Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Natalya

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a successful request for adminship. Please do not modify it.

Natalya

Final (95/2/2) ending 19:31, 2 June 2006 (UTC)

Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here: I am truly honored to accept this nomination. -- Natalya 17:27, 26 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Support

1. Beat the nominator support Looks good to me!--digital_me^(t/c) 17:35, 26 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
2. Nominator was busy support Highway ^{Rainbow Sneakers} 17:36, 26 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
3. Wanted to beat the nominator, but got too tied up Support Excellent editor. --Srikeit^{(talk ¦ ✉)} 17:52, 26 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
4. Support Appears to be a solid editor. Use of edit summaries to describe
   MoS:DP edits seems to communicate an awareness of and attention to Wikipedia's editing guidelines. Articulate answers to questions below. -- backburner001 17:57, 26 May 2006 (UTC)[reply
   ]
5. Support solid contributor, very reasonable. older ≠ wiser 17:59, 26 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
6. Support, certainly. Sarge Baldy 18:22, 26 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
7. Support, of course! haz (user talk) 18:42, 26 May 2006
8. Very Strong Support. Natalya is one of the friendliest users on Wikipedia. He She has a deep understanding of Wikipedia policy, guidelines, and customs, as evidenced by his her frequent contributions to the new contributors' help page. --TantalumTelluride 19:03, 26 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

   No offence, but Natalya is a girl. Highway ^{Rainbow Sneakers} 19:06, 26 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

   Yep - tis true! -- Natalya 19:08, 26 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

   Um, I knew that. I just wanted to make sure you were paying attention. --TantalumTelluride 19:25, 26 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

   (please rollover following image)-DictatorWikipedia should be a totalitarian state with me in command!GangstaEB-12:51, 27 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

9. Support. Have seen her work around, think she deserves it. (and yes, girls/women at wikipeida are often referred to as he, o well)-- Kim van der Linde ^{at venus} 19:18, 26 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
10. Support. The answers given to the questions below are very good. Rje 19:20, 26 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
11. Support very civil and experienced. Also very fun to talk to if the subject is ginormous puffins. :P Master of Puppets ^{That's hot.} 19:53, 26 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
12. Support per good answers to questions below and good work in various cleanup tasks. The informal mediation at the Good Articles page shows a very positive attitude and an ability to help people reach consensus. --Elkman 19:55, 26 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
13. Support never seen this user, but I like the name...  Grue  20:23, 26 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
14. --Gangsta-Easter-Bunny 20:25, 26 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

    There is a consensus developing that voting icons should be kept off RfAs. See talk page. Stephen B Streater 09:06, 28 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

