Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2013 June 2

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by INeverCry (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:04, 12 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kelly UFo Incident drawing of alleged aliens and spacecraft.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Seems to be a duplicate of above. LuckyLouie (talk) 00:52, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by INeverCry (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:04, 12 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Goundamani.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Probably taken from http://s.ahan.in//images/celebs/Goundamani/100.jpg —Vensatry _{(Ping me)} 06:58, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by INeverCry (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:04, 12 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Chancelloriid scleritomes 01.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

File:Chancelloriia scleritomes detail 01.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

• The source PDF - http://palaeo-electronica.org/2000_1/fossils/text.pdf - gives no reason to believe that the image is in the public domain. (The image is on page 2 of the PDF.) The author of the PDF is Stefan Bengtson, which was not Philcha's real name. There is no reason to believe the license is authentic. B (talk) 13:16, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by INeverCry (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:04, 12 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Orthrozanclus temp 2.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Philcha (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Cropped from http://avancna.deviantart.com/art/Orthrozanclus-reburrus-V1-50021456 - I don't see any statement of permission on the source website and as far as I know, DeviantArt does not use any kind of copyleft license. B (talk) 13:22, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by INeverCry (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:04, 12 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hadrocodium skull.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Image is from http://sciencev1.orf.at/sciencev1.orf.at/science/news/13685.html (direct image URL). View page info on the image dates it to 2001. I also found [1]. So while I don't know who the original image author is, it seems doubtful that the uploader was. B (talk) 13:29, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by INeverCry (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:04, 12 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Faceshot of author Saumya Balsari.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• It says that this was received by e-mail, so it is unlikely own work. Also, the uploader seems to claim that this is a photo of the uploader, so it is unlikely that the uploader is the photographer. Also, it was previously published at http://www.saumyabalsari.com/ and various other places so we need OTRS confirmation from the photographer.
  Stefan2 (talk) 15:20, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• delete unless OTRS-verified. This should have been left in the di-no-permission queue, obviously. Fut.Perf. ☼ 12:05, 7 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by INeverCry (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:04, 12 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Anomalocaris Saron 200x59 02.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

