Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2012 January 24

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:04, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Karel.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

• The licences are most likely wrong.
  Stefan2 (talk) 00:57, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 07:04, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Afro-American.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Collage of 28 images, but only 27 images are sourced, so one image must be missing from the source list (not sure which one). Also note that
  Stefan2 (talk) 01:09, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:04, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:AGS Badge.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Doubtful GFDL, but might be kept as fair use :Jay8g
  WPIM 03:46, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:04, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Melinaperez2.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• obviously screencap from TV Denniss (talk) 03:54, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:04, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:CandiceMichellenew2.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• obviously screencap from TV Denniss (talk) 03:55, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:04, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Michelle McCool.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• obviously screencap from TV Denniss (talk) 03:55, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:04, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Angelamiss.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• obviously screencap from TV Denniss (talk) 03:55, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:04, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Fr.Angel de Blas O.P.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Image is from a book that was published in 2000, no proof of lack of copyright. --
  ЛееСуда. 14:41, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:04, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Fr.Eugeneo Jordan O.P.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Image is from a book that was published in 2000, no proof of lack of copyright. --
  ЛееСуда. 14:41, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:04, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Fr.Frederik Fermin O.P.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Image is from a book that was published in 2000, no proof of lack of copyright. --
  ЛееСуда. 14:42, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:04, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Fr. Chico Monteiro.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Orphaned image is sourced "Author's collection" and that it is in the PD. Image is also on website [1]. --
  ЛееСуда. 14:44, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:04, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Fr.Jesus Castanon O.P.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Orphaned image lists no true source although image is also in a bookc [2] published in 2000. --
  ЛееСуда. 14:51, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:04, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Fr.Jesus Diaz O.P.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Orphaned image lists no true source although image is also in a bookc [3] published in 2000. --
  ЛееСуда. 14:51, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:04, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Fr.Juan Labrador O.P.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Orphaned image lists no true source although image is also in a bookc [4] published in 2000. --
  ЛееСуда. 14:51, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:04, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Fr.Leonardo Legaspi O.P.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Orphaned image lists no true source although image is also in a bookc [5] published in 2000. --
  ЛееСуда. 14:51, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:04, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Fr.Manuel Arellano O.P.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Orphaned image lists no true source although image is also in a bookc [6] published in 2000. --
  ЛееСуда. 14:51, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:04, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Fr.Noberto Castillo O.P.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Orphaned image lists no true source although image is also in a bookc [7] published in 2000. --
  ЛееСуда. 14:52, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:04, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Fr.Serapio Tamayo O.P.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Orphaned image lists no true source although image is also in a bookc [8] published in 2000. --
  ЛееСуда. 14:52, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:04, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Fr.Silvestre Sancho O.P.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Orphaned image lists no true source although image is also in a bookc [9] published in 2000. --
  ЛееСуда. 14:52, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:04, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Virgin Mary.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• I doubt that this is own work.
  Stefan2 (talk) 16:28, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:04, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:D-Code thumbnail.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Appears to be a screencap. Kelly ^hi! 17:19, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep.-FASTILY ^(TALK) 09:35, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Louis Réard bikini.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Uploader has demonstrated complete ignorance of copyright; bigger resolution images of this exist on the 'net, so I really doubt the uploader holds the copyright. — Jeraphine Gryphon ^(talk) 17:44, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The person the picture contains has been dead for the past 28 years so in matters of copyright it has no definate owner. The picture has been optained from the website: http://autouniversum.wordpress.com/2009/03/12/louis-reard-never-to-be-forgotten-renault/

So in matters of copyright it should be considered public domain. There is no good reason why this picture or others I have posted should be deleted from wikipedia. Paulmcanders (talk) 19:33, 25 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• "The person the picture contains has been dead for the past 28 years so in matters of copyright it has no definate owner" -- copyright doesn't work that way. It's possible there's some fair use tag we can put on the image to keep it here, but it's not in public domain (AFAIK) and definitely not yours to put a CC license on it. — Jeraphine Gryphon ^(talk) 08:20, 26 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with {{
  dfu}} or list it at WP:Non-free content review. AnomieBOT⚡ 07:04, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 11:10, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:IMG 0685.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

• The version by
  Stefan2 (talk) 18:25, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Note The details of individual machines aren't visible in the image, so any copyright in the machine design would be irrelevant. There appears to have been at least two different images loaded under this name - I am not sure which image the copyright license details is relevant for. Bluap (talk) 10:55, 25 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • There were two files there yesterday, but I moved one of them to Commons and it seems that an admin later removed it from English Wikipedia. The licence details only refer to the version moved to Commons. I have now updated the file information page by removing any text referring to the file moved to Commons. The current information only refers to the
    Stefan2 (talk) 12:43, 25 January 2012 (UTC)[reply
    ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:04, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:UPboble.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• The 2008 file is taken from Flickr where it is listed as unfree (CC-BY-NC-ND). It is tagged as being from the Philippines on Flickr, so I suppose that both files need to be deleted per
  Stefan2 (talk) 18:46, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:04, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Playmobilsoccerplayers2.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Derivative work of copyrighted toys, poor quality and orphaned aswell. Acather96 (talk) 19:12, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:04, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Homobonus3.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Derivative work of a copyrighted toy/figure. Orphaned. Acather96 (talk) 19:13, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:04, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Homobonus2.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Derivative work of figure and packaging. Orphaned. Acather96 (talk) 19:14, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:04, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Homobonus1.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Unauthorized derivative work of figure/packaging. Orphaned. Acather96 (talk) 19:15, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:04, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Visine.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Unauthorized derivative work of product/logo - but does this meet the threshold of originality? Oprhaned. Acather96 (talk) 19:18, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:04, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Airgamboys.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Unauthorized derivative work of copyrighted toys/packaging. Acather96 (talk) 19:24, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Nomination withdrawn (