15. Support; great answers and always a good user. smurrayinchester ^(Talk) 20:56, 26 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
16. Support before it officially becomes a pile-on. Great work. I look forward to meeting you over on
    Petros471 21:06, 26 May 2006 (UTC)[reply
    ]
17. The nominator said "active since January 2006", but I've seen Natalya around before that. Easy support. Redux 21:21, 26 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
18. Strong Support on WHEELS!!! Friendly user. Will be an asset to the project. Case Closed. --D-Day ^{on WHEELS!!!} 21:23, 26 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
19. Strongest possible support. Natalya is an extremely courteous Wikipedian, active on RC patrol, and the
    mediation at WP:GAN left me completely impressed. She has done a bulk of the boring, repetitive and thankless work of disambiguating pages, and has good contributions to the article namespace. I don't have any reservations as to her preparedness for the position. Titoxd^{(?!? - help us)} 21:31, 26 May 2006 (UTC)[reply
    ]
20. Support. Looks good to me. Great contributor to the whole Wikipedia community and would benefit being admin. G.He 21:57, 26 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
21. Support per G.He. —Khoikhoi
22. Strong support. I was thinking of nominating her myself... --Tone 22:59, 26 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
23. Support. Great user. DarthVader 23:35, 26 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
24. Merovingian {T C @} 00:52, 27 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
25. Support.Liked answers to questions.. :) Dlohcierekim 01:16, 27 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
26. Support, has made excellent contributions to disambiguation pages and MoS:DAB discussions. --Muchness 01:31, 27 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
27. Support Good user, good answers to questions. Garion96 ^(talk) 02:05, 27 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
28. Support A great user. --Siva1979^{Talk to me} 02:32, 27 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
29. Support - meets my standards -- Tawker 02:34, 27 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
30. Support. Quick study, well-rounded, shows a particular aptitude for communication. RadioKirk talk to me 02:53, 27 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
31. Support, great user, answers are excellent, she isn't one?? --
    e Ong 03:00, 27 May 2006 (UTC)[reply
    ]
32. Robert 03:34, 27 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
33. Support, definitely. Sango123 (e) 04:11, 27 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
34. Support!! A great team-player and a positive force everywhere she goes. Kukini 04:39, 27 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
35. Support. A little low on edits, perhaps, but they do appear to be of good quality. As a huge plus, she appears to be a tireless contributer to one of the less-sexy aspects of editing (to some, at least). Although i have no personal experience of interaction with her, she seems like a solid candidate. Thats good enough for me. Rockpocket ^-talk- 06:54, 27 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
36. Support. Calm, rational editor with a gift for putting out flames and smoothing out troubles. Good answers to questions below. The extra buttons would be well used and used well by her. ➨
    DVΞRS≡ 11:02, 27 May 2006 (UTC)[reply
    ]
37. Support: As someone who spreads goodwill throughout WP, it looks like she will be an asset as an Admin. Stephen B Streater 11:11, 27 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
38. Support Without reservation, Natalya is a supurb admin candidate (there's been a few on RfA of late hasnt there?) Strong support indeed. -- Banez 12:29, 27 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
39. Support--Jusjih 14:19, 27 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
40. Support looks good. ShortJason 14:44, 27 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
41. Weak support changed from neutral. Computerjoe's talk 15:59, 27 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
42. I thought she was already an admin! Civil, dedicated, I'm sure she would handle tough situations very well. I liked her answers too, they back up her great record.-- The ikiroid  16:18, 27 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
43. Enthusiastic Support. Tons of good edits, and the answers to the questions clinch it. Clearly a thoughtful asset to Wikipedia. Pass her a mop. --HughCharlesParker (talk - contribs) 16:21, 27 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
44. Support The Gerg 16:29, 27 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
45. Support --Jay(Reply) 17:34, 27 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
46. Strong support - she has some very good people skills, enabling her to handle conflicts very well and deflating them before they get a chance to heat up. That, and the fact that I think she's been 'around' enough to get a good grasp on policy and the places and people to go to if she has dobuts, makes me very confident to support her. --JoanneB 17:53, 27 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
47. Support Natalya is a extremely good contributor, with lots of good edits to her credit. She has also displayed calm and level headedness. With such peerless qualities, she deserves to be an admin. Jordy 18:00, 27 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
48. Plain old support - she deserves it. Phaedriel ♥ tell me - 18:18, 27 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
49. Support. Meant to do this last night. Has always been polite and insightful on talk. - Samsara (talk • contribs) 20:44, 27 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
50. Superfragilisticexpialidocious support - Diabolical (Heh heh!) Excellent editor. Kilo-Lima|^(talk) 20:50, 27 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
51. Support
    AmiDaniel (talk) 22:04, 27 May 2006 (UTC)[reply
    ]
