Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2012 February 15

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Candia overall AT 6.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

• I think the problem is the word "restored"... Did the restoration result in a new copyright?
  Stefan2 (talk) 00:38, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tane Mahuta sign.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Stefan2 (talk) 01:10, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply
  ]
  • Does COM:FOP#New Zealand state that the law re photos of signs is similar, or does it not state that? Do we really act on "suggests"? Moriori (talk) 03:04, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Subicmoney.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Coins are not 2D items, so the licence is wrong. See
  Stefan2 (talk) 01:12, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply
  ]
  • I could simply replace the photograph with an image used originally in 1866. (from http://hrcak.srce.hr/file/110727 , EGGER) The current image is seemingly from 1976. Is that ok?
    Er-vet-en (say) 09:55, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply
    ]
    • If the older image was published in 1866, that image can be used. I can't read the text in the link, so I can't check whether the image is OK. --
      Stefan2 (talk) 12:41, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply
      ]
      • The year is right below the image in that file. (page 3) Regards.
        Er-vet-en (say) 18:03, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply
        ]
        • I would assume that "EGGER 1866" means that it was published in 1866. In that case, the other image can be used, but this one is still unfree. --
          Stefan2 (talk) 00:04, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply
          ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:MIR SAYYID HAYDAR AMOLI(AMULI).jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Dubious own work. Lots of notices about speedy deletions on the uploader's talk page.
  Stefan2 (talk) 01:22, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Fakhr razi tabarestani.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Is this a statue or a painting? If it is a painting, own work sounds unlikely.
  Stefan2 (talk) 01:23, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Josh Samuels Match Attax.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

• See
  Stefan2 (talk) 01:24, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as

]

File:Josh Cola.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

• See
  Stefan2 (talk) 01:25, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Now tagged speedy G4  Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 23:40, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Imboden movement.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Is this really 100% own work and not based on some previous map?
  Stefan2 (talk) 01:28, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply
  ]

Question is moot. Please remove this file from the Wikipedia database.

However, discussion of Imboden_movement2 applies to Imboden_movement. (see below) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Donaldecoho (talk • contribs)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as

]

File:Imboden movement2.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Is this really 100% own work and not based on some previous map?
  Stefan2 (talk) 01:28, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply
  ]

Of course it's based on some previous map, a free Wikipedia file: File:Juniatamap.png
File:Imboden_movement2.png

As I've added to Stefan2's talk page, the underlying map of the Juniata River watershed is by Karl Musser. He permits adaptation and requests attribution as I have added to the caption at

. To his original work I have added the cities of Gettysburg, Chambersburg, Mercersberg, McConnelsburg, Cumberland MD, Hanover MD, Bloody Run (Everett), the movement arrows for Imboden's cavalry, the position of Milroy at Bloody Run (blue circle), and the orange dots for Higgins' makeshift forts. I have also added the 'conflict' explosions around McConnelsburg and Gettysburg. All of this was done with MSWord shapes and text boxes.

Issues related to unclear attribution to Karl Musser have been clarified at File:Imboden movement2.png. Additionally, the topic this file addresses is sufficiently esoteric that the probability of someone further adapting Imboden_movement2.png is virtually 0. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Donaldecoho (talk • contribs)

I see. So the map was really unfree (no attribution and wrong licence). However, since it is free now (your changes were listed as CC-Zero before you added the attribution which is compatible with the original CC-BY-SA 2.5), I have moved it over to Commons. --