File:Asterixchips.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Unauthorized derivative work of product/packaging. Acather96 (talk) 19:30, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep I do not know whether the copyright of the packaging is relevant in this case. But, just in case, I have added a non-free use rationale for the packaging, to complement the PD tag for the photograph. (Note: I will not be following this discussion in detail.) Bluap (talk) 10:47, 25 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Now a non-free use rationale has been added that adequately explains how the file meets our

non-free copyright licensing tag, the original rationale for deletion is negated. Thanks Bluap - in consequence, nomination withdrawn. Acather96 (talk) 19:47, 25 January 2012 (UTC)[reply

]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 11:10, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kiddierides3.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Unauthorized derivative work of a kiddie ride. Acather96 (talk) 19:37, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment: The horse would be in the public domain if rides with this horse model with similar paint pattern, or any photos, advertising, or other copies with this horse model with similar pattern, were distributed to the public without a copyright notice at any point before (I think) 1985, and first appeared in the United States. --Closeapple (talk) 00:55, 26 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 11:10, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kiddierides2.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Unauthorized derivative work of a kiddie ride. Acather96 (talk) 19:39, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment: The ride would be in the public domain if rides with this horse model with similar paint patterns, or any photos, advertising, or other copies with this horse model with similar pattern, were distributed to the public at any point before (I think) 1985, and first appeared in the United States, and if the same is true for the roof. (The horse and roof don't need to be together before March 1989; they just need to each be like something that existed before 1985.) --Closeapple (talk) 01:11, 26 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 11:10, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:ChapelHillMallRide.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Unauthorized derivative work of a kiddie ride. Acather96 (talk) 19:41, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. This photo belongs to my sister. Uploaded by her permission. See summary and copyright notice on image. --DangApricot (talk) 22:41, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete The problem is not the photographer's permission but the ride designer's permission. See
  Stefan2 (talk) 22:59, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete: The ride's design appears to be 1990s or later; art after February 1989 doesn't need to have a copyright notice on it to attract copyright. Therefore, the photograph is derivative of the ride's copyrighted sculpture. (Like Stefan2 said, blame commons:COM:FOP#United States. Artistic works in public before 1978 are safe more often though.) --Closeapple (talk) 01:53, 26 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:04, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cfdride-r.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Unauthorized derivative work of a kiddie ride. No source as well. Acather96 (talk) 19:43, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:04, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sscvideocds.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Multiple unauthorized derivative works of packaging/characters. Acather96 (talk) 19:48, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:04, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Unboxed Clickstart Kit.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Unauthorized derivative work of toy/packaging. Acather96 (talk) 19:51, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:04, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Livita.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Unauthorized derivative work of product/packaging. Acather96 (talk) 19:54, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:04, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:User ram.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Multiple unauthorized derivative works of toys Acather96 (talk) 20:00, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 11:10, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dopod 838Pro.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Unauthorized derivative work of product/mobile phone. Acather96 (talk) 20:01, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Question from nominator: - per this, mobile phones themselves are not copyrighted as they are a unilateral object, but does the fact that this file pictures the phone's software mean that it sill constitutes an infringement? If not, then I will withdraw the nomination. Thanks, Acather96 (talk) 19:43, 25 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:04, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:PHOT0041.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Multiple unauthorized derivative works of DVD packaging. Orphaned and can I also ask the filename be salted if deleted as a junk name? Acather96 (talk) 20:08, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:04, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Spotride-aug05.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Unauthorized derivative work of kiddie ride. Acather96 (talk) 20:10, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:04, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Georgia henshaw 2 2008.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• This photo is identical aside from a picture with the agency Life - [10] It appear that this was cropped to hide their watermark. Rain the 1 21:24, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:04, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Germantown Baptist Church Model.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Image of a model - copyright should be with the modeller.  Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 21:33, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:04, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Westside Bus Company.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Orphaned image originally had a copyright on the image (2007 Steven Jamieson) that was removed under the guise of "removing watermark." Unknown true status of image. --
  ЛееСуда. 22:55, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:04, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Robert Perkins in 2008.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• No evidence uploader is copyright holder. Kelly ^hi! 23:42, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:04, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ronin.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• No evidence uploader is copyright holder. Kelly ^hi! 23:45, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 07:04, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rudolf wels.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• No evidence uploader is copyright holder. Kelly ^hi! 23:54, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:04, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rupert Read Main.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

• No evidence uploader is copyright holder. Kelly ^hi! 23:55, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.