploader appears to be unreliable and makes data changes depending on how their images are tagged. File is a derivative image of a 2D artwork without any evidence of permission. File:Gia Bugadze books.jpg may have been a previously deleted version of the same image under a different name but not being an admin I can't check it. ww2censor (talk) 06:06, 16 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:17, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:JohnCanzano.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Appears to be a simple cut and paste from the website of The Oregonian, where Canzano is employed. See http://www.oregonlive.com/images/oregonian/158/john-canzano.jpg Big Smooth 17:42, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:17, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Multiple sclerosis pic.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Yes website says it is free but file says ADAM in the bottom and it looks like images from ADAM is something you have to pay for - check http://www.adamimages.com/ MGA73 (talk) 21:26, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• A tin-eye search shows it's used on multiple sites, but the original clearly belongs to "A.D.A.M., Inc." as the watermark indicates. The terms and conditions of A.D.A.M. indicate that "the content accessible within the Website (the "Content") is the proprietary information of the Company and its content providers, and the Company and its content providers retain all right, title, and interest in the Content." So it's possible that the image is actually copyright, and the Life in spite of MS website is mistaken in claiming it's copyright-free. It certainly deserves further investigation to clarify the issue. --RexxS (talk) 22:42, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • This is the image. It looks copyright, unfortunately. --RexxS (talk) 22:49, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Thank you detectives. The source website of this image and many other images states very explicitly that "image is copyright free". If you guys wish to have it deleted, go ahead, I don't much care; but you are depriving the project of a useful image so that you can look important and have something to do.WildHorsesPulled (talk) 19:31, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright is important. I can not take a car just because I like it and Wikipedia can not just take the work of others just because we like it. We do not blame you for uploading the file because you took it from a source that told you it was free. But when we find out it is not free we should delete it. --MGA73 (talk) 22:37, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.