Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2014 June 9

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

June 9

File:Salvatore Cuomo01.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 02:02, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Salvatore Cuomo01.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Hello there. I'm not sure this is the right place where to write but the picture was given me by Salvatore Cuomo. He told me via Facebook that i can be free to use any of his images for free. I recently wrote an article about him for the Newpaper China Times. So i can contact his corporation and ask about an email that proves what i'm saying. Would this be ok? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Torratte (talkcontribs) 14:35, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Photo of Raj Reddy

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Raj Reddy.JPG

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Wrong forum. The file is on Commons. Please nominate it for deletion there if you feel it is non-free. AnomieBOT 21:12, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Raj Reddy.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).
  • Please see the article history at Raj Reddy and the discussion at Talk:Raj Reddy. This article has a long history of people showing up and putting a professional-quality picture into it – sometimes claiming it is their own work. Photos with various slight variations of filename have been uploaded repeatedly. I think this is that same photo again. Perhaps I am not using the proper procedure for reporting this problem, as the file is on Wikimedia Commons rather than Wikipedia, and the "puf" template didn't seem to work properly when I added it to the file's page. Megalibgwilia (talk) 20:59, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.