Stefan2 (talk) 00:23, 16 February 2012 (UTC)[reply

]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Nortus.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• The design of the logo clearly exhibits originality; it is thus eligible for copyright and not in the public domain. ZZArch ^{talk to me} 03:49, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Saif in 2011.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• From the exif data this appears to be scanned from a printed source. Eeekster (talk) 05:33, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: The file was moved from File:Saif in 2011.jpg to File:Saif Ali Khan.jpg by AlexCovarrubias (talk · contribs) at 05:49, 15 February 2012 (UTC). AnomieBOT⚡ 07:05, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Jewels 1.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Apparently scanned from The Royal Jewelry Museum,
  ISBN 977-305-350-4, and hence a copyright violation. He to Hecuba (talk) 10:37, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply
  ]
  • Also nominating the following files with the same problems:
• Image:Jewels 17.JPG
• Image:Jewel 18.JPG
• Image:Jewel 19.JPG
• Image:Jewel 20.JPG
• Image:Jewel 21.JPG
• Image:Jewel 42.JPG
• Image:Jewels 43.JPG
• Image:Jewels 58.JPG
• Image:Jewel 30.JPG
• Image:Jewel 41.JPG
• Image:Jewels 16.JPG
• Image:Museum of jewels outside view.JPG
• Image:Museum of jewels Stairs.JPG
• Image:Interior museum of jewels.JPG
• Image:Walls of museum.JPG
• Image:Royal family.JPG
• Image:Muhammad Ali.JPG
• Image:King farouk.JPG

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Parallel hexbus interface.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

• The summary reads "Peter Engels" but
  Stefan2 (talk) 10:40, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as

]

File:BCGSlogo.jpeg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Dubious own work.
  Stefan2 (talk) 13:00, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Piratepakjr.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Unused personal photo with a copyrighted ship which is hardly de minimis.
  Stefan2 (talk) 15:01, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ehrlinger, Erich.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Not properly sourced: the page doesn't confirm that the photographer is anonymous and there is no date of publication, so there is no way to confirm that it is out of copyright in the European Union. Furthermore, the {{
  Stefan2 (talk) 15:13, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bierkamp, Walter.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Not properly sourced: the page doesn't confirm that the photographer is anonymous and there is no date of publication, so there is no way to confirm that it is out of copyright in the European Union. Furthermore, the {{
  Stefan2 (talk) 15:21, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dubois, Werner 2.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Not properly sourced: the page doesn't confirm that the photographer is anonymous and there is no date of publication, so there is no way to confirm that it is out of copyright in the European Union. Furthermore, the {{
  Stefan2 (talk) 15:27, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Schütt, Hans-Heinz.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Not properly sourced: the page doesn't confirm that the photographer is anonymous and there is no date of publication, so there is no way to confirm that it is out of copyright in the European Union. Furthermore, the {{
  Stefan2 (talk) 15:28, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Unverhau, Heinrich.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Not properly sourced: the page doesn't confirm that the photographer is anonymous and there is no date of publication, so there is no way to confirm that it is out of copyright in the European Union. Furthermore, the {{
  Stefan2 (talk) 15:32, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Jührs, Robert.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Not properly sourced: the page doesn't confirm that the photographer is anonymous and there is no date of publication, so there is no way to confirm that it is out of copyright in the European Union. Furthermore, the {{
  Stefan2 (talk) 15:33, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Juhrs, Robert.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Not properly sourced: the page doesn't confirm that the photographer is anonymous and there is no date of publication, so there is no way to confirm that it is out of copyright in the European Union. Furthermore, the {{
  Stefan2 (talk) 15:35, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ittner, Alfred.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Not properly sourced: the page doesn't confirm that the photographer is anonymous and there is no date of publication, so there is no way to confirm that it is out of copyright in the European Union. Furthermore, the {{
  Stefan2 (talk) 15:35, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Alfred Ittner 2.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Not properly sourced: the page doesn't confirm that the photographer is anonymous and there is no date of publication, so there is no way to confirm that it is out of copyright in the European Union. Furthermore, the {{
  Stefan2 (talk) 15:36, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bolender, Kurt.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Not properly sourced: the page doesn't confirm that the photographer is anonymous and there is no date of publication, so there is no way to confirm that it is out of copyright in the European Union. Furthermore, the {{
  Stefan2 (talk) 15:39, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wirth, Christian in uniform.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Not properly sourced: the page doesn't confirm that the photographer is anonymous and there is no date of publication, so there is no way to confirm that it is out of copyright in the European Union. Furthermore, the {{
  Stefan2 (talk) 15:40, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Münzberger, Gustav.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Not properly sourced: the page doesn't confirm that the photographer is anonymous and there is no date of publication, so there is no way to confirm that it is out of copyright in the European Union. Furthermore, the {{
  Stefan2 (talk) 15:40, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Stadie, Otto.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Not properly sourced: the page doesn't confirm that the photographer is anonymous and there is no date of publication, so there is no way to confirm that it is out of copyright in the European Union. Furthermore, the {{
  Stefan2 (talk) 15:41, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Suchomel, Franz.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Not properly sourced: the page doesn't confirm that the photographer is anonymous and there is no date of publication, so there is no way to confirm that it is out of copyright in the European Union. Furthermore, the {{
  Stefan2 (talk) 15:41, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Josef Oberhauser and Kurt Franz.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Not properly sourced: the page doesn't confirm that the photographer is anonymous and there is no date of publication, so there is no way to confirm that it is out of copyright in the European Union. Furthermore, the {{
  Stefan2 (talk) 15:41, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Josef Oberhauser at his trial.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

