Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Canpop

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
If you are creating a new request about this user, please add it to the top of the page, above this notice. Don't forget to add
{{Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Canpop}}
to the checkuser page here. Previous requests (shown below), and this box, will be automatically hidden on Requests for checkuser (but will still appear here).
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.

Canpop

  • Supporting evidence:

I think Canpop has helpfully listed socks on their user page. I came across this user when reverting blanking to

User:Xenocidic in order to edit Nigel321's user page. I noticed the list of "friends" and a couple that I checked out had also received vandalism warnings and had their user pages created by Canpop. Pretty sure these are all the same user but a checkuser to confirm as well as find any other accounts might be useful. If this case is too obvious/much trouble, I'll move over to WP:SSP. Thanks, R. Baley (talk) 16:52, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

I blocked Nigel for 72 hours (
talk) 17:07, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply
]
  • information Note: They all edit primarily from the same school. I can not absolutely confirm or rule out sockpuppetry for any of the accounts, but some of the accounts have edits from home IPs that make it unlikely they are actual sockpuppets. Certainly they know what they are doing, and seem to be coordinating some obnoxious behavior [1] [2]. An admin should look carefully at the contribs of the various accounts before taking any action. Thatcher 23:52, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Sounds similar to a response I just gave at my talk page. I had already indefblocked McSaucePaste (talk · contribs) (and caught some heat for it if I recall correctly) and came close just now to blocking two others - and yes, I just checked all of their contributions one-by-one. I agree though - a bunch of schoolmates, some of whom may be good-faith editors. Good to keep an eye on. —Wknight94 (talk) 17:24, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.
Subsequent requests related to this user should be made
above, in a new section.