Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/98E

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

98E (January 2008)

I can't help but see a striking similarity between the editing habits of banned User:98E and the currently active User:Rappingwonders. This report is not meant to be an "attack" on Rappingwonders but it's to ensure 98E isn't evading a ban. The bold headings state the similar editing patterns. Spellcast (talk) 02:25, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Uploading images of these musicians and their song covers

T-Pain

Akon

50 Cent:

If it's a picture of the musician, they add a caption in this format: "<artist name> performing".

  • From User:98E: [1]

Claiming to have taken questionably free images

Requesting images be resized to 150px: [7], [8]

Editing images using MS Paint: [9], [10]

Creating or editing categories by adding a fair-use image gallery

Both revert the first time someone adds a "__nogallery__" tag to nonfree image categories.[11], [12]

Both know a "__nogallery__" tag is added to categories if all images are nonfree.[13], [14]

Both say it's ok to remove the "__nogallery__" tag if one image is free.[15], [16]

Similar userpages

  • Both claim to be born in 1987.[17], [18]

Similar style of headings and sentences in userpage

  • From User:98E: "Free use images I like"[25]
  • From User:Rappingwonders: "Songs I think should be on NOW 27" or "Articles about albums or singles I've helped by uploading their cover image or uploading a lower resolution cover",[26]
  • From User:Super48 (sock of 98E): "Above is a list of pages I've reverted in the last 24 hours, and the time of reverting".[27]

Continually creating similar-style redirects

  • From User:98E: 1, 2, 3, 4.
  • From User:Rappingwonders: 1, 2, 3, 4.

Possible vandalism

User:98E was obviously disruptive. One of his suspected socks, User:PitOfBristol1973, edited Lindsay Lohan with a false edit summary. This could be compared to these series of diffs by User:RappingWonders on Sean Kingston (both could've purposely used a false edit summary to add possible vandalism).

Regarding RappingWonders' first edits, it's unusual for a newbie to be familiar with adding fair-use rationales. I don't want to accuse an unrelated person but the last thing we want is 98E to be active. Spellcast (talk) 02:25, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Possible verging on
t 05:34, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply
]
If there's no other comments, I'll block the likely sock. I can give more evidence if anyone wants, but I think those diffs are adequate enough. Especially with the ISP and location, this can't be a massive coincidence from two unrelated people. Spellcast (talk) 15:17, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I've blocked the account. I would've waited longer but another user tagged Rappingwonders' user page with a sock tag. He still would've been blocked either way. Spellcast (talk) 15:46, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]


If you are creating a new request about this user, please add it to the top of the page, above this notice. Don't forget to add
{{Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/98E}}
to the checkuser page here. Previous requests (shown below), and this box, will be automatically hidden on Requests for checkuser (but will still appear here).
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.


98E

  • Code letter: F

I see many similarities between the edits made by this person and those done by 98E and his various sockpuppets. Tweeks Coffee 13:49, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Additional information needed where is the relevant ArbCom case? --ST47Talk 13:51, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    • My apologies, this should be an "F" code, I changed it to reflect that. Tweeks Coffee 14:07, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
      •  Additional information needed We need diffs from the edit similarities. ~ Wikihermit 20:15, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

 Unlikely

Voice-of-All 04:28, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply
]


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.
Subsequent requests related to this user should be made
above, in a new section.