The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Flickr version of image[1] tagged as noncommercial. Kellyhi! 02:27, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
This is a letter, so can't be own work as claimed. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:05, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Resent email: Brief - User has obtained verbal approval from company - what proof do I need to submit to Wikipedia - an email confirmation from the respective company? Thanks NGayanP
Hello. Please check your email; you've got mail! The subject is File:Alltex EPZ Logo.jpg. It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{
ygm
}} template.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Rear of oyster card, whose design is nominally owned by TfL Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:55, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Kept, with the addition of a fair use rationale. Dianna (talk) 21:32, 1 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
This is a derivative work of a copyrighted logo, and so the creator cannot put into public domain.Wgunther (talk) 17:08, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
A PUF relisting was suggested with this edit by King of Hearts on DR. In this case, it's perfectly reasonable to believe, even expect that the person in charge of the project would have copyright authority over its product. I think we should believe a user who claims to be and pretty clearly is (look at his edits) Associate Dean at the Harvard School of Public Health when he claims he created the content and clearly, at a minimum, spearheaded their creation. All the deleted files at http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&action=view&user=Prof756 should be restored. I detect copyright paranoia. --Elvey (talk) 18:16, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
You say Try to get someone to undelete it during the PUF discussion. You hadn't noticed that AnomieBOT was preventing that discussion by closing it? Please. You say impossible. People can still look at the images at their source; see prior discussions.--Elvey (talk) 18:12, 17 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
was something over sighted here? The only recent image I see is the placeholder. --B (talk) 12:29, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Never mind, I didn't read. Deleting. --B (talk) 12:34, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Keep as PD-US-not renewed. (ESkog)(Talk) 17:53, 17 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
This Canadian work is in the public domain in Canada because its copyright has expired for one of the following reasons:
it was subject to Crown copyright and was first published before 1963,
it was a photograph created before 1949,
it was a photograph that was created after 1948 — but before 1962 — and the copyright was owned by a corporation,
it was an unpublished work created by an author who died before 1949,
it was otherwise a work created by an author who died before 1963 (subject to transitional rules for unpublished works by authors who died after 1948 but before 1999),
where the creator is unknown, the work was published before 1963 or (if not published) created before 1938.
"Unknown" doesn't mean that the creator isn't named in the comic book but that the name of the creator isn't revealed within 50 years from publication. This page tells that the creators of several of the stories have been identified although I believe that no one was named in the comic book. No identified creator is listed for this particular story, so maybe that means that the creator is unknown, and it is unclear if those other names were identified during the first 50 years after publication or if they were first identified at a later point.
Additionally, the source country isn't Canada but the United States as True Comics was a US publication. I can't find True Comics in the copyright renewal records for 1970, so I suppose it's {{
I have a copy of the comic. There is no author/illustrator identified. The original file was actually found at the Canada National Public Archives, even though there is no doubt that it was originally a long defunct U.S. publication. I had checked with the biographer of the engineer that was the subject of the comic book profile and he assured me that the material was in the public domain in both the U.S. and Canada. FWiW Bzuk (talk) 15:24, 17 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete. (ESkog)(Talk) 17:55, 17 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Pictures of models themselves are not copyright infringement. You cannot easily have articles on model types without showing examples. Wikipedia commons is full of pictures of model cars that are arranged by the photographer and are not copyrighted.--Cstevencampbell (talk) 03:23, 15 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Derivative work of toys. The kind of images that you are talking about are frequently deleted from Commons. --
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Something is fishy here. The uploader claims that he took the photo in 2009, but the EXIF tells that it was taken in 2006, and there is a low-quality copy of it at http://www.tclsl.org/Chapel.html
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
I can't find anything directly online, but the author is listed as Paul Karslake, who is still alive. Uploader has used a PD-author copyright tag. ALH (talk) 23:52, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Source and author are just listed as Theo Jones. The date given is only the upload date. Uploader has used a PD-author copyright tag. ALH (talk) 23:58, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