• I can't find this exact drawing, but it's obviously the work of this person - http://www.trilobites.info/background3.html - (See [2] - I think the upload is a photoshop of this one). See also commons:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Kerygmachela dorsal 193x70.png where the same user uploaded another photo from this website. B (talk) 16:14, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Cleaned up; Kept. Diannaa (talk) 21:28, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Caradog Roberts as Young Man.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Source is claimed as "own work" but it's clearly a photograph of a signed picture. The date/source of the actual work are unclear, though, and it may qualify for PD due to its age. (ESkog)^(Talk) 18:03, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment according to the article, this was a postcard from 1915 -- 70.24.245.196 (talk) 21:41, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Cleaned up and Kept. Diannaa (talk) 21:30, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Postcard from Caradog Roberts to Rachel Jenkins.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Uploader is clearly not rightsholder, although as with the above image it may be old enough to be PD. The card appears to be dated 18 Nov 15. I'm not totally clear on what kind of licensing would apply to private mail if it was never published prior to this upload. (ESkog)^(Talk) 18:05, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Probably {{
    Stefan2 (talk) 18:35, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply
    ]
  • According to Rachie, Dr. Carados Roberts died in 1935. So it's public domain both places if the rule is life + 70. --B (talk) 21:30, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep out of copyright per above -- 70.24.245.196 (talk) 21:38, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep: the stamps itself is out of copyright per {{PD-UKGov}} and the postcard reverse and writing appear to be ineligible. ww2censor (talk) 10:03, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by INeverCry (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:04, 12 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ninoy-aquino.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• NATv is listed as the source; I don't know what that is but given uploader's other contributions it's unlikely he/she was alive to take this picture. (ESkog)^(Talk) 18:13, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Deleted; the article already contains a similar non-free photo. Diannaa (talk) 22:42, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ninoyassassination.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• As above, sourced to NATv, and unlikely to be uploader's own work. (ESkog)^(Talk) 18:14, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Convert to fairuse historic non-free image. Assassin and assassinated at assassination in one non-collage image -- 70.24.245.196 (talk) 21:34, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Covert to fairuse Certainly can be used in the
  Assassination of Benigno Aquino, Jr. article as a non-free historic image. Canuck^{89 (chat with me)}
  03:08, June 9, 2013 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete: Some of these images were deleted back in 2009 as no evidence of permission; it was only after that that the user claimed they were sourced to the City Information Office. For example, see Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2009 July 10#File:Tagum City Hall Night.jpg.We have no evidence that they're actually from the City Info Office as claimed Diannaa (talk) 23:05, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Freedompark night.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Sourced to "City Information Office" - extremely unlikely that uploader holds copyright. (ESkog)^(Talk) 18:15, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Move to Commons This photo (and all the other photos of Tagum from the City Information Office), if it did come from the City Information Office, would be PD in the Philippines. --Sky Harbor ^(talk) 14:05, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete: Some of these images were deleted back in 2009 as no evidence of permission; it was only after that that the user claimed they were sourced to the City Information Office. For example, see Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2009 July 10#File:Tagum City Hall Night.jpg.We have no evidence that they're actually from the City Info Office as claimed Diannaa (talk) 23:05, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Freedompark day.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Sourced to "City Information Office" - extremely unlikely that uploader holds copyright. (ESkog)^(Talk) 18:16, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete: Some of these images were deleted back in 2009 as no evidence of permission; it was only after that that the user claimed they were sourced to the City Information Office. For example, see Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2009 July 10#File:Tagum City Hall Night.jpg. Diannaa (talk) 23:05, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mary's Woods.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• As above, another "City Information Office" image. (ESkog)^(Talk) 18:17, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete: Some of these images were deleted back in 2009 as no evidence of permission; it was only after that that the user claimed they were sourced to the City Information Office. For example, see Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2009 July 10#File:Tagum City Hall Night.jpg.We have no evidence that they're actually from the City Info Office as claimed Diannaa (talk) 23:05, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tagumcity christmastree2008.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• As above, another "City Information Office" image. (ESkog)^(Talk) 18:17, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete: Some of these images were deleted back in 2009 as no evidence of permission; it was only after that that the user claimed they were sourced to the City Information Office. For example, see Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2009 July 10#File:Tagum City Hall Night.jpg.We have no evidence that they're actually from the City Info Office as claimed Diannaa (talk) 23:05, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tagumcity newyear2008.