Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Anoshirawan

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
If you are creating a new request about this user, please add it to the top of the page, above this notice. Don't forget to add
{{Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Anoshirawan}}
to the checkuser page here. Previous requests (shown below), and this box, will be automatically hidden on Requests for checkuser (but will still appear here).
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.

Anoshirawan (Third)

 Confirmed

 Stale

-- Avi (talk) 05:05, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Clerk note: Šāhzādé blocked and tagged. Kingturtle (talk) 13:03, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
 Clerk note: Please do NOT archive yet. It is related to Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Tajik, where the subject User:Tajik is under 1RR restriction and evidences from that CU case suggests that Tajik broke the ArbCom's restriction. OhanaUnitedTalk page 21:07, 11 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

See results of Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Tajik, can archive now. RlevseTalk 19:15, 20 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.
Subsequent requests related to this user should be made
above, in a new section.



If you are creating a new request about this user, please add it to the top of the page, above this notice. Don't forget to add
{{Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Anoshirawan}}
to the checkuser page here. Previous requests (shown below), and this box, will be automatically hidden on Requests for checkuser (but will still appear here).
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.

Anoshirawan

Anoshirawan used the above alias names to commit vote fraud, and the annon IPs (from Germany) to conceal his identity at the same articles where he was involved in edit-wars with others. Anoshirawan is very easy to recognize because of his level of English writing. He always talks about Pashtuns being Afghans, and always helping the bannd editor Beh-nam in edit-wars, disputes, and conseses. The above alias names, IPs and Anoshirawan have the same exact POVs. All of the above names and IPs are him with no doubts, and if you need further information explain and I will provide it. Thanks,--Zimbobman (talk) 01:52, 25 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Rejected - NisarKand socking again and trolling on my talk page. Blocked. Note to NisarKand, Beh-nam and others. File vexatious checkuser cases and you and all your socks are just as likely to be blocked as anyone else - Alison 02:26, 25 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]


If you are creating a new request about this user, please add it to the top of the page, above this notice. Don't forget to add
{{Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Anoshirawan}}
to the checkuser page here. Previous requests (shown below), and this box, will be automatically hidden on Requests for checkuser (but will still appear here).
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Khaled_Hosseini&diff=176732773&oldid=176669493 http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Khaled_Hosseini&diff=177838167&oldid=177625292 http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Khaled_Hosseini&diff=178442599&oldid=178252197 http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Khaled_Hosseini&diff=178613977&oldid=178520101 http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Khaled_Hosseini&diff=178883546&oldid=178881463 http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Khaled_Hosseini&diff=178891580&oldid=178891203

This is really just a single instance of this user's disruptiveness on Wikipedia. Despite an overwhelming majority of editors seeing things a certain way and providing valid sources, he continues to revert all changes and restoring his own controversial edits. This behavior goes beyond just one article. Aquabee (talk) 05:34, 19 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

talk · contribs
)
information Note: - the person filing this report, Aquabee (talk · contribs) is the indefblocked editor Khampalak (talk · contribs)
- Alison 19:23, 19 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
 Clerk note: Just to be clear, Alison, TheNewPianist and Aquabee should both be blocked as confirmed, right? -JodyB talk 19:43, 19 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Both of them are  Confirmed as being socks of blocked/banned editors.Anoshirawan (talk · contribs) is Red X Unrelated. I've no comment as to what happens next but would like to point out that I am more than aware that User:Beh-nam has been filing vexatious cases here of late. He stands to be blocked just as readily as those he's complaining about! - Alison 19:58, 19 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, the two were blocked indef by me. User:Beh-nam is already indef blocked. -JodyB talk 20:08, 19 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]