52. Strong support - she is really, really lovely. She kind of has this aura of civility, good practice and niceness that you don't get often. She's always patient, considerate, helpful and friendly to everyone and makes a much better Esperanzian than I am or ever will be. She really does put the rest of us to shame. Now, we're going to corrupt her by handing her the AdminPowers^TM. How awful of us. --Celestianpower ^háblame 22:19, 27 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
53. Well, why the fuck not? robchurch | talk 01:45, 28 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
54. Support Looks like an excellent user. Meets my specifications, and I would trust with admin tools. ~Linuxerist
    L/T 02:30, 28 May 2006 (UTC)[reply
    ]
55. Support. I only have positive things to say about this user. RyanGerbil10 02:40, 28 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
56. ^{wat's sup} 03:38, 28 May 2006 (UTC)[reply
    ]
57. Tim Rhymeless (Er...let's shimmy) 04:24, 28 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
58. Support Great user, excellent potential for admin, good luck! gidonb 04:27, 28 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
59. Support. Looks like a good candidate. Nephron  T|C 04:42, 28 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
60. Oh yes please! Big fan.;-) —Encephalon 05:06, 28 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
61. Strong support. What is there to say? She'll make a great one.
    EWS23 | (Leave me a message!) 05:18, 28 May 2006 (UTC)[reply
    ]
62. Support avec plaisire -
    talk/contribs/email 06:03, 28 May 2006 (UTC)[reply
    ]
63. Strong Support I've seen only good things from this user. Friendly and committed to the project. The Halo (talk) 10:40, 28 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
64. Happy-Birthday-why-isn't-she-yet?-support!
    13 ^{T C} 14:16, 28 May 2006 (UTC)[reply
    ]
65. Support Captainj 14:51, 28 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
66. --ⁿɡ͡b
    talk 15:02, 28 May 2006 (UTC)[reply
    ]
67. Support OMIGAWDAGURL- I mean... Looks like an excellent editor. *cough* Yes... :) Should make for a great admin. Staxringold 17:50, 28 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
68. Support - This lady owns the Esperanza alert page (uh, in a good way). Encouraging and helpful to others. She'll do well with admin tools. Tijuana Brass^E@ 18:39, 28 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
69. Support of course.Blnguyen | Have your say!!! 01:20, 29 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
70. Super strong suppport. Incredible asset and will make good use of the tools. .:.Jareth.:. ^babelfish 02:17, 29 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
71. Support Does a responsible all round job, including detailed attention to e.g. disambiguation link repair Tyrenius 02:30, 29 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
72. --GeorgeMoney ^T·C 05:46, 29 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
73. Per Robchurch... among others. More candidates like this one please!™ Support ++Lar: t/c 06:05, 29 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
74. Support. -
    talk + 06:10, 29 May 2006 (UTC)[reply
    ]
75. Support: --Ahonc (Talk) 08:48, 29 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
76. Support--blue520 09:06, 29 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
77. Support – will make a great administrator – Gurch 10:27, 29 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
78. Support
    X 14:12, 29 May 2006 (UTC)[reply
    ]
79. Support: --Bhadani 16:35, 29 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
80. Support You've got the respect of some hard-to-please people behind you already. My standards are pretty light in comparison. ~Kylu (u|t) 00:22, 30 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
81. Support, I've seen good and friendly work. +sj + 03:40, 30 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
82. Support Nobleeagle (Talk) 05:19, 30 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
83. Piling On Support excellent editor, well worthy of mopping up MLA 09:33, 30 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
84. Support! Very friendly person. --Fang Aili ^talk 13:09, 30 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
85. Support Lapinmies 18:22, 30 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
86. Support per nom. Royboycrashfan 20:40, 30 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
87. Support: good editor. Jonathunder 20:47, 30 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
88. Support Joe I 22:04, 30 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
89. Support the lemon picture on her user page sold me (just kidding; good candidate) — ßottesiηi ^(talk) 23:48, 30 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
90. Support per RjE. Kalani ^[talk] 09:00, 31 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
91. Big green plus sign image. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 21:26, 31 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
92. Support - Calm, cool and collected. Knows how to calm down nasty Esperanzans when necessary. --Richard 06:30, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
93. Support I thought she was already (a great) admin. --Zoz (t) 13:02, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
94. Support. Not a lot of edits, but well-rounded. --
    talk - email) 14:33, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply
    ]

    Weak Support enough edits, but not enough expreience for a full support. The Gerg 21:05, 1 June 2006 (UTC) Note Duplicate vote. Srikeit^{(talk ¦ ✉)} 03:36, 2 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

95. Extremely Strong Support Natalya is an extremely friendly member. She made me decide not to leave this project. We need admins who bind the Wikipedian community together. Without the wikipedia community, this project would be doomed. Anonymous_anonymous_Have a Nice Day 12:54, 2 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Total edits	2482
Distinct pages edited	1324
Average edits/page	1.875
First edit	11:36, 19 December 2004
	
(main)	1086
Talk	107
User	124
User talk	438
Image	8
Template	4
Template talk	3
Category	5
Wikipedia	437
Wikipedia talk	270