• There is no explanation as to why this would be out of copyright in the source country on the URAA date. This photo appears to have been taken during some trials after WWII, so I can't see how it can be out of copyright in the European Union.
  Stefan2 (talk) 15:41, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Horn, Otto.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• The licence is obviously hoax; no European country has a copyright term of 15 years or less for photos.
  Stefan2 (talk) 15:41, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Femke halsema Political Statement & Feminism.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• No license, no source, weird description. Mathonius (talk) 16:59, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as

]

File:Maryam Hassouni Anubis.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Mathonius (talk) 17:02, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Could you tag these as "no source and no licence" instead? --
    Stefan2 (talk) 00:42, 16 February 2012 (UTC)[reply
    ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as

]

File:Maryham Hassouni.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Mathonius (talk) 17:02, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as

]

File:220px-FemkeHalsemaMaastricht2.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Mathonius (talk) 17:02, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as

]

File:Femke halsema lr.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Mathonius (talk) 17:02, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment - I can't find the original file through TinEye etc., but likely cropped from an image downloaded from "somewhere on the internet". EXIF data looks suspicious to me. --He to Hecuba (talk) 17:09, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as

]

File:Rochelle Perts Winner & Talent.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Mathonius (talk) 17:25, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as

]

File:Rochelle Perts Winner of X factor.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Mathonius (talk) 17:27, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Wrong forum. The file is on Commons. Please nominate it for deletion there if you feel it is non-free. AnomieBOT⚡ 18:11, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:The Genealogy of Bharata.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

• User claims own work. Was permission/copyright properly clarified at upload? JanetteDoe (talk) 17:28, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Also, I tried to add notices on the image page and the uploader's talk page but they don't seem to be rendering correctly. As far as I can tell I followed the instructions on
  WP:PUF, so I'm a little confused. Could someone fix the pages or tell me how to do so? Thanks. JanetteDoe (talk) 18:05, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Hey I just checked and noticed that this image is up for deletion. I'm the owner of this work. I clarified the copyright when I uploaded it. But you may instruct me in the proper procedure if I've done something wrong. AmritP/SoA (talk) 20:09, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Henk Jan Smit X factor.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• See EXIF data. Mathonius (talk) 17:32, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Aladdin3 DC.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• See
  Stefan2 (talk) 18:56, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:SimpsonsXbox360.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Does this constitute an unauthorized derivative work? Acather96 (talk) 19:01, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • That's a difficult one. If it's being used to illustrate the console, perhaps the design can be treated as de minimis. Certainly use to illustrate the character would be infringing. --He to Hecuba (talk) 19:03, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

While PUF isn't really for discussing the nuances of NFCC (that would be NFCR or FFD), I agree that de minimis may apply if being used to illustrate the console - but it's worth noting that the image is only being used on two userpages. Acather96 (talk) 19:11, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cup Noodle.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Unauthorized derivative work of product/packaging, orphaned. Acather96 (talk) 19:06, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Traditionalfootballorange.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Found some TinEye matches that are very close, wondering if the work could have been extracted from those and simply re-coloured. Possible that the works are coincidentally similar, or that the works TinEye found used this file in violation of the license terms. Orphaned. Acather96 (talk) 19:16, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Avetik-Issahakian gerezman.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Tomb of
  Stefan2 (talk) 19:18, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Twin Mill.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Unauthorized derivative work of copyrighted product/toy/car. Acather96 (talk) 19:22, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Nuisance deletion, can be used to illustrate the car just as photograph of full sized car is not copyviolation of rights of Ford or Toyota. Bachcell (talk)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Top Eliminator.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Unauthorized derivative work of copyrighted product/toy/car Acather96 (talk) 19:23, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Torino Tornado.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Unauhorized derivative work of copyrighted product/toy/car. Acather96 (talk) 19:24, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Deora2.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Unauthorized derivative work of copyrighted product/toy/car, also seems to be licensed under a non-commercial use only license. Acather96 (talk) 19:25, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment Seems to be licensed under two or three licences.

