Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2012 October 30

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:02, 7 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Registered Texas Historical Landmark Marker for The Grove.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Violates the copyright of the sign.
  Stefan2 (talk) 01:46, 30 October 2012 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:02, 7 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Zim-Zoom Cabaret.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• see commons:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Zim-Zoom Cabaret.jpg Magog the Ogre (t • c) 02:09, 30 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:02, 7 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Galion T-700.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Caption shows image from 1955 (or later) yet the Public Domain license suggests 1923 or earlier. The uploader does not provide a link to the source or claim to have taken the photo (like s/he did on another photo). Royalbroil 02:20, 30 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as

File:Maria Aeris.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Not clear if the uploader was the photographer, with no camera metadata. A Google reverse image search (with the results generating a URL so long I won't be posting it) showed the image in use on numourous websites but not Flickr as sourced. In any case, this licensing doesn't add-up as
  CT Cooper · talk 10:22, 30 October 2012 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete It is listed as "all rights reserved" on Flickr.[1] It was uploaded to Flickr on the day before photography, so Flickr is likely the original source. --
  Stefan2 (talk) 10:42, 30 October 2012 (UTC)[reply
  ]
  • Well spotted, yes it was almost certainly taken from there.
    CT Cooper · talk 14:31, 30 October 2012 (UTC)[reply
    ]
    • Well, I just did a simple Google search for the image on Wikipedia. Some of the pages hotlinked to Flickr, and if you have the Flickr image name, you can get the URL to the Flickr file information page by entering the decimal number in the file name here. Fill in the "photo_id" (the long decimal number in the Flickr filename) and click on "Call Method..." The output is a lot of text in XML format, and the URL to the file information page appears somewhere at the bottom. --
      Stefan2 (talk) 14:56, 30 October 2012 (UTC)[reply
      ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:02, 7 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rangmilanti.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Appears to be screenshot and/or promotional image. Highly unlikely to be self-created by uploader. Kinu ^t/_c 11:03, 30 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

* See also User_talk:Sharmishthapal#Image_copyright.21. I asked the editor to send copies of permission to Wikimedia. Most probably they have not done it still. I also asked the same question here User_talk:Sharmishthapal#Gaurav_Chakraborty_image.21 where I did not get any reply. Since the editor is not very active in Wikipedia, I'll suggest not to speedily delete these files. I have a hunch these works are not copyvio, but surely they are not following the procedure! I am suggesting to make a list of editor's all uploads where permission may be required and asking them to follow procedure, but, not quick deletion at this moment!--Tito Dutta (talk) 11:23, 30 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

To be fair, I'm fairly certain they are. This user has a slew of warnings about improper uploads on their talk page, and a history of misrepresentation and false licensing... I deleted several obvious screenshots (with station identification watermarks on the images) that were uploaded as self-created with a free license. Also, all of these images were uploaded well over a year ago, and there have been repeated requests for permission, including from yourself, since then. It's one thing to assume good faith, but given this user's apparent disregard for copyright policy, I doubt we'll be seeing a legitimate response anytime soon. --Kinu ^t/_c 13:48, 30 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 05:02, 7 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gaurav photobucket.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Appears to be screenshot and/or promotional image. Highly unlikely to be self-created by uploader. Based on title, copied from Photobucket. Kinu ^t/_c 11:05, 30 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please see comments @ #File:Rangmilanti.jpg --Tito Dutta (talk) 11:23, 30 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:02, 7 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Robikiron.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Appears to be screenshot and/or promotional image. Highly unlikely to be self-created by uploader. Based on text in the article in which it is used, this image is of the actor in character and is thus likely part of a promotional package by the studio. Kinu ^t/_c 11:06, 30 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please see comments @ #File:Rangmilanti.jpg --Tito Dutta (talk) 11:23, 30 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:02, 7 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Austin Brown headshot.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Cant find image at http://austin.jackson-source.com/, and unless original uploader is the owner of this site also the {{PD-self}} is likely invalid. Nikthestunned 12:19, 30 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 05:02, 7 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Samsung ATIV S press shot.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• see commons:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Samsung ATIV S press shot.jpg Magog the Ogre (t • c) 16:22, 30 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:02, 7 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:The new Singapore Skyline.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• OTRS >30 days old. OTRS queue checked for the file name and no hits  Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 23:41, 30 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:02, 7 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:The Professor in Action.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• OTRS >30 days old. OTRS queue checked for the file name and no hits  Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 23:42, 30 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:02, 7 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Thomas Alexander of New College.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• OTRS >30 days old. OTRS queue checked for the file name and no hits  Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 23:44, 30 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:02, 7 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Thornton Willis in his NYC studio, Nov. 2000.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• OTRS >30 days old. OTRS queue checked for the file name and no hits  Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 23:46, 30 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:02, 7 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Three pistols carried by John Frost on Chartist march 1839.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• OTRS >30 days old. OTRS queue checked for the file name and no hits  Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 23:47, 30 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:02, 7 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Webcam Social Shopper Interface.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• OTRS >30 days old. OTRS queue checked for the file name and no hits  Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 23:56, 30 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:02, 7 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:William Cortez Reynaldo.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• OTRS >30 days old. OTRS queue checked for the file name and no hits  Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 23:57, 30 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.