Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2011 January 23

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 6 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:BritPSYOPS.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

• when was this logo designed? no evidence supplied that would make this PD Calliopejen1 (talk) 01:50, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. Consensus here shows that the original uploader created the image. — ξ^xplicit 00:16, 6 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:NationalHighways.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Original image, upon which the current image is based, had no source. Kelly ^hi! 03:38, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Because it was hand drawn? See User_talk:Robert_Merkel/archive_3#Hume_highway_maps.... He hasn't edited since 2007, so I doubt we'll get any more info. The-Pope (talk) 08:35, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep The original was uploaded in 2004 by Fikri (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) who hasn't been active since 2007. A lot of images made by editors back then rarely ever had a source, Mark (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) made further improvements later on. Bidgee (talk) 01:37, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep made by Fikri (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) in 2004, this nomination should be combined with the other nominations of maps by Fikri Gnangarra 02:31, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep I'm sufficiently convinced that Fikri made the maps himself, and therefore had the capacity to release copyright on them, which he did. Orderinchaos 07:48, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. Consensus here shows that the original uploader created the image. — ξ^xplicit 00:16, 6 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:SESouthAutraliaHighways.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Original image (on which the current image is based) had no source. Kelly ^hi! 03:50, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • This is silly. Fikri licensed the original as GFDL but didn't explicitly say "I made it." User:Fikri/Maps suffices to establish that he did indeed make it, and therefore the current image is a legitimate derivative. Hesperian 08:48, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep The original was uploaded in 2004 by Fikri (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) who hasn't been active since 2007. A lot of images made by editors back then rarely ever had a source, Mark (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) made further improvements later on. Bidgee (talk) 01:38, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep made by Fikri (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) in 2004, this nomination should be combined with the other nominations of maps by Fikri especially as another nomination has verifiable information about the making of the maps Gnangarra 02:32, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep I'm sufficiently convinced that Fikri made the maps himself, and therefore had the capacity to release copyright on them, which he did. Orderinchaos 07:48, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. Consensus here shows that the original uploader created the image. — ξ^xplicit 00:16, 6 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:WAHighways.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Original image, on which the current image is based, had no source. Kelly ^hi! 03:52, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • This is silly. Fikri licensed the original as GFDL but didn't explicitly say "I made it." User:Fikri/Maps suffices to establish that he did indeed make it, and therefore the current image is a legitimate derivative. Hesperian 08:48, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep The original was uploaded in 2004 by
  Orderinchaos (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) made further improvements later on. Bidgee (talk) 01:39, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Keep made by Fikri (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) in 2004, this nomination should be combined with the other nominations of maps by Fikri especially as another nomination has verifiable information about the making of the maps Gnangarra 02:32, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep I'm sufficiently convinced that Fikri made the maps himself, and therefore had the capacity to release copyright on them, which he did. Orderinchaos 07:48, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. File licensed under fair use. — ξ^xplicit 00:16, 6 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:CityofJoy.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• book cover, no source, doubtful uploader is Dominique Lapierre or the publishing compnay Skier Dude (talk) 04:54, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Included non free book cover tag to the image, the image is a scanned book cover taken by the uploader Ankur Mehrotra —Preceding undated comment added 05:39, 24 January 2011 (UTC).[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 6 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ecomobility preview.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• As an organisational logo this should be listed under fair use (and in which case it should be significantly smaller than 1120x468 pixels). If the contributor is part of the organisation concerned, which the username implies, then it surely OTRS permission would be appropriate. As it stands I don't believe that this individual has the authority to release an organisation's logo under the CC-BY-SA-3.0 licence. To be clear, the organisation's website asserts copyright of content and does not explicitly release any information under a CC licence.
  Talk) 08:41, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 6 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:FortOntario.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• © 2011 New York State Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation. All rights reserved. Magog the Ogre (talk) 09:17, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 6 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mergelyan.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• We have no details of the author or the publication of this image, meaning the PD status is impossible to verify. J Milburn (talk) 11:07, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 6 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Istiophorus platypterus.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• see commons:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Istiophorus platypterus 2.jpg Magog the Ogre (talk) 17:31, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: File does not exist. If the file name in the header contains a typo, feel free to correct the typo and un-close this discussion. AnomieBOT⚡ 05:03, 6 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:P56721-Moscow-Maya Plisetskaya.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• see commons:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Maya Plisetskaya.jpg Magog the Ogre (talk) 18:27, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 6 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Amyt Datta.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• The blog makes no claims about the image being licensed under a Creative Commons license. Logan _Talk ^{Contributions} 19:30, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 6 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Fullcolorultimate.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• This toy is most likely copyrighted. MGA73 (talk) 19:44, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 6 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tito maneuvers "Sloboda 71".jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• see commons:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Tito maneuvers Sloboda 71.jpg Magog the Ogre (talk) 19:48, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 6 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hitzpronger.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• This toy or figure is probably copyrighted and is a derivative work. MGA73 (talk) 19:52, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 6 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:TCskydiveToDanger.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

• The toy is probably copyrighted and that makes the photo a derivative work. File is unused. MGA73 (talk) 20:23, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 6 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:McFarlaneVintage.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• The toy is probably copyrighted and that makes the photo a derivative work. MGA73 (talk) 20:32, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 6 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:KeldorToy.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• As the text say this is a copyrighted toy. MGA73 (talk) 20:52, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. File licensed under fair use. — ξ^xplicit 00:16, 6 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Trout.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

• see commons:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Cco logo small.png; fair use may apply. Magog the Ogre (talk) 21:17, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 6 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:DADiSPSceenshot.PNG (delete | talk | history | logs).

• This is a screenshot of copyrighted software. Logan _Talk ^{Contributions} 21:36, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.