Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2012 June 15

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete - The Bushranger's argument seems to be that BB was de minimis in this screenshot, which he was not. Another screenshot from this work which does not contain Bugs Bunny would in fact not be copyrighted. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:27, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Frame from an old print of the cartoon "Falling Hare".jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Derivative work of
  Stefan2 (talk) 00:05, 15 June 2012 (UTC)[reply
  ]
  • Wrong. It's from another cartoon, Falling Hare, which is in the public domain. ←Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} carrots→ 01:18, 15 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    • All illustrations of Bugs Bunny are derivative works of
      Stefan2 (talk) 01:25, 15 June 2012 (UTC)[reply
      ]
      • You don't know what you're talking about. Falling Hare is in the public domain. ←Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} carrots→ 01:36, 15 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
        • You have apparently still not read the deletion request I linked to. All illustrations of Bugs Bunny are copyrighted and they will remain so at least until the film
          Stefan2 (talk) 02:03, 15 June 2012 (UTC)[reply
          ]
          • You're making this stuff up. That image was uploaded like 6 years ago, and the issue was settled then. According to the upload note, Falling Hare's copyright was not renewed, and it became public domain. ←Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} carrots→ 02:07, 15 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
            • As I wrote, read the deletion request I linked to, and then go to Commons and read dozens of similar deletion requests. After that, also read
              Stefan2 (talk) 02:24, 15 June 2012 (UTC)[reply
              ]
              • It was OK 6 years ago, and it still is. You're inventing this stuff. ←Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} carrots→ 02:28, 15 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
                • You're still not reading the links I showed you. Another source here. --
                  Stefan2 (talk) 02:36, 15 June 2012 (UTC)[reply
                  ]
                  • The film is in the public domain. End of story. ←Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} carrots→ 02:42, 15 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
                    • Why are you refusing to read the pages I have linked to? --
                      Stefan2 (talk) 02:45, 15 June 2012 (UTC)[reply
                      ]
                      • Because the film is in the public domain, and your arguments are irrelevant. ←Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} carrots→ 02:48, 15 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep - "Falling Hare" is in the public domain. Any screenshots from "Falling Hare" are also in the public domain. It is not a representation of Bugs Bunny, which would be copyrighted, but a screenshot of "Falling Hare", which is not copyrighted. Depictions of the character are copyrighted, as is the character itself, unless they are direct, unaltered images taken from the PD material itself - which is what this is. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 02:26, 15 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - As per Bushranger. ←Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} carrots→ 02:29, 15 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep "Falling Hare is public domain while "A Wild Hare" is not. They are different things. Obtund 22:24, 15 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Why are you all refusing to read the links I provided? Why does this article state that a man had to pay a $500,000 fine for distributing copies of
    Stefan2 (talk) 22:49, 15 June 2012 (UTC)[reply
    ]
    • Because (1) Bugs Bunny is not Mickey Mouse; (2) "Falling Hare" is public domain; and therefore (3) your alleged arguments are bogus. ←Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} carrots→ 22:52, 15 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
      • Yeah he got that fine because it was a film and covered by the FBI. This is different, this is an image, and it is completely different from "A Wild Hare," as if they were the same they would under the same name, or subname. It is like saying twins are the same people, they look the same but they are not the same people. Obtund^Talk 23:27, 15 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
        • Hm? No, it says that the man was selling single screenshots from the Mickey Mouse film. This is an identical situation, except that it is Bugs Bunny instead of Mickey Mouse. --
          Stefan2 (talk) 12:59, 17 June 2012 (UTC)[reply
          ]
          • "Selling?" What is wikipedia "selling"? ←Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} carrots→ 14:45, 17 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
            • See
              Stefan2 (talk) 14:55, 17 June 2012 (UTC)[reply
              ]
• Why is this taking so long time? This is an obvious copyright violation. Just compare with similar deletion requests such as
  Stefan2 (talk) 12:58, 16 July 2012 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:05, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tennessee-day-recognition.pdf (delete | talk | history | logs).

File:Memphis-proclamation.pdf (delete | talk | history | logs).

File:New-orleans.pdf (delete | talk | history | logs).