I, Mr. Sinistar, took this picture and I have licensed it under the Creative Commons Attribution ShareAlike 3.0 license.

• • Quite clear: the licence is CC-BY-SA 3.0. But:

Here is the link to the license: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/

• • So is CC-BY-SA 3.0 sourced to the CC-BY-NC-SA 3.0 licence or is it licensed under both of them? Further down, it says {{
    Stefan2 (talk) 00:48, 16 February 2012 (UTC)[reply
    ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hot Wheels 2005 130.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Unauthorized derivative work of copyrighted product/toy/car/package Acather96 (talk) 19:26, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:BossMustangSizzler.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Unauthorized derivative work of copyrighted product/toy/car Acather96 (talk) 19:27, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Nuisance deletion, no copyright violation, same as photo of actual automobile as long as used to illustrate the car or toy in question Bachcell (talk)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sizzler Cal8 set.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Does this constitute an unauthorized derivative work? Acather96 (talk) 19:27, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:I-185.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Unauthorized derivative work of a model, orphaned. Acather96 (talk) 19:28, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Parajanov kev.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• See
  Stefan2 (talk) 19:33, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tomy Hootbot.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Unauthorized derivative work of copyrighted product/toy. Orphaned, also claimed to be 'used with permission', the GFDL self claim may not be valid. Acather96 (talk) 19:34, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Be-2.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Unauthorized derivative work of copyrighted model. Acather96 (talk) 19:37, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:BV222V-2.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Unauthorized derivative work of copyrighted model. Acather96 (talk) 19:37, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:TombMig17.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Unauthorized derivative work of copyrighted model, orphaned. Acather96 (talk) 19:38, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:MaistoBoss302.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Unauthorized derivative work of copyrighted product/toy/car, orphaned. Acather96 (talk) 19:42, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bellowhead - Toy.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Unauthorized derivative work of presumably copyrighted toy Acather96 (talk) 20:19, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Duros-toy.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Unauthorized derivative work of copyrighted toy. Acather96 (talk) 20:19, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:CivicSiSemaEdition.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Unauthorized derivative work of copyrighted toy/product, orphaned. Acather96 (talk) 20:24, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hot Wheels 001.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Unauthorized derivative work of copyrighted toy/product/packaging, orphaned. Acather96 (talk) 20:25, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hot Wheels 002.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Unauthorized derivative work of copyrighted toy/product/packaging, orphaned. Acather96 (talk) 20:25, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hot Wheels 004.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Unauthorized derivative work of copyrighted toy/product, orphaned, awful quality also makes this unencyclopedic. Acather96 (talk) 20:26, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hot Wheels 005.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Unauthorized derivative work of copyrighted toy/product/packaging, orphaned. Acather96 (talk) 20:26, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hot Wheels 007.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Unauthorized derivative work of copyrighted toy/product, orphaned, awful quality Acather96 (talk) 20:29, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hot Wheels 008.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Unauthorized derivative work of copyrighted toys/products/packaging, orphaned, awful quality. Acather96 (talk) 20:30, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hot Wheels.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Unauthorized derivative work of copyrighted toys/products/, orphaned. Acather96 (talk) 20:31, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:PDRM3148.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Unauthorized derivative work of copyrighted toy/product/packaging, orphaned. Acather96 (talk) 20:31, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Maisto Cars.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Unauthorized derivative works of copyrighted toys/products, orphaned. Acather96 (talk) 20:35, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Cars are usually considered utilitarian objects and thus only separable elements (flames painted on the side, for instance) can be copyrighted. I don't believe the fact that these are scale models negates that. This argument applies equally to other files you nommed except those with product packaging in the photo. Powers ^T 02:25, 16 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Wizardman (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 18:35, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Supercat Video.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Unauthorized derivative work Acather96 (talk) 21:15, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.