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• As above, another "City Information Office" image. (ESkog)^(Talk) 18:17, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete: Some of these images were deleted back in 2009 as no evidence of permission; it was only after that that the user claimed they were sourced to the City Information Office. For example, see Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2009 July 10#File:Tagum City Hall Night.jpg.We have no evidence that they're actually from the City Info Office as claimed Diannaa (talk) 23:05, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Band musikahan.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• As above, another "City Information Office" image. (ESkog)^(Talk) 18:18, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete: Some of these images were deleted back in 2009 as no evidence of permission; it was only after that that the user claimed they were sourced to the City Information Office. For example, see Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2009 July 10#File:Tagum City Hall Night.jpg.We have no evidence that they're actually from the City Info Office as claimed Diannaa (talk) 23:05, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tagumcitypanorama.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• As above, another "City Information Office" image. (ESkog)^(Talk) 18:18, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:02, 25 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Davao sports complex concept.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Concept design of a planned sports complex; unlikely that uploader holds the rights to this image. (ESkog)^(Talk) 18:19, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete: Some of these images were deleted back in 2009 as no evidence of permission; it was only after that that the user claimed they were sourced to the City Information Office. For example, see Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2009 July 10#File:Tagum City Hall Night.jpg.We have no evidence that they're actually from the City Info Office as claimed Diannaa (talk) 23:05, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tagumcity christmas.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• As above, another "City Information Office" image. (ESkog)^(Talk) 18:19, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete: Some of these images were deleted back in 2009 as no evidence of permission; it was only after that that the user claimed they were sourced to the City Information Office. For example, see Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2009 July 10#File:Tagum City Hall Night.jpg.We have no evidence that they're actually from the City Info Office as claimed Diannaa (talk) 23:05, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Deped tagumcity.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• As above, another "City Information Office" image. (ESkog)^(Talk) 18:20, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete: Some of these images were deleted back in 2009 as no evidence of permission; it was only after that that the user claimed they were sourced to the City Information Office. For example, see Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2009 July 10#File:Tagum City Hall Night.jpg.We have no evidence that they're actually from the City Info Office as claimed Diannaa (talk) 23:05, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tagumcity choir.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• As above, another "City Information Office" image. (ESkog)^(Talk) 18:20, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete: Some of these images were deleted back in 2009 as no evidence of permission; it was only after that that the user claimed they were sourced to the City Information Office. For example, see Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2009 July 10#File:Tagum City Hall Night.jpg.We have no evidence that they're actually from the City Info Office as claimed Diannaa (talk) 23:05, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tagumcity christmastree.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• As above, another "City Information Office" image. (ESkog)^(Talk) 18:21, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete: Some of these images were deleted back in 2009 as no evidence of permission; it was only after that that the user claimed they were sourced to the City Information Office. For example, see Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2009 July 10#File:Tagum City Hall Night.jpg.We have no evidence that they're actually from the City Info Office as claimed Diannaa (talk) 23:05, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Palmtrees tagumcity.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• As above, another "City Information Office" image. (ESkog)^(Talk) 18:22, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete: Some of these images were deleted back in 2009 as no evidence of permission; it was only after that that the user claimed they were sourced to the City Information Office. For example, see Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2009 July 10#File:Tagum City Hall Night.jpg.We have no evidence that they're actually from the City Info Office as claimed Diannaa (talk) 23:05, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tagum City skyline (Day).jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• As above, another "City Information Office" image. (ESkog)^(Talk) 18:22, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete: Some of these images were deleted back in 2009 as no evidence of permission; it was only after that that the user claimed they were sourced to the City Information Office. For example, see Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2009 July 10#File:Tagum City Hall Night.jpg.We have no evidence that they're actually from the City Info Office as claimed Diannaa (talk) 23:05, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Binuhat festival2.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• As above, another "City Information Office" image. (ESkog)^(Talk) 18:23, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete: Some of these images were deleted back in 2009 as no evidence of permission; it was only after that that the user claimed they were sourced to the City Information Office. For example, see Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2009 July 10#File:Tagum City Hall Night.jpg.We have no evidence that they're actually from the City Info Office as claimed Diannaa (talk) 23:05, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Binuhat festival1.