• RomieGalaxy (talk · contribs) claims to be the copyright holder, however I don't know how he (or she) could be the copyright holder of a certificate from the state of Tennessee. kelapstick^(bainuu) 00:16, 15 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Incorrect Claim as the image was scanned, and no one has a copyright on a piece of paper. Obtund 22:28, 15 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Australian Business For Sale magazine cover.jpeg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• OTRS pending over 30 days - but I cannot find anything there, looked for
  • File:Australian Business For Sale magazine cover.jpeg
  • Australian Business
  • Images of covers
  • Wenkai31
  • www.businessforsale.com.au
    

No hits for this image  Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 00:28, 15 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Archway Internet Marketing Inc. Logo.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

• OTRS pending over 30 days - but I cannot find anything there, looked for
  • File:Archway Internet Marketing Inc. Logo.png
  • Archway Internet
  • Wenkai31
  • Christian Wilson
    

No hits for this image  Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 00:34, 15 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Baskets of Hope.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

• OTRS pending over 30 days - but I cannot find anything there, looked for
  • File:Baskets of Hope.png
  • Baskets of Hope
  • Baskets of hope
  • Wenkai31
  • ONE Children’s Foundation
    

No hits for this image  Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 00:37, 15 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bernd and Melany Würsig.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• OTRS pending over 30 days - but I cannot find anything there, looked for
  • File:Bernd and Melany Würsig.jpg
  • Bernd and Melany
  • Bernd Würsig (found File:Bernd Würsig in 2008 (photo by Sylvia Osterrieder).jpg)
  • Tasmaceto
  • E-Mail owner of File:Bernd Würsig in 2008 (photo by Sylvia Osterrieder).jpg
    

No hits for this image  Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 00:42, 15 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:MELA ILANDAIKULMc.s.i .jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• see commons:Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Selvakumar mallar Magog the Ogre (talk) 02:39, 15 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kattapomman Thun.JPEG (delete | talk | history | logs).

• see commons:Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Selvakumar mallar Magog the Ogre (talk) 03:29, 15 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:WOTE Beard guy with guitar headstock.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Screen capture of copyrighted video. Hobit (talk) 03:43, 15 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:WOTE Beard guy with a box.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Screen capture from what I believe is a copyrighted video. Hobit (talk) 03:44, 15 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mela IlandaikulamR.C CHURCH.JPEG (delete | talk | history | logs).

• see commons:Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Selvakumar mall Magog the Ogre (talk) 07:49, 15 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep as amended Skier Dude (talk) 02:41, 17 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Josef Mengele.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Post-1925 German photo, see
  Stefan2 (talk) 10:06, 15 June 2012 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• I have updated the licensing information, although I am not sure that this solves the situation.
  talk) 16:39, 21 June 2012 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with {{
  dfu}} or list it at WP:Non-free content review. AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:04, 17 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:DiceCream.PNG (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Dubious own work.
  Stefan2 (talk) 10:44, 15 June 2012 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:04, 17 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hms.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• See
  Stefan2 (talk) 10:53, 15 June 2012 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Note: The file was moved from File:Hms.jpg to File:Hms toy.jpg by Dipankan001 (talk · contribs) at 10:57, 15 June 2012 (UTC). AnomieBOT⚡ 12:05, 15 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • What's the point in renaming a file if it might be deleted soon anyway? --
    Stefan2 (talk) 12:11, 15 June 2012 (UTC)[reply
    ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:GSL.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Dubious own work: looks like something taken from a commercial advertisement or something.
  Stefan2 (talk) 13:27, 15 June 2012 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:04, 17 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sinclair2.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• See
  Stefan2 (talk) 13:57, 15 June 2012 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:04, 17 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Culloden Cairn Knoydart.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• See
  Stefan2 (talk) 13:58, 15 June 2012 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pepito.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Does "Computer file" and the upload summary mean that this is not own work but instead something which happened to be on the user's computer because he had previously downloaded it from [1]?
  Stefan2 (talk) 14:12, 15 June 2012 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep as fair use only. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:08, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

talk | history | logs

).

• It says that this was published before 1923 but no pre-1923 publication is listed.
  Stefan2 (talk) 14:21, 15 June 2012 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Keep - The following publicatopn lists image as taken in 1911 - “Figuras Historicas De Puerto Rico, Vol. 2” ; Eitor: Adolfo R. Lopez; Page 11; 2000. Publisher:
  Puerto Rican Institute of Culture". Tony the Marine (talk) 18:10, 15 June 2012 (UTC)[reply
  ]

Note It is the image in "Commons" [2], of another person with the same name that should be looked into. The image in commons claims to have been self-taken which is unlikely. Tony the Marine (talk) 18:10, 15 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If the 2000 publication was the first publication of the photo, then the photo is copyrighted until the end of 2047 or until 70 years after the photographer died, whichever is later. As I wrote, the template claims that the photo was published before 1923, but no pre-1923 publication has been listed. Taking a photo is not the same thing as publishing a photo. --

