September 28

What is this man shucking? Dismas|^(talk) 05:57, 28 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A coconut. HiLo48 (talk) 06:03, 28 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Dismas|^(talk) 10:29, 28 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved

Hello all, I'm an action-adventure/disaster novelist, and in my first novel there's the following scenario (WARNING: SPOILER ALERT!!!): An American husband-and-wife rescue team (the husband is a field surgeon in the US Army, whereas the wife is a pilot in the US Civil Air Patrol) is dispatched to save the life of a bear-mauling victim on an island in Hudson Bay, the surgeon having to parachute to the island because there's no place to land the plane (they are forced to use a light twin because of the extreme distance to the island, and because of the urgency of the mission). Unfortunately, the wind shifts while the surgeon is in midair, and he lands in the water, where he promptly gets tangled in his own parachute; but the pilot, seeing this, makes a low-level pass over him (at an altitude of 100 feet and an airspeed just above stall) and drops him a life preserver, saving him from drowning (and barely avoiding a radio tower on the island during the pull-out). My question is: Does this make her eligible for the Lifesaving Medal, and if so, is she eligible for the gold or the silver medal? Thanks in advance! 24.23.196.85 (talk) 22:45, 28 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The article says you need to make "extraordinary effort" to earn the awards. That is, of course, purely at the descretion of the Coast Guard Commandant who awards the medals, but from your description I don't think it qualifies. If the surgeon makes it to the island and saves the bear victim, he would be the more likely recipient unless he was on active duty at the time, in which case he would probably get an Army award instead (from my reading of the article anyway). RudolfRed (talk) 23:28, 28 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

(sorry, ec. Adding anyways because has slightly more info) The Silver Lifesaving Medal is awarded by the commandant of the U.S. Coast Guard to any person who rescues or endeavors to rescue any other person from drowning, shipwreck or other perils of the water. If the rescue or attempted rescue evidences such extraordinary effort as to merit recognition, the medal shall be silver. [1]

The Gold Lifesaving Medal is awarded by the Commandant of the Coast Guard to any person who rescues, or endeavors to rescue, any other person from drowning, shipwreck, or other peril of the water. To merit the award of the Gold Lifesaving Medal, the rescue must be made at the risk to one’s own life and show extreme heroic daring. [2]

If still in doubt (for example whether a rescue in waters outside the US is eligible), you could always ask the coast guard directly. 184.147.120.88 (talk) 23:31, 28 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

OK, it looks like two contradictory opinions here. Let's see if I can apply the criteria...

• American victims and/or rescuers and/or rescue in American waters: The rescue takes place in foreign waters, but both the rescuer and the victim (who is himself a rescue worker) are Americans -- so no problems on that count;
• Rescue from drowning, shipwreck or other perils of the water: Hell yes!
• Extraordinary effort, risk to own life and/or extreme heroic daring: I'd say that slow flight at extremely low altitude is
  a pretty dangerous thing to do
  , especially if you're also flying toward an obstruction that you might not clear in time, and if you must leave the cockpit while doing this in order to throw the lifesaver (as is the case here). I definitely wouldn't call it "extreme heroic daring", but as far as whether it poses sufficient risk to the pilot's life and/or sufficiently extraordinary effort on her part to qualify her for the medal -- I don't know.

24.23.196.85 (talk) 06:06, 29 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe I'm understanding your synopsis wrong, but you'll need to explain why Americans would intervene in a rescue on Canadian territory thousands of miles from the nearest U.S. base. Also, your rescuer will die from hypothermia before a life saver can do him any good... Then again, if Canadian rescuers had been called, they probably would have had the proper equipment on hand to effect the rescue, hence no story. --Xuxl (talk) 12:59, 29 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The bear-mauling victim is an American citizen. And the Canadians cannot help because of severe weather conditions, because doing so would violate ALPA regulations. As far as hypothermia is concerned,

this is not always the case. 24.23.196.85 (talk) 22:15, 29 September 2013 (UTC)[reply

