Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2011 October 14

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:03, 1 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wardle High logo.svg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Copyright violation: School logo. Sreejith K (talk) 05:13, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 28 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:65 foundation 72 600.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Non-free painting Sreejith K (talk) 08:08, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 28 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ahsubdv3.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Non-free artwork Sreejith K (talk) 08:08, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 28 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:AhuraMazda2.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Looks like a non-free logo, but not information on the page to identify it. The image is unused as well. Sreejith K (talk) 13:40, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 28 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:AIAFF.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Unused Non-free poster. Wrong license. Unused. Sreejith K (talk) 13:41, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:03, 1 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Processedmeat.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• No evidence uploader is copyright holder. Kelly ^hi! 14:18, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 09:07, 16 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Karin Michaelis (1872-1950)- Portraitfotografie in ihren Lebenserinnerungen 'Der kleine Kobold'.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Not known, when the picture is created. To say, that the photographer died before 1911 has no source (photographer unknown). User has uploaded many copyvios on de.wp and commons. Quedel (talk) 18:54, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep - {{

File:Wilhelm Frankl -Titelbild - Das Illustrierte Blatt - 122 Kriegsnummer, November 1916.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

• No photographer named. Newspaper are from 1916 when I looked right upper. Newspaper from World War I. So license template "author died 100 years ago" not possible. Quedel (talk) 18:56, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep - {{

File:Badener Salon 1895, jährliche Kunstausstellung im Konversationshaus Baden-Baden.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

• No source given, that the photographer (like the template says) died befor 1911. No evidence given, that the photograph is in the PD for his age. Quedel (talk) 18:58, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep - {{

File:Internationales Taunus Automobil Rennen um den Kaiserpreis 14.Juni 1907.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Postcard from 1907. No source given, why the unnamed copyrightholer died before 1911. No evidence of PD. Quedel (talk) 18:59, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 09:07, 16 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Edith Andreae, born 'Rathenau' (1883-1952).JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

• No evidence given, that the photographer died before 1911. When I looked at the picture, the date of photograph could be after 1911. No author given. User has upload much of unfree media on de.wp and commons. Quedel (talk) 19:06, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 09:07, 16 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bertha von Arnswald 1850 -1919, mother of Fritz Andreae (1873–1950), .JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

• No author named, why should he/she died befor 1911 as the uploader say via license-template? The picture could be taken after 1911. So, non-free (as of many of the uploads from this user on de.wp and commons) Quedel (talk) 19:08, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with {{
  dfu}} or list it at WP:Non-free content review. AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 28 October 2011 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 09:07, 16 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hanna Mathilde von Rothschild 1832-1924.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Photographer should died before 1911 as the uploader say - but no author is named (unknown?). The picture could be taken after 1911. Fair-Use not possible: no low resolution (17,8 MP!), not saying if there are some replaceable media. Quedel (talk) 19:11, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with {{
  dfu}} or list it at WP:Non-free content review. AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 28 October 2011 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. No prejudice to recreation/undeletion if it can be shown that this postcard is pre-1923, pre-1964 and not renewed, or pre-1978/89 without a copyright mark. Magog the Ogre (talk) 06:11, 1 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Black family subsistence fishing.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• No information on source, copyright holder, or publication place/date. Kelly ^hi! 20:13, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • The original upload information states, "Postcard of a southern, black family on a fishing and hunting outing in late 1800s". --JN466 01:09, 15 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    • Yes, but this information gives us no idea when the photo was published or who the copyright holder is. There's not even any way to verify the photo was, in fact, taken when claimed. Kelly ^hi! 01:15, 15 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
      • I realised after I first posted that we don't know when the photographer died, and whether the required 70 or 100 years have passed since their death to make it PD. I ran a tineye search, but could find no matches online. The problem with old postcards like that, at least if scanned from an original, is that we may never know who took the photo. It's a valuable image, and I'll be sad to see it go. --JN466 01:44, 15 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
      • If the postcard was uploaded before 1923, it's in public domain, any source on the date? Secret ^account 19:50, 15 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
        • You mean if it was printed before 1923? I would assume that's a given, from the info provided. I've dropped Deeceevoice a mail; but she hardly contributes any more of late. --JN466 02:08, 16 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 09:07, 16 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Johnny Cakes food.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Includes copyrighted product packaging. Kelly ^hi! 23:17, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This usage is for non-profit research purposes, complements the advertising branding purpose, is low resolution and is beneficial to the value of any copyright...therefore it seems to be fair use under "17 U.S.C. § 107for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright. In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is a fair use the factors to be considered shall include: 1) the purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of a commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes; 2) the nature of the copyrighted work; 3) the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole; and 4) the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work.Swampyank (talk) 23:41, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If the image is claimed under fair use, you'll need to include a non-free license template and a non-free use rationale. Kelly ^hi! 01:16, 15 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

There is no legitimate reason to include the box of corn starch in the image.

Wha? 11:10, 6 November 2011 (UTC)[reply

]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.