Stefan2 (talk) 18:32, 15 June 2012 (UTC)[reply

]

It is unknown when the image was first published. It is the only known photo of the subject in question. The publication states thet the image was taken in 1911, therefore since copyright laws did not apply when the image was taken it is PD and the publication (a government publlication) and anyone else who may desire to publish it may do so. Such is the case for example when you come upon an image of Abraham Lincoln or Thomas Edison in a history book. Image of a historical person pre-1923. Tony the Marine (talk) 22:23, 15 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Er, are you saying that there were no copyright laws in 1911? Haven't you heard of the

Stefan2 (talk) 22:43, 15 June 2012 (UTC)[reply

]

• You know perfectly well what I am saying. We are talking about the copyright laws that apply to the United States. Puerto Rico has been a territory of the United States since 1898, way before the copyright laws of 1923 applied. This image has been used numerious times including in the "JOSE IGNACIO QUINTON - Obras Completas Aguinaldos Vol. 5". Tony the Marine (talk) 22:53, 15 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - Another thing can be done. As an logical option instead of deleting the image, I could fix the file content and place a "fair use rationale". The image is only used in the subjects bio. to give a physical decription of the subject. Any thoughts? Tony the Marine (talk) 06:13, 16 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 04:04, 17 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:ErikClementTown1978.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• See
  Stefan2 (talk) 14:24, 15 June 2012 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Magog the Ogre (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:05, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ele.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Copyvio from here?
  Stefan2 (talk) 14:27, 15 June 2012 (UTC)[reply
  ]

Sure is the same image, so it appears to be a copyvio unless the image on care2.com was originally obtained from Wikipedia!

stoned 10:07, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply

]

• Note: The file was moved from File:Ele.jpg to File:Elephant outside the town of Chalsa.jpg by DragonflySixtyseven (talk · contribs) at 21:49, 29 July 2012 (UTC). AnomieBOT⚡ 00:03, 30 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep, previous revision deleted. — ξ^xplicit 01:08, 25 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Compression Set A Diagram.gif (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Probably eligible for copyright.
  Stefan2 (talk) 15:26, 15 June 2012 (UTC)[reply
  ]
  • Keep Surely the file consists of only a few simple geometric shapes and hence is not eligible for copyright? It does not seem original as it is only a diagram of an experiment which is reasonably commonly used around the world. Cliff12345 (talk) 16:50, 15 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    • I've uploaded a new version which I made myself, please remove this image from the unfree files page. Cliff12345 (talk) 13:49, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep, previous revision deleted. — ξ^xplicit 01:08, 25 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Compression Set B Diagram.gif (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Probably eligible for copyright.
  Stefan2 (talk) 15:27, 15 June 2012 (UTC)[reply
  ]
  • Keep Surely the file consists of only a few simple geometric shapes and hence is not eligible for copyright? It does not seem original as it is only a diagram of an experiment which is reasonably commonly used around the world. Cliff12345 (talk) 16:50, 15 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    • I've uploaded a new version which I made myself, please remove this image from the unfree files page. Cliff12345 (talk) 13:32, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep - credible assertion of ownership. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:25, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:BMW R68 drive shaft.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Seems to be copyvio from here. However, Wikipedia's file is heavily cropped and still has more pixels than the other photo.
  Stefan2 (talk) 15:36, 15 June 2012 (UTC)[reply
  ]

• • It is not cropped at all! I do not know why you are so sure it was. I took this picture at the same time I took the picture you think it is cropped from (I do not think you were there at the time watching). When I loaded the photo I checked the "free" box. So what is wrong? I haven't uploaded any photos for a long time. Perhaps it is not worth the bother to do so. Jeffrey M Dean (talk) 16:27, 15 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• • • BTW, look at the photos you are comparing. The one on the bmwmoa forum has a lake in the background. The one I uploaded has saguaros in the background. Have you ever seen saguaros growing by a midwestern lake? Jeffrey M Dean (talk) 17:00, 15 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
      • Sorry, I've never been west of
        Stefan2 (talk) 19:46, 15 June 2012 (UTC)[reply
        ]
        • How can I prove that I took the photos? The photo of the handsome man standing by the R68 further down on on my R68 web page ([4]) is me. You can see the saguaros behind me and in the photo I uploaded. I think that is pretty good evidence. (BTW, below is a photo I took and uploaded behind my Tucson house. Snow is very, very rare in Tucson.) My parents are deceased so they cannot vouch for me. My wife, Jill, could but you would have no more reason to believe her than me. Any advice you can offer I would welcome. Jeffrey M Dean

