Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2015 February 10

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 14:07, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:QPCS Front 03.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• File is released on behalf of someone else - that's fine, but needs an email to OTRS to ensure that all is in order. Deadstar (talk) 11:00, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: change to non-free. TLSuda (talk) 12:57, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Southmall Logo Your Community Centre.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

• This is a logo design... Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:50, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with {{
  dfu}} or list it at WP:Non-free content review. AnomieBOT⚡ 14:54, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 14:07, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:WZEP Jingle.ogg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• This is clearly a sound recording, and there appears to be no confirmation it's PD as claimed,,, Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:56, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 14:07, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:๊Ubonratchathanilogo.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Logo design is not uploaders. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:14, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:03, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Winston Churchill Crown Commemorative crown.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• This is a coin design, but there's no date given to establish if the Royal Mint may hold a copyright in the design. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:19, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

logs). I was completely unaware of this, you're welcome to delete the file, the date is 1965. Electrolux2 IMG (talk) 14:55, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Further to the above, http://www.royalmint.com/aboutus/policies-and-guidelines/advertising-guidelines - If you can get an OTRS then it can stay:) Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:11, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 14:07, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Vocea Ta elena gheorghe sample.wav (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Song clip, sufficiently over the length normally considered fair use. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:21, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 14:07, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Vic Reeves artwork on display at Saatchi Gallery London in 2010.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Derivative work. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:22, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 14:07, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:ThinkAgainLogo.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Threshold of originality concern... Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:23, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 14:07, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:AmnatPolyUnitedlogo2.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Logo design is not uploaders... Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:29, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 14:07, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:CAITHNESS SHINTY LOGO.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Logo design is not necessarily uploaders. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:37, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Converted to fair use. Diannaa (talk) 02:11, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:FC Voluntari logo.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Logo design not necessarily uploaders Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:48, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 14:07, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:New Turkish ID card .jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• This looks like a sample from an official source, not uploaders own work as claimed, In any event needs marking as sample or annonymising... Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:59, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

now it is fully my work.

• The photo is taken from here, it doesn't seem to be copyright-free. In any case it is not the actual ID card, it is the experimental card was used during the testing period. The card design has changed, as one can see in the official website. Once the ID's are distributed, a user can take a photo and upload it.--
  talk) 06:08, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply
  ]

• Nah mate i didint take it from that website. I took them as two parts and merged them, also edited them. I didint know that they were changed. Did the religion part deleted as they promised Şenel?
  kazekagetr 17:31, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply
  ]

• Delete Obviously not created by the uploader. Looks like something created by the Turkish government. --
  Stefan2 (talk) 12:46, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply
  ]

• I didn't mean it was from that website per se, but it was the promotional photo that the government distributed which was used in a number of similar websites. As to your question, here is the official website for the new IDs: https://www.ekds.gov.tr/ And here is the latest form of the IDs that they are starting to distribute: https://www.ekds.gov.tr/wp-content/uploads/2014/12/on_arka-764x230.png Yes, the religion part seems to be removed, much to my gratification. But unfortunately the Turkish government does not release its works copyright free, so we will have to wait until a user uploads a photo of his or her ID. Until then, we will have to delete this one.--
  talk) 04:21, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: change to non-free. TLSuda (talk) 12:58, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Soplica orzech laskowy.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• This is packaging artwork, the design of which is above TOO Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:08, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

So how does this violate copyright law? Do I need to change the status to non-free and add why for every packaging product? Another file I uploaded at the same time was flagged like this a day earlier, so I'll do what I did there to clarify that I am not the copyright owner for this (even though I should be, considering I'm the one who uploaded this, and as long as I'm not making money from the artwork then nothing is being borken). --

talk) 21:33, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply

]

This was flagged ( and you've subsequently updated it so this PUF is moot), because the packaging design contained non trival elements (namely the building and lower label artwork) which show elements of creative input. As your photo is soley and prominently of the a design incoporating those creative elements it constitutes a derivative work. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:29, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, so does that mean it can stay? Have I updated it correctly? I'd appreciate it if you could let me know, because then I could upload any other similar files I may have in the future in a similar manner to spare you and me the trouble. --

talk) 12:49, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply

]

• Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with {{
  dfu}} or list it at WP:Non-free content review. AnomieBOT⚡ 14:54, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 14:07, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Harith bin Ghazi al-Nadhari.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• This was tagged as no-permission but the tag was removed by the uploader, further this media appears to originate with a terrorist group, and may be subject to other restrictions. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 17:38, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Deleted becuase I thought you were joking. Asking 'permission' from an organisation with no intellectual property rights in any country is just stupid, and has now entered no.28 on my top 50 list of retarded things that I have heard or witnessed. Why would Commons need permission from an organisation that is internationally denounced, to use its content? There is no copy-right on such material! Where is the copy-right tag citing "All rights reserved, Al-Qaeda ltd."? If it existed (which it doesn't), it is not relevant! There is no copyright protection for Al-Qaeda! I have been fucking mind blown by Sfan00 IMG's sheer stupidity. Congratulations though on making it on the top 50 list man.--Ritsaiph (talk) 00:04, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.