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• As above, another "City Information Office" image. (ESkog)^(Talk) 18:24, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete: Some of these images were deleted back in 2009 as no evidence of permission; it was only after that that the user claimed they were sourced to the City Information Office. For example, see Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2009 July 10#File:Tagum City Hall Night.jpg.We have no evidence that they're actually from the City Info Office as claimed Diannaa (talk) 23:05, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pakaradjan festival1.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• As above, another "City Information Office" image. (ESkog)^(Talk) 18:24, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete: Some of these images were deleted back in 2009 as no evidence of permission; it was only after that that the user claimed they were sourced to the City Information Office. For example, see Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2009 July 10#File:Tagum City Hall Night.jpg.We have no evidence that they're actually from the City Info Office as claimed Diannaa (talk) 23:05, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tagumcity tricycles.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• As above, another "City Information Office" image. (ESkog)^(Talk) 18:25, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete: Some of these images were deleted back in 2009 as no evidence of permission; it was only after that that the user claimed they were sourced to the City Information Office. For example, see Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2009 July 10#File:Tagum City Hall Night.jpg.We have no evidence that they're actually from the City Info Office as claimed Diannaa (talk) 23:05, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:La filipina cemetery.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• As above, another "City Information Office" image. (ESkog)^(Talk) 18:26, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete: Some of these images were deleted back in 2009 as no evidence of permission; it was only after that that the user claimed they were sourced to the City Information Office. For example, see Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2009 July 10#File:Tagum City Hall Night.jpg.We have no evidence that they're actually from the City Info Office as claimed Diannaa (talk) 23:05, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tagum Integrated Overland Transport Terminal.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• As above, another "City Information Office" image. (ESkog)^(Talk) 18:26, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete: Some of these images were deleted back in 2009 as no evidence of permission; it was only after that that the user claimed they were sourced to the City Information Office. For example, see Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2009 July 10#File:Tagum City Hall Night.jpg.We have no evidence that they're actually from the City Info Office as claimed Diannaa (talk) 23:05, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tagum Cultural and Trade Center, Tagum, Davao del Norte (09-24-2008).jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• As above, another "City Information Office" image. (ESkog)^(Talk) 18:27, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete: Some of these images were deleted back in 2009 as no evidence of permission; it was only after that that the user claimed they were sourced to the City Information Office. For example, see Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2009 July 10#File:Tagum City Hall Night.jpg.We have no evidence that they're actually from the City Info Office as claimed Diannaa (talk) 23:05, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bfad tagum.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• As above, another "City Information Office" image. (ESkog)^(Talk) 18:27, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete: Some of these images were deleted back in 2009 as no evidence of permission; it was only after that that the user claimed they were sourced to the City Information Office. For example, see Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2009 July 10#File:Tagum City Hall Night.jpg.We have no evidence that they're actually from the City Info Office as claimed Diannaa (talk) 23:05, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:La filipina cemetery 2.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• As above, another "City Information Office" image. (ESkog)^(Talk) 18:27, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete: Some of these images were deleted back in 2009 as no evidence of permission; it was only after that that the user claimed they were sourced to the City Information Office. For example, see Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2009 July 10#File:Tagum City Hall Night.jpg.We have no evidence that they're actually from the City Info Office as claimed Diannaa (talk) 23:05, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tagum City street at night.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• As above, another "City Information Office" image. (ESkog)^(Talk) 18:27, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 01:02, 25 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Farm land.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Two files in one. One appears to be a copyvio from https://secure.flickr.com/photos/thyagaraju/131890264/ and both files have the same uploader so maybe both are copyvio.
  Stefan2 (talk) 21:27, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Whether any of these are kept, or not, this title should be salted with a placeholder image to make sure no random image from Commons shows through either, since it would be highly likely to be susceptible to random image change through random upload -- 65.94.76.126 (talk) 07:26, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • No. That would make it impossible to use
    Stefan2 (talk) 18:19, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply
    ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 01:02, 25 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Horn Island.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Two images in one. One of them lacks source and licence. For the other one, see
  Stefan2 (talk) 21:40, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:02, 25 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hussain.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Two copyvios in one:

1. http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showpost.php?s=1ab253ae5096729becf1526844f8cb6d&p=40360466&postcount=45
2. http://wayback.archive.org/web/20050403180908/http://www.ebaa.net/khaber/2005/03/30/khaber007.htm

Not sure how to best report these cases with multiple images in the history.

• Whether any of these are kept, or not, this title should be salted with a placeholder image to make sure no random image from Commons shows through either, since it would be highly likely to be susceptible to random image change through random upload -- 65.94.76.126 (talk) 07:26, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Deleted copy vio image of Dan Schneider; kept image of Mike Schneider. Diannaa (talk) 23:19, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Schneider.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Two files in one. One of them appears to be a copyvio: https://matthewmatt.wordpress.com/2008/01/02/my-interview-with-dan-schneider/
  Stefan2 (talk) 22:09, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Whether any of these are kept, or not, this title should be salted with a placeholder image to make sure no random image from Commons shows through either, since it would be highly likely to be susceptible to random image change through random upload -- 65.94.76.126 (talk) 07:26, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • No. That would make it impossible to use
    Stefan2 (talk) 18:18, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply
    ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by INeverCry (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:04, 12 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Osman Achmatowicz 2.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• It's safe to assume this is a photo of a photo (EXIF data says this was taken with an iPhone, but the subject died in 1988). There's no source or copyright information for the original photo. ALH (talk) 22:26, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Withdrawn Resolved on my user talk page. --

File:Northgate.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• File by
  Stefan2 (talk) 22:31, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Whether any of these are kept, or not, or renamed, this title should be salted with a placeholder image to make sure no random image from Commons shows through either, since it would be highly likely to be susceptible to random image change through random upload ; as this particular image is now on commons, the version on wikipedia should be deleted. -- 65.94.76.126 (talk) 07:25, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • No. That would make it impossible to use
    Stefan2 (talk) 18:16, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply
    ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by INeverCry (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 18:10, 25 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pak.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Two files in one. The one uploaded by
  Stefan2 (talk) 22:35, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Whether any of these are kept, or not, this title should be salted with a placeholder image to make sure no random image from Commons shows through either, since it would be highly likely to be susceptible to random image change through random upload -- 65.94.76.126 (talk) 07:25, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • No. That would make it impossible to use
    Stefan2 (talk) 18:11, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply
    ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by INeverCry (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 18:10, 25 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Shack.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Two images in one. The one by
  Stefan2 (talk) 22:41, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Whether any of these are kept, or not, this title should be salted with a placeholder image to make sure no random image from Commons shows through either, since it would be highly likely to be susceptible to random image change through random upload -- 65.94.76.126 (talk) 07:24, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by INeverCry (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 18:10, 25 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Palace.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Two files in one. The current revision seems to be a copyright violation.[5]
  Stefan2 (talk) 22:51, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Whether any of these are kept, or not, this title should be salted with a placeholder image to make sure no random image from Commons shows through either, since it would be highly likely to be susceptible to random image change through random upload -- 65.94.76.126 (talk) 07:23, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • No. That would make it impossible to use
    Stefan2 (talk) 18:12, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply
    ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by INeverCry (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 18:10, 25 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Table 1.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Three files in 1:

1. File by Lulutiki (talk · contribs) needs evidence of permission.
2. File by Dendriticcells08 (talk · contribs) needs source and licence.
3. File by
   Stefan2 (talk) 23:10, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply
   ]

• Comment the text as image is unreadable, and therefore useless, that should be deleted. -- 65.94.76.126 (talk) 07:23, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Whether any of these are kept, or not, this title should be salted with a placeholder image to make sure no random image from Commons shows through either, since it would be highly likely to be susceptible to random image change through random upload -- 65.94.76.126 (talk) 07:23, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • The file on Commons has been nominated for deletion as being out of scope. --
    Stefan2 (talk) 18:14, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply
    ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by INeverCry (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 18:10, 25 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Reception.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Two files in one. The first one by
  Stefan2 (talk) 23:16, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Whether any of these are kept, or not, this title should be salted with a placeholder image to make sure no random image from Commons shows through either, since it would be highly likely to be susceptible to random image change through random upload -- 65.94.76.126 (talk) 07:23, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • No. That would make it impossible to use
    Stefan2 (talk) 18:15, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply
    ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by INeverCry (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 18:10, 25 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sudi MallikarjunaGudi.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Two files in one. Photo by
  Stefan2 (talk) 23:21, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by INeverCry (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 18:10, 25 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Students.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Multiple files in one. File by
  Stefan2 (talk) 23:24, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.