• Keep
  WP:BEANS. --Dennis Bratland (talk) 23:40, 15 June 2012 (UTC)[reply
  ]

It's entirely possible that they're taken by the same photographer on the same day, but none of that is any indication of a copyvio. Andy Dingley (talk) 13:34, 16 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete - file may be undeleted or reuploaded if it can be shown it is {{PD-US-no notice}}, but it must have been published (not created) before 1978 without copyright notice. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:31, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Roger-Davis-Pic.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• This looks to be a photo cropped from another source and not the original work of the uploader. We hope (talk) 18:11, 15 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • That's Roger Davis as he looked in the 1970s. Clearly it wasn't made in 2008. Uncle G (talk) 13:39, 16 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • I am the one who assembled most of this information AND posted this photo, IIRC, several years ago. What exactly is it you want, and why is it NOW an issue? This photo is most likely from Roger's "Alias Smith and Jones" era in the early 1970s, and certainly is out of the usual 26(?)-year copyright range, anyway, if it is indeed not of Roger's property. And the reference to 2008...where is this coming from? So no photo of RD is accepted if older than 2008? I'm sure RD can supply me with a 2008-era photo, but he's certainly not as recognizable now as he would be in a photo from the 1970s. For reference, I am Roger Davis' cousin and webmaster, Mike Shannon. See www.rogerdavisonline.com. Please advise so this can be resolved. user:shannon914 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.6.141.85 (talk) 01:02, 19 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    • The uploader wasn't you, 99.6.141.85. It was CaseyRockStar (talk · contribs), and that person claimed that the image was made in 2008, by someone with the unlikely name of "BroncoBuff". That's a fairly obvious falsehood, given the picture. It's an issue now because it has always been an issue. It just hasn't been spotted until now. This is false copyright and authorship information. Uncle G (talk) 16:23, 19 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

FWIW, I discovered the file after locating a PD image of Roger Davis which I uploaded to Commons as File:Roger Davis Alias Smith and Jones 1972.JPG. If the outcome of this discussion is to delete the file we're talking about, I will replace the file we're discussing with the Commons one so there will be a photo on the article. We hope (talk) 17:20, 19 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• • Thanks for the info and explanation. Sorry, I'm not trying to be difficult. I will get with Roger in the meantime and see if he has any specific photos he absolutely owns that could be uploaded to Wiki. He may be OK with the one you located. And thanks for researching the origin of the posted photo...I believe I have the same one on rogerdavisonline.com and assumed I sent it along. (And I realize that I'm posting this without signing in, due to time constraints at the moment...but I am indeed user "shannon914". — Preceding unsigned comment added by 204.64.21.50 (talk) 08:03, 21 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Magog the Ogre (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:05, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cover of the book "Lessons from Quran".jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Dubious own work: book cover.
  Stefan2 (talk) 23:05, 15 June 2012 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:02, 25 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:NS-2012-U10-trophy.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• It is dubious whether the trophy counts as permanently installed as required by
  Stefan2 (talk) 23:10, 15 June 2012 (UTC)[reply
  ]

I am happy to relinquish all rights to the image, i took the image of the matches and trophy as i described when i uploaded the image, just advise how to make this declaration. How do i make this image Public domain - {{PD-self}} - The creator permanently relinquishes all rights to the work? — Preceding unsigned comment added by [[User:{{{1}}}|{{{1}}}]] ([[User talk:{{{1}}}|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/{{{1}}}|contribs]])

If you created the trophy (as opposed to just taking a photo of it), please follow the instructions at

Stefan2 (talk) 22:06, 19 June 2012 (UTC)[reply

]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:02, 25 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:NS-2012-peppermill.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• It is dubious whether the trophy counts as permanently installed as required by
  Stefan2 (talk) 23:10, 15 June 2012 (UTC)[reply
  ]

I am happy to relinquish all rights to the image, i took the image of the matches and trophy as i described when i uploaded the image, just advise how to make this declaration. How do i make this image Public domain - {{PD-self}} - The creator permanently relinquishes all rights to the work? — Preceding unsigned comment added by [[User:{{{1}}}|{{{1}}}]] ([[User talk:{{{1}}}|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/{{{1}}}|contribs]])

If you created the trophy (as opposed to just taking a photo of it), please follow the instructions at

Stefan2 (talk) 22:07, 19 June 2012 (UTC)[reply

]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:02, 25 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:NS-Jo-Beveridge-NetballShield.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• It is dubious whether the shield counts as permanently installed as required by
  Stefan2 (talk) 23:11, 15 June 2012 (UTC)[reply
  ]

I am happy to relinquish all rights to the image, i took the image of the shield as i described when i uploaded the image, just advise how to make this declaration. How do i make this image Public domain - {{PD-self}} - The creator permanently relinquishes all rights to the work? — Preceding unsigned comment added by [[User:{{{1}}}|{{{1}}}]] ([[User talk:{{{1}}}|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/{{{1}}}|contribs]])

If you created the trophy (as opposed to just taking a photo of it), please follow the instructions at

Stefan2 (talk) 22:07, 19 June 2012 (UTC)[reply

]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:02, 25 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:NS-2011-old-trophy.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• It is dubious whether the trophy counts as permanently installed as required by
  Stefan2 (talk) 23:11, 15 June 2012 (UTC)[reply
  ]

I am happy to relinquish all rights to the image, i took the image of the trophy as i described when i uploaded the image, just advise how to make this declaration. How do i make this image Public domain - {{PD-self}} - The creator permanently relinquishes all rights to the work? — Preceding unsigned comment added by [[User:{{{1}}}|{{{1}}}]] ([[User talk:{{{1}}}|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/{{{1}}}|contribs]])

If you created the trophy (as opposed to just taking a photo of it), please follow the instructions at

Stefan2 (talk) 22:07, 19 June 2012 (UTC)[reply

]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Magog the Ogre (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:05, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mobilefyi.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Dubious own work: software.
  Stefan2 (talk) 23:12, 15 June 2012 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: fair use Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:20, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Golf Kingdoms icon.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Dubious own work: software icon.
  Stefan2 (talk) 23:12, 15 June 2012 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:02, 25 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Corazon Aquino Monument.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• No freedom of panorama in the Philippines, see
  Stefan2 (talk) 23:14, 15 June 2012 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Agree, Delete  Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 21:33, 6 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:02, 25 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Philip II- King of Spain, the Americas and the Philippines.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• No freedom of panorama in the Philippines, see
  Stefan2 (talk) 23:27, 15 June 2012 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Agree, Delete  Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 21:41, 6 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:02, 25 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Memorare Manila Monument.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• No freedom of panorama in the Philippines, see
  Stefan2 (talk) 23:28, 15 June 2012 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Agree, Delete  Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 21:41, 6 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment
  WP:TAMBAY was not informed of the mass deletions, among other possibly aggrieved parties. Personally, while I respect people's copyrights, we have to put into question which values we have to uphold here, particularly in countries which are not as forthright as the Philippines with respect to these matters: adherence to the law, or the educative value of the works in question. I'm utterly surprised that people are willing to force people to choose which is more important.:| --Sky Harbor ^(talk) 06:29, 18 August 2012 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:02, 25 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pinaglabanan Shrine.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

• No freedom of panorama in the Philippines, see
  Stefan2 (talk) 23:42, 15 June 2012 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with {{
  dfu}} or list it at WP:Non-free content review. AnomieBOT⚡ 08:04, 16 June 2012 (UTC)[reply
  ]
  • It is not tagged as non-free. It is tagged as a free photo (although it does have a fair use rationale). --
    Stefan2 (talk) 13:53, 16 June 2012 (UTC)[reply
    ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Magog the Ogre (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:05, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bandcamp pic.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Dubious own work: magazine cover.
  Stefan2 (talk) 23:44, 15 June 2012 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Magog the Ogre (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:05, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Main zindagi hoon Still.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Dubious own work: film poster.
  Stefan2 (talk) 23:44, 15 June 2012 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep - marked as OTRS accepted. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:36, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ross-castle-drawing.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Sourced to an external website using a {{
  Stefan2 (talk) 23:46, 15 June 2012 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Keep - The museum staff indicated the drawing was state sponsored and in the public domain. I took the photo and cleaned it up. I also emailed permissions-en@ with permission. Rackmount-guy (talk) 00:36, 16 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • In that case, you should tag the image with {{
    Stefan2 (talk) 13:55, 16 June 2012 (UTC)[reply
    ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: fair use Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:16, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Prothom Alo.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Daily newspaper. No evidence of permission.
  Stefan2 (talk) 23:46, 15 June 2012 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as

File:Champions League Final 2012.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• I don't think that the Flickr user is the copyright holder to this item.
  Stefan2 (talk) 23:50, 15 June 2012 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.