Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Jfdwolff

User:Jfdwolff

He has made about 2000 (I believe) edits, many on medicinal topics, and has shown himself to be a conscientious and good contributor. Meelar 23:20, 3 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]

I'm honoured to accept.
JFW | T@lk 23:24, 3 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]

Support:

1. Meelar
2. Jwrosenzweig 23:27, 3 May 2004 (UTC) (Man, nominations are coming out of the woodwork -- is this an unusual trend, or just a sign that we're finally recognizing that many, many editors do outstanding work here -- Jfdwolff not least of them! -- and we're too slow to respond?)[reply]
   • Something in the air, I suppose ;) Meelar 23:30, 3 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]
3. Support. He's done some great work organising the
   Wikipedia:WikiProject Clinical medicine. Angela.
   23:34, May 3, 2004 (UTC)
4. Bummer, I wanted to nominate him myself. Support. Danny 23:37, 3 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]
5. Tuf-Kat 00:05, May 4, 2004 (UTC)
6. 172 02:03, 4 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]
7. Cecropia 02:19, 4 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]
8. Cribcage 03:11, 4 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]
9. GrazingshipIV 03:35, May 4, 2004 (UTC)
10. Warofdreams 18:37, 4 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]
11. User:Zanimum
12. Graham  :) | Talk 23:05, 5 May 2004 (UTC)[reply
    ]
13. PFHLai 14:31, 2004 May 6 (UTC)
14. jengod 19:57, May 7, 2004 (UTC)
15. We need more
    Wikidocs -- Chris 73 | Talk 09:07, 8 May 2004 (UTC)[reply
    ]
16. Lst27 23:25, 8 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]
17. BCorr|Брайен 00:30, May 9, 2004 (UTC)
18. James F. (talk) 00:44, 9 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]
19. Just looking at the number of edits does not do Jfdwolff justice, as he tends to make large edits rather than trivial ones. A solid record of contributions. Andrewa 01:38, 9 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose

1. Not enough edits yet, IMHO. Therefore, not enough experience yet, IMHO. Kingturtle 01:10, 7 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]

   Note: The user has 1326 edits according to Wikipedia:List of Wikipedians by number of edits from April 24, 2004 -- Chris 73 | Talk 09:07, 8 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]

   Note: That is about 2/5s the number of edits I think are necessary before considering a candidate. Kingturtle 22:05, 8 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]

   Hmm. So I think Kingturtle sets the threshold at about 3000. According to the list (referred to above), about 166 Wikipedians fulfil your criterion (I have 3544 with rank 133, so I barely made the cut). We have about 224 administrators. Do the maths. (Not a vote) -- Kaihsu 22:36, 2004 May 8 (UTC)

   Heavens. 3k edits? I have only 2k5 edits (less, probably), and when made a sysop, 11 months ago, I had... less. Just over 500, I think. Does this mean I should be de-sysop'ed, in your opinion? ;-) -- James F. (talk) 00:44, 9 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral:

1. Never heard of em. anthony (see warning)

   Take the time to review Jfdwolff's edit history. Kingturtle 00:24, 7 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]