Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Snoutwood

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a successful request for adminship. Please do not modify it.

Snoutwood

Final (64/0/0) ended 22:33, 4 May 2006 (UTC)

I absolutely insist on co-nominating. —Encephalon 08:26, 28 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here: I gratefully and heartily accept.

(talk) 22:25, 27 April 2006 (UTC)[reply

]

1. I beat the nom support! Experienced and balanced editor. _-M ^o P-_ 22:56, 27 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
2. Another beat the nom support Moe ε 22:58, 27 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
3. Hey oy. I really shouldn't have to do this, it's implied... but eh, if that's what you're after.--
   ^(talk?) 23:00, 27 April 2006 (UTC)[reply
   ]
4. Support Would definitely make a good admin. Pegasus1138^{Talk | Contribs | Email} ---- 23:24, 27 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
5. Support as per all comments above. --
   ets501^{talk • contribs} 23:29, 27 April 2006 (UTC)[reply
   ]
6. Strong Support Editor is an insightful, generally spectacular WPian, for whom I have the highest respect. Xoloz 00:00, 28 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
7. Support. Will make a great admin. DarthVader 00:16, 28 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
8. Support - Richardcavell 00:41, 28 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
9. Stop with the damn cite.php in RfAs, it's annoying. --Rory096_(block) 01:06, 28 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
10. Support, well rounded user and vandalism reverter, I particularly liked his work on
    (talk) 01:20, 28 April 2006 (UTC)[reply
    ]
11. Support - meets my standards -- Tawker 01:37, 28 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
12. Support wiz plezher -
    talk/contribs/email 01:38, 28 April 2006 (UTC)[reply
    ]
13. Strong Support although a bit too wedded to his edits if you ask me ... Eusebeus 02:21, 28 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
14. Support
    Betacommand 02:34, 28 April 2006 (UTC)[reply
    ]
15. Strong Support Rama's Arrow 03:30, 28 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
16. Support Joe I 03:52, 28 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
17. Support I like the answers to the questions. Would be a great asset with the mop.--Kungfu Adam ^(talk) 03:56, 28 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
18. Support, excellent user, should be an excellent admin. Titoxd^{(?!? - help us)} 05:34, 28 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
19. Support. Not likely to abuse the tools. Kimchi.sg | talk 06:51, 28 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
20. Support--Jusjih 08:00, 28 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
21. Edit conflict Support, of course. -
    Mailer Diablo 08:03, 28 April 2006 (UTC)[reply
    ]
22. Very strong support. Snoutwood is quite simply the gold standard. Sean's nomination has pre-empted a 5 para essay from this user, but if the pleasure of nominating Snouty is not to be mine, I'm thankful, at least, to be able to lend my full support to this first among Wikipedians. —Encephalon 08:26, 28 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
23. Support Sandy 11:15, 28 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
24. Can't see why not. Well-rounded user. Redux 12:30, 28 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
25. Support per nom and interest in uncommon admin tasks (per question #1). As far as the RfC in question #3, Snoutwood's statement may have been a little harsh, but it did bring up some issues with deletion at the time. That led up to development of the {{
    Elkman - ^(talk) 13:37, 28 April 2006 (UTC)[reply
    ]
26. Support per
    Wynaut! Stifle (talk) 13:58, 28 April 2006 (UTC)[reply
    ]
27. Support Will be a great admin. --Siva1979^{Talk to me} 16:32, 28 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
28. Support - I've had nothing but pleasant encounters with him. --Cyde Weys 16:57, 28 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
29. Support meets all of my numerical and behavioral standards. I previously expressed an interest in nominating him myself. — Apr. 28, '06 [18:34] <freakofnur_xture|talk>
30. Support. He was civil to me when I made an unintentionaly angering edit, and looking through his archives, his hawk eye on Ansel Adams is always great to see. Good luck! -Mysekurity ^[m!] 21:07, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
31. Support. With pleasure. This user has done some good janitorial work, reversions of vandalism and is polite and cool. --Knucmo2 21:50, 28 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
32. Support Familiar name
    ^{wat's sup} 00:40, 29 April 2006 (UTC)[reply
    ]
33. Support, excellent candidate Deizio 00:49, 29 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
34. Support, all around good great user. Royboycrashfan 01:03, 29 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
35. Support per nom Bucketsofg ✐ 02:40, 29 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
36. Support, he's great. --
    e Ong 04:03, 29 April 2006 (UTC)[reply
    ]
37. Support A very civilised wikipedian, I had an accidently mixup with him back in October or so when he was Blackcap about Kate's tool, I wrote him a message that accidently could be taken to be mean if seen in textual form solely but he realized that I was just kidding with him and he was really nice about it. He's a great person and a wonderful editor, I look forward to seeing him as an admin. - Patman2648 06:30, 29 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
38. Support. Great mainspace editor, unlikely to abuse tools.
    Talk?) 07:38, 29 April 2006 (UTC)[reply
    ]
39. Support why not? Computerjoe's talk 14:15, 29 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
40. Support. Two thumbs up. (^'-')^ Covington 22:52, 29 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
41. Support --Jay(Reply) 22:56, 29 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
42. Support I really did think he was one....
    Rx StrangeLove 06:39, 30 April 2006 (UTC)[reply
    ]
43. Support: --Bhadani 12:15, 30 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
44. Support Per nom Angus McLellan (Talk) 16:03, 30 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
45. Support.
    Thunderbrand 16:17, 30 April 2006 (UTC)[reply
    ]
46. Support No reason why not. Davewild 16:55, 30 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
47. Support General Eisenhower 17:36, 30 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
48. Support Per nom OSU80 17:58, 30 April 2006 (UTC) [reply]
49. Support. -- MarcoTolo 18:38, 30 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
50. Lesbian pile-on Support per nom (P.S. Your RfA ends on the same day as mine.. COINCIDENCE).
    T/_C\^@ 22:30, 30 April 2006 (UTC)[reply
    ]
51. Support Couldn't say otherwise! ~Linuxerist
    L/T 00:47, 1 May 2006 (UTC)[reply
    ]
52. Support per nom. --Arnzy (Talk) 03:14, 1 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
53. Support. Only just come across this user for the first time at
    Petros471 09:31, 1 May 2006 (UTC)[reply
    ]
54. Support See no reason to oppose.--MONGO 02:41, 2 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
55. Of course... Support ++Lar: t/c 04:20, 2 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
56. Snoutwood make a great administrator. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 04:52, 2 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
57. Yes, I snoutwood this user too. JIP | Talk 07:34, 2 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
58. Support No hesitation, quality contributor. --Cactus.man ✍ 09:57, 3 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
59. Support Well, duh! Primate^#101 11:16, 3 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
60. Support Jared W 16:56, 3 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
61. Unlikely to abuse admin tools. Christopher Parham (talk) 17:12, 3 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
62. Support - good user.
    review me 04:11, 4 May 2006 (UTC)[reply
    ]
63. Support
    Talk) 13:23, 4 May 2006 (UTC)[reply
    ]
64. Support. Gosh, hope I didn't miss the deadline. --
    Darth Deskana (talk page) 22:49, 4 May 2006 (UTC)[reply
    ]

Total edits 4559
Distinct pages edited 2240
Average edits/page 2.035
First edit 03:20, 24 July 2005
 
(main) 1380
Talk 203
User 387
User talk 1217
Image 15
Image talk 7
MediaWiki talk 27
Template 56
Template talk 73
Help 5
Help talk 3
Category 34
Category talk 13
Wikipedia 887
Wikipedia talk 252