]

(ec) In addition to the problems noted before about this being Canadian territory there are a few more. The Beechcraft Queen Air is not noted as an aircraft people jump out of but it can be done. You would need to find out how easy the door, File:Kunikaze at GSI.JPG, would be to open on one that isn't set up for skydiving. It's not clear that the CAP have any Queen Air. It would be more logical to use a float equipped de Havilland Canada DHC-6 Twin Otter that could fly the victim out. Oh, just remembered the Queen is a piston not a turbo and Avgas is not that easy to get in the remote places these days. There is also a good possibility that a Canadian Coast Guard ship may be in the area. Finally, given the time of year this is taking place, summer because of the open water, they will probably be quite a few ships belonging to Nunavut Eastern Arctic Shipping in the area as well. It's not a very likely scenario. Why not consider moving the action to somewhere else that the US would be operating in like the Alaskan part of the Beaufort Sea. If the weather conditions are that bad then the US aircraft is not going to be going any place either. If the Air Line Pilots Association, International would ground the Canadian pilots then it would ground the US pilots as well. What sort of weather conditions in the middle of summer were you thinking of? CambridgeBayWeather (talk) 22:36, 29 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Just realised that ALPA is a bargaining unit and would not necessarily have regulations that govern this. CambridgeBayWeather (talk) 22:38, 29 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

OK, one point at a time:

• It's not clear that the CAP have any Queen Air. -- The a/c in question is actually owned by a private air-courier company and is on loan to the CAP for this mission -- so no problem there.
• It would be more logical to use a float equipped
  polynias
  (one of which almost claims the hapless parachutist's life) -- which also means no ships near the island because of the ice floes.
• Oh, just remembered the Queen is a piston not a turbo and
  Duluth and flying nonstop to the objective, so this is not a factor (in fact, this is an additional factor, besides the urgency of the mission, for my heroine deciding not to refuel at Fort Severn
  ) -- and after arriving at the destination, the plane could wait for a while until enough fuel can be obtained to fly back out (this, of course, entails economic losses to the company, but it does not imperil the mission).
• There is also a good possibility that a Canadian Coast Guard ship may be in the area. Finally, given the time of year this is taking place, summer because of the open water, they will probably be quite a few ships belonging to Nunavut Eastern Arctic Shipping in the area as well. -- See above re. the mission taking place during the spring breakup.
• It's not a very likely scenario. -- The scenario was based in part on an actual rescue mission (although it took place in Russia, not Canada, and at a time when helicopters were not yet in common use -- hence the need for parachuting).
• Why not consider moving the action to somewhere else that the US would be operating in like the Alaskan part of the Beaufort Sea. -- Same reason why I denied my characters the use of a King Air -- because I'm a cruel, sadistic monster like all action/suspense writers, so I wanted them running on fumes! (Besides, I'm not aware of any islands in the Alaskan part of the Beaufort Sea -- are you?)
• If the Air Line Pilots Association, International would ground the Canadian pilots then it would ground the US pilots as well. -- Only if the US pilots were part of the trade union (which they're not, in this case). In general, trade unions have much more power over individual employees in Canada (and Europe) than they do in the USA -- so it may well be that the (union, closed-shop) Canadian pilots decide not to risk potential legal complications, whereas the (non-union) US pilots decide to go ahead regardless (what can the union do to them if they're not part of it, anyway???)
• What sort of weather conditions in the middle of summer were you thinking of? -- Prevailing weather conditions for the mission: Polar cyclone, moderate to heavy rain and snow, strong gusty winds, moderate icing;
  cloud ceiling 300 feet; Ivujivik
  (alternate airfield) is completely socked in, 30-knot crosswinds gusting 40, vis. <1/2 mile in blowing snow, cloud ceiling 200 feet. (How's THAT for a dicey landing, especially when running out of gas as well?)

24.23.196.85 (talk) 